Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa *** 40.0 (39.1, 40.8) N/A 1,636 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.2, -2.8)
United States *** 36.7 (36.6, 36.8) N/A 146,023 falling falling trend -4.9 (-5.2, -4.5)
Van Buren County *** 68.7 (48.2, 96.3) 1 (1, 68) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (0.0, 3.9)
Clarke County *** 59.5 (42.3, 82.2) 2 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.3)
Palo Alto County *** 57.1 (41.3, 78.3) 3 (1, 81) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.1)
Ringgold County *** 56.0 (35.5, 87.1) 4 (1, 95) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.2)
Monona County *** 55.0 (39.9, 75.6) 5 (1, 83) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Appanoose County *** 54.8 (41.1, 72.4) 6 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.7)
Adams County *** 53.3 (30.8, 90.5) 7 (1, 98) 3
*
*
Wapello County *** 52.7 (43.8, 63.1) 8 (1, 60) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Ida County *** 52.1 (34.7, 76.9) 9 (1, 95) 6
*
*
Hardin County *** 50.8 (39.8, 64.7) 10 (1, 79) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Mahaska County *** 50.8 (39.9, 64.0) 11 (1, 78) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Des Moines County *** 50.7 (42.8, 59.8) 12 (2, 60) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Greene County *** 50.3 (35.0, 71.2) 13 (1, 89) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.8)
Boone County *** 50.2 (40.0, 62.3) 14 (1, 72) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Adair County *** 49.8 (31.7, 75.8) 15 (1, 96) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Harrison County *** 49.6 (36.9, 65.9) 16 (1, 88) 11 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Pottawattamie County *** 49.2 (43.7, 55.2) 17 (4, 49) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Emmet County *** 48.8 (32.8, 70.8) 18 (1, 95) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Allamakee County *** 48.6 (35.9, 65.0) 19 (1, 89) 11
*
*
Wayne County *** 48.4 (29.3, 76.4) 20 (1, 97) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Sac County *** 48.0 (33.9, 67.2) 21 (1, 90) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.6)
Cherokee County *** 47.7 (34.3, 65.6) 22 (1, 91) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.5)
Woodbury County *** 47.3 (41.9, 53.3) 23 (5, 58) 56 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Humboldt County *** 46.7 (32.8, 65.9) 24 (1, 95) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Montgomery County *** 46.3 (32.7, 64.8) 25 (1, 94) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Louisa County *** 46.2 (32.3, 64.6) 26 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Keokuk County *** 45.7 (31.8, 64.6) 27 (1, 94) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Monroe County *** 45.4 (29.8, 67.6) 28 (1, 97) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Fremont County *** 45.3 (30.1, 67.5) 29 (1, 97) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Black Hawk County *** 45.2 (40.7, 50.2) 30 (10, 61) 75 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.0)
Benton County *** 44.3 (35.1, 55.5) 31 (4, 88) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Tama County *** 44.3 (33.4, 58.2) 32 (2, 91) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Howard County *** 44.0 (30.0, 63.5) 33 (1, 96) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.2)
Cedar County *** 44.0 (33.3, 57.5) 34 (2, 91) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Union County *** 44.0 (30.7, 61.6) 35 (1, 96) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Page County *** 43.7 (33.0, 57.5) 36 (2, 90) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Mills County *** 43.6 (31.5, 59.4) 37 (1, 93) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.6, 0.0)
Marshall County *** 43.2 (35.7, 51.9) 38 (6, 82) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Scott County *** 43.0 (39.1, 47.2) 39 (17, 67) 92 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.5)
Lee County *** 42.8 (35.2, 51.8) 40 (7, 83) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Cass County *** 42.8 (31.2, 58.2) 41 (2, 93) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Dickinson County *** 42.2 (32.6, 54.7) 42 (4, 90) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Webster County *** 42.2 (34.4, 51.4) 43 (7, 84) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Carroll County *** 42.1 (32.0, 54.7) 44 (4, 90) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Fayette County *** 41.7 (32.1, 53.8) 45 (5, 92) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Butler County *** 41.6 (30.2, 56.6) 46 (2, 94) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Taylor County *** 41.5 (23.0, 69.7) 47 (1, 98) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Clinton County *** 41.4 (35.0, 48.8) 48 (11, 82) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Lyon County *** 41.4 (27.9, 59.5) 49 (2, 97) 6
*
*
Poweshiek County *** 41.3 (31.0, 54.6) 50 (3, 93) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Polk County *** 40.9 (38.4, 43.6) 51 (28, 66) 199 falling falling trend -7.1 (-10.4, -3.7)
O'Brien County *** 40.9 (29.2, 56.2) 52 (3, 96) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Decatur County *** 40.6 (25.0, 63.4) 53 (1, 98) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.8)
Guthrie County *** 40.4 (28.0, 57.4) 54 (2, 96) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Henry County *** 40.3 (30.3, 52.8) 55 (5, 95) 11 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Linn County *** 39.9 (36.5, 43.5) 56 (28, 74) 107 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Calhoun County *** 39.7 (26.7, 58.0) 57 (2, 97) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Hamilton County *** 39.4 (28.8, 53.2) 58 (6, 96) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Buchanan County *** 39.3 (29.5, 51.6) 59 (6, 94) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Muscatine County *** 38.4 (31.3, 46.9) 60 (12, 90) 21 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Chickasaw County *** 38.3 (26.1, 55.1) 61 (3, 98) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Jackson County *** 38.3 (28.8, 50.4) 62 (7, 95) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Floyd County *** 38.2 (28.0, 51.6) 63 (5, 96) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Shelby County *** 37.8 (26.4, 53.5) 64 (6, 97) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.7)
Washington County *** 37.2 (28.1, 48.7) 65 (9, 95) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Warren County *** 37.2 (30.5, 45.0) 66 (20, 92) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Cerro Gordo County *** 36.9 (30.7, 44.1) 67 (22, 91) 26 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.7)
Jasper County *** 36.8 (30.0, 45.0) 68 (18, 93) 20 falling falling trend -6.2 (-9.7, -2.6)
Pocahontas County *** 36.5 (22.9, 57.7) 69 (3, 98) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Bremer County *** 35.9 (27.4, 46.4) 70 (13, 96) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Marion County *** 35.6 (28.1, 44.7) 71 (16, 95) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Worth County *** 35.5 (21.6, 56.7) 72 (3, 98) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.6)
Plymouth County *** 35.2 (26.9, 45.6) 73 (15, 96) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Buena Vista County *** 34.9 (24.8, 47.7) 74 (10, 98) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Dubuque County *** 34.5 (30.0, 39.5) 75 (39, 90) 45 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Dallas County *** 34.5 (28.9, 40.8) 76 (32, 93) 28 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Osceola County *** 34.2 (20.1, 57.0) 77 (3, 98) 4
*
*
Lucas County *** 34.0 (21.9, 52.0) 78 (7, 98) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.5)
Jones County *** 33.8 (25.1, 45.0) 79 (18, 97) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Hancock County *** 33.7 (22.8, 49.2) 80 (7, 98) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Clayton County *** 32.1 (23.4, 43.7) 81 (21, 98) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Mitchell County *** 31.7 (20.9, 47.4) 82 (11, 98) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.3)
Crawford County *** 31.4 (21.9, 44.0) 83 (14, 98) 7 stable stable trend -15.1 (-28.2, 0.3)
Clay County *** 31.4 (22.2, 43.6) 84 (18, 98) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Madison County *** 30.3 (20.8, 43.3) 85 (19, 98) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Iowa County *** 29.8 (20.5, 42.3) 86 (23, 98) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.4)
Story County *** 29.4 (24.4, 35.0) 87 (57, 97) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Winnebago County *** 28.9 (18.7, 44.0) 88 (14, 98) 5 falling falling trend -9.6 (-17.6, -0.9)
Wright County *** 28.6 (19.5, 41.6) 89 (28, 98) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Grundy County *** 28.3 (18.9, 41.8) 90 (24, 98) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Jefferson County *** 28.3 (19.3, 40.6) 91 (28, 98) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Delaware County *** 28.2 (19.9, 39.5) 92 (32, 98) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Johnson County *** 27.8 (23.8, 32.2) 93 (69, 97) 37 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.4, -2.3)
Davis County *** 26.7 (15.5, 44.0) 94 (21, 98) 3
*
*
Franklin County *** 25.2 (15.2, 40.3) 95 (31, 98) 4 stable stable trend -46.8 (-80.5, 45.6)
Kossuth County *** 24.7 (16.8, 36.1) 96 (49, 98) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Winneshiek County *** 23.1 (16.1, 32.7) 97 (62, 98) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Sioux County *** 18.8 (13.3, 26.0) 98 (83, 98) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Audubon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/28/2021 4:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top