Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa No 167.8 (165.9, 169.7) 6,489 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
United States No 163.5 (163.3, 163.7) 586,354 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
Monroe County No 227.0 (189.3, 271.0) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.8)
Decatur County No 216.2 (178.7, 260.0) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Clarke County No 196.1 (162.6, 235.0) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.7)
Wapello County No 195.5 (177.8, 214.7) 92 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Adams County No 194.1 (146.9, 254.3) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Jackson County No 193.6 (170.5, 219.3) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Marshall County No 192.7 (176.3, 210.3) 107 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Ringgold County No 187.9 (148.5, 236.9) 18 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Buchanan County No 186.5 (163.8, 211.7) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Clinton County No 184.7 (170.1, 200.4) 124 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Muscatine County No 184.5 (167.8, 202.5) 93 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Fremont County No 183.5 (149.1, 225.0) 21 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.8, 9.9)
Cass County No 183.3 (157.9, 212.2) 40 falling falling trend -11.9 (-19.8, -3.1)
Mahaska County No 183.1 (161.5, 206.9) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.6)
Scott County No 182.8 (174.2, 191.7) 354 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Carroll County No 182.2 (161.1, 205.7) 59 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Taylor County No 182.0 (145.0, 227.0) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Marion County No 181.1 (163.2, 200.5) 77 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Webster County No 180.8 (164.3, 198.7) 91 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Pottawattamie County No 180.8 (169.8, 192.4) 207 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Guthrie County No 180.7 (152.6, 213.4) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Van Buren County No 179.8 (146.5, 219.7) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Emmet County No 179.8 (150.0, 214.5) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Page County No 179.6 (155.5, 206.7) 43 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Henry County No 179.5 (157.2, 204.3) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Calhoun County No 179.2 (150.8, 212.4) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Lucas County No 179.0 (148.9, 214.5) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Monona County No 178.9 (150.3, 212.7) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Lee County No 178.9 (162.5, 196.6) 92 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Polk County No 178.8 (173.1, 184.6) 774 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Davis County No 178.8 (145.5, 218.0) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Woodbury County No 178.4 (167.3, 190.0) 200 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Palo Alto County No 178.4 (148.9, 213.0) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Adair County No 177.4 (143.4, 218.2) 22 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Des Moines County No 174.9 (159.6, 191.5) 101 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Tama County No 173.7 (151.4, 198.7) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Harrison County No 173.0 (148.2, 201.3) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Dickinson County No 172.7 (150.8, 197.4) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Buena Vista County No 172.4 (149.2, 198.4) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Keokuk County No 172.2 (144.4, 204.6) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Sac County No 172.1 (144.5, 204.3) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Clay County No 171.5 (148.8, 197.0) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Boone County No 169.5 (150.6, 190.4) 61 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Mills County No 168.7 (142.2, 199.0) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Hardin County No 167.8 (146.7, 191.6) 50 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Winnebago County No 167.8 (140.1, 200.1) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Jasper County No 167.8 (151.8, 185.1) 85 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Pocahontas County No 166.6 (134.2, 205.8) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Floyd County No 166.4 (143.9, 191.8) 42 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Howard County No 166.1 (136.6, 200.9) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Union County No 165.7 (139.9, 195.4) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Linn County No 164.5 (157.2, 172.0) 400 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Washington County No 164.2 (144.4, 186.2) 53 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Greene County No 163.9 (135.9, 197.0) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Black Hawk County No 163.4 (154.3, 173.0) 253 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Plymouth County No 163.3 (144.5, 184.2) 57 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Delaware County No 162.9 (141.1, 187.6) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Louisa County No 162.9 (134.8, 195.6) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
O'Brien County No 162.8 (139.2, 189.7) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Appanoose County No 162.4 (138.0, 190.4) 33 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Poweshiek County No 162.1 (141.2, 185.6) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Butler County Yes 160.6 (138.0, 186.4) 39 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Warren County Yes 160.1 (145.3, 176.0) 88 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Dubuque County Yes 160.0 (150.0, 170.5) 198 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Lyon County Yes 159.7 (132.0, 191.8) 25 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Clayton County Yes 158.7 (137.6, 182.5) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Iowa County Yes 158.5 (136.1, 184.0) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Audubon County Yes 158.5 (123.9, 201.7) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Humboldt County Yes 158.1 (130.8, 190.4) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Cedar County Yes 156.5 (135.3, 180.4) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Story County Yes 155.4 (143.1, 168.4) 124 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Montgomery County Yes 154.4 (128.4, 185.0) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Osceola County Yes 154.2 (120.3, 196.1) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Benton County Yes 154.1 (135.7, 174.5) 53 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Allamakee County Yes 154.1 (131.2, 180.3) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Jones County Yes 153.7 (134.2, 175.5) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Franklin County Yes 153.3 (126.7, 184.7) 25 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Ida County Yes 153.1 (121.7, 191.5) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Crawford County Yes 151.9 (129.4, 177.5) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Hamilton County Yes 151.8 (129.4, 177.4) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Fayette County Yes 151.0 (132.4, 171.8) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Madison County Yes 150.7 (126.9, 177.9) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Wayne County Yes 150.5 (117.8, 190.9) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Chickasaw County Yes 149.3 (125.0, 177.6) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Cherokee County Yes 148.4 (124.5, 176.4) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Cerro Gordo County Yes 148.4 (135.3, 162.6) 100 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Johnson County Yes 147.4 (137.2, 158.1) 165 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Shelby County Yes 146.6 (123.9, 173.3) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Jefferson County Yes 146.5 (124.3, 172.0) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Hancock County Yes 145.7 (120.8, 175.0) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Kossuth County Yes 145.5 (124.3, 169.8) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Wright County Yes 144.4 (120.2, 172.6) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Winneshiek County Yes 142.9 (123.6, 164.8) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Mitchell County Yes 141.7 (117.7, 170.2) 27 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Sioux County Yes 141.4 (125.2, 159.2) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Dallas County Yes 136.4 (124.1, 149.6) 93 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -2.0)
Grundy County Yes 134.7 (112.1, 161.2) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Worth County Yes 134.3 (105.3, 170.1) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Bremer County Yes 132.6 (115.9, 151.3) 47 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/22/2019 6:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top