Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa No 37.9 (37.1, 38.8) N/A 1,578 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.3, -3.3)
United States No 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) N/A 142,497 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Franklin County Yes 22.5 (13.2, 37.2) 94 (26, 96) 4 stable stable trend -39.4 (-67.2, 12.2)
Winnebago County Yes 23.2 (14.2, 37.1) 93 (32, 96) 4 falling falling trend -10.4 (-17.6, -2.4)
Dubuque County No 32.0 (27.8, 36.8) 76 (39, 90) 42 falling falling trend -8.8 (-14.6, -2.6)
Polk County No 39.0 (36.5, 41.6) 46 (24, 63) 196 falling falling trend -6.2 (-8.9, -3.6)
Johnson County Yes 24.7 (21.1, 28.9) 92 (72, 96) 34 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.3, -2.7)
Scott County No 41.8 (38.0, 45.9) 24 (11, 59) 92 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.8)
Linn County No 37.9 (34.7, 41.3) 55 (25, 72) 105 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.8)
Cerro Gordo County No 35.1 (29.1, 42.2) 66 (19, 89) 25 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.7)
Dallas County No 32.0 (26.8, 38.0) 75 (31, 93) 27 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Winneshiek County Yes 20.9 (14.4, 30.0) 95 (63, 96) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Marshall County No 35.7 (28.9, 43.8) 63 (14, 90) 20 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Jasper County No 36.3 (29.5, 44.3) 60 (12, 89) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Delaware County No 30.3 (21.5, 42.1) 85 (16, 96) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Lee County No 40.1 (32.8, 48.8) 37 (7, 84) 22 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Madison County No 30.8 (21.2, 43.7) 83 (12, 96) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Mitchell County No 28.5 (18.2, 43.6) 88 (11, 96) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Black Hawk County No 41.7 (37.3, 46.4) 27 (12, 63) 70 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Hamilton County No 36.6 (26.5, 50.0) 59 (4, 95) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Jones County No 32.8 (24.3, 43.8) 73 (13, 95) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Mills County No 41.6 (29.9, 56.8) 28 (2, 93) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Clinton County No 43.6 (37.1, 51.2) 21 (5, 68) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Webster County No 40.7 (33.1, 49.7) 34 (5, 84) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Worth County No 38.2 (23.8, 59.6) 53 (1, 96) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Clay County No 30.8 (21.9, 42.9) 82 (15, 96) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Clayton County No 31.6 (23.0, 43.1) 78 (17, 96) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Crawford County No 31.6 (22.0, 44.3) 79 (9, 96) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Dickinson County No 32.6 (24.1, 43.8) 74 (14, 95) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Harrison County No 47.4 (34.9, 63.5) 12 (1, 86) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Lucas County No 35.6 (22.6, 54.6) 64 (2, 96) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
Bremer County No 30.3 (22.6, 40.1) 84 (24, 96) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Hancock County No 33.6 (22.5, 49.5) 70 (4, 96) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Jackson County No 39.5 (30.0, 51.5) 42 (4, 90) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Jefferson County No 27.8 (19.0, 39.8) 89 (22, 96) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Montgomery County No 41.8 (29.0, 59.5) 25 (1, 94) 7 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Muscatine County No 37.8 (30.7, 46.2) 56 (10, 87) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Pocahontas County No 34.7 (21.5, 55.7) 67 (3, 96) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Wright County No 31.1 (21.4, 44.9) 80 (11, 96) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Story County No 27.0 (22.3, 32.5) 91 (57, 96) 24 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Calhoun County No 40.2 (27.0, 58.7) 36 (1, 95) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Cass County No 39.7 (28.7, 54.6) 39 (3, 93) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Fayette County No 38.5 (29.3, 50.2) 51 (5, 91) 12 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Warren County No 33.4 (27.2, 40.7) 71 (22, 92) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Fremont County No 39.3 (25.2, 60.6) 44 (2, 96) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Henry County No 41.0 (31.1, 53.5) 31 (3, 90) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Marion County No 31.7 (24.7, 40.2) 77 (24, 95) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Pottawattamie County No 49.1 (43.6, 55.1) 10 (2, 39) 60 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Buchanan County No 39.2 (29.6, 51.3) 45 (4, 90) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Carroll County No 39.4 (29.7, 51.7) 43 (3, 90) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Wayne County No 43.9 (25.9, 70.7) 19 (1, 96) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Woodbury County No 49.7 (44.1, 55.8) 7 (3, 38) 60 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Benton County No 41.6 (32.7, 52.4) 29 (4, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Chickasaw County No 39.0 (26.6, 55.9) 47 (2, 95) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Floyd County No 41.7 (30.7, 56.0) 26 (2, 91) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Humboldt County No 46.7 (32.5, 66.1) 15 (1, 92) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Sioux County Yes 20.4 (14.7, 27.8) 96 (74, 96) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Keokuk County No 41.1 (28.2, 59.2) 30 (2, 94) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Wapello County No 50.0 (41.3, 60.0) 6 (1, 57) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Buena Vista County No 31.1 (21.9, 43.2) 81 (12, 96) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Grundy County No 28.5 (19.0, 42.1) 87 (16, 96) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
Iowa County No 34.3 (24.3, 47.5) 69 (7, 96) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Boone County No 46.5 (36.7, 58.2) 16 (1, 77) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Butler County No 36.6 (26.4, 50.3) 58 (5, 95) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Des Moines County No 48.6 (41.0, 57.4) 11 (2, 56) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Hardin County No 38.6 (28.8, 51.2) 50 (5, 92) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Kossuth County No 28.8 (20.2, 40.9) 86 (18, 96) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Tama County No 38.3 (28.1, 51.5) 52 (4, 94) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Cedar County No 38.7 (28.9, 51.3) 48 (4, 93) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Decatur County No 35.6 (21.4, 56.9) 65 (2, 96) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Guthrie County No 39.7 (27.3, 57.1) 40 (2, 95) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Page County No 42.2 (31.7, 55.9) 23 (2, 89) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Union County No 49.6 (35.5, 68.1) 8 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Monroe County No 39.8 (25.1, 61.3) 38 (1, 96) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Shelby County No 32.9 (22.4, 48.0) 72 (7, 96) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Monona County No 49.3 (35.3, 68.9) 9 (1, 85) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Poweshiek County No 39.7 (29.7, 52.6) 41 (3, 92) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Emmet County No 45.6 (30.2, 67.0) 17 (1, 95) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Mahaska County No 46.7 (36.5, 59.3) 14 (1, 77) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Washington County No 37.3 (28.2, 48.7) 57 (6, 93) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Adair County No 45.2 (29.1, 68.8) 18 (1, 95) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Louisa County No 38.6 (26.1, 56.0) 49 (2, 95) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
O'Brien County No 38.0 (27.0, 52.6) 54 (3, 94) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Plymouth County No 35.8 (27.3, 46.3) 61 (7, 94) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Cherokee County No 43.7 (30.9, 61.2) 20 (1, 93) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Sac County No 40.8 (27.8, 58.9) 33 (2, 95) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.4)
Appanoose County No 42.5 (31.3, 57.6) 22 (2, 91) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.3)
Palo Alto County No 63.2 (46.3, 85.7) 2 (1, 62) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
Greene County No 53.9 (38.2, 75.2) 4 (1, 86) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Ringgold County No 46.8 (28.1, 76.2) 13 (1, 96) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.9)
Clarke County No 52.8 (37.0, 74.0) 5 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 3.0)
Howard County No 40.2 (27.1, 58.7) 35 (2, 95) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0)
Van Buren County No 71.2 (50.4, 99.2) 1 (1, 52) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 3.7)
Allamakee County No 35.8 (24.4, 51.3) 62 (4, 96) 7
*
*
Davis County No 27.5 (16.1, 44.9) 90 (7, 96) 4
*
*
Ida County No 54.9 (37.1, 80.1) 3 (1, 88) 6
*
*
Lyon County No 34.7 (22.8, 51.2) 68 (4, 96) 6
*
*
Osceola County No 41.0 (25.2, 65.4) 32 (1, 96) 4
*
*
Adams County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2022 7:30 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top