Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Kansas Yes 49.8 (48.7, 51.0) N/A 1,544 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
United States Yes 47.3 (47.2, 47.4) N/A 168,038 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Kingman County No 161.6 (119.9, 213.8) 1 (1, 3) 12 rising rising trend 19.6 (6.6, 34.2)
Cherokee County Yes 74.8 (59.2, 93.5) 5 (2, 38) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Marshall County Yes 50.4 (32.8, 75.4) 44 (4, 66) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Cowley County Yes 69.8 (57.6, 83.8) 7 (2, 40) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Nemaha County Yes 64.1 (43.4, 91.7) 13 (2, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Clay County Yes 62.3 (41.0, 92.3) 18 (2, 66) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Labette County Yes 61.2 (46.7, 79.1) 20 (3, 59) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Linn County Yes 56.5 (38.3, 81.8) 26 (2, 66) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Cloud County Yes 41.0 (23.7, 66.9) 60 (5, 66) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.4)
Grant County Yes 65.0 (40.7, 98.8) 10 (2, 66) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Geary County Yes 70.4 (54.1, 89.7) 6 (2, 50) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
McPherson County Yes 46.8 (36.3, 59.7) 51 (14, 65) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Lyon County Yes 50.4 (39.6, 63.3) 45 (11, 63) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Doniphan County Yes 59.8 (38.9, 89.4) 21 (2, 66) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Franklin County Yes 66.6 (53.7, 82.0) 9 (3, 47) 20 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Reno County Yes 56.1 (48.1, 65.2) 30 (9, 53) 39 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Seward County Yes 54.4 (40.3, 71.6) 34 (5, 64) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Shawnee County Yes 56.4 (51.6, 61.6) 27 (14, 45) 112 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Wilson County Yes 64.8 (43.2, 94.7) 11 (2, 64) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Crawford County Yes 63.9 (52.7, 76.9) 15 (4, 47) 25 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Harvey County Yes 53.5 (42.8, 66.2) 37 (8, 61) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Barton County Yes 43.5 (32.9, 56.7) 55 (17, 66) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Neosho County Yes 61.4 (45.3, 81.9) 19 (3, 60) 11 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Saline County Yes 50.5 (42.4, 59.7) 43 (14, 61) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Sedgwick County Yes 56.2 (53.3, 59.2) 29 (17, 41) 305 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Brown County Yes 47.3 (30.8, 70.9) 49 (5, 66) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Butler County Yes 48.8 (41.7, 56.9) 46 (19, 60) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Ellis County Yes 53.4 (41.2, 68.2) 38 (7, 63) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Greenwood County Yes 78.5 (49.1, 120.9) 4 (2, 62) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Marion County Yes 56.3 (38.9, 79.8) 28 (3, 65) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Montgomery County Yes 58.2 (47.0, 71.4) 23 (5, 56) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Osage County Yes 57.3 (42.3, 76.7) 24 (4, 63) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Rice County Yes 45.6 (27.6, 71.5) 53 (4, 66) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Allen County Yes 51.6 (35.4, 73.3) 41 (5, 66) 7 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Leavenworth County Yes 48.0 (41.7, 55.0) 48 (23, 60) 44 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Dickinson County Yes 41.8 (30.6, 56.5) 59 (19, 66) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Russell County Yes 68.8 (40.9, 109.0) 8 (2, 66) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Wyandotte County Yes 63.4 (58.0, 69.2) 16 (7, 33) 106 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Anderson County Yes 52.1 (30.8, 83.1) 40 (3, 66) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.6)
Bourbon County Yes 54.8 (38.0, 76.6) 32 (3, 66) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Miami County Yes 46.7 (37.5, 57.6) 52 (18, 65) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Pottawatomie County Yes 44.9 (33.3, 59.3) 54 (14, 66) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Riley County Yes 38.4 (31.1, 47.0) 62 (35, 66) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Douglas County Yes 38.8 (33.5, 44.7) 61 (42, 66) 41 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Atchison County Yes 54.4 (38.7, 74.5) 33 (5, 65) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Johnson County Yes 35.0 (33.0, 37.2) 65 (55, 66) 224 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Sumner County Yes 53.8 (41.7, 68.8) 36 (7, 62) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Jackson County Yes 37.8 (25.4, 55.1) 64 (20, 66) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Jefferson County Yes 42.7 (30.6, 58.5) 57 (15, 66) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Finney County Yes 42.3 (32.8, 53.6) 58 (22, 66) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Ford County Yes 31.4 (23.3, 41.4) 66 (46, 66) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Coffey County Yes 56.7 (36.1, 86.1) 25 (3, 66) 5
*
*
Edwards County Yes 115.5 (62.3, 197.6) 2 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Ellsworth County Yes 48.6 (27.6, 81.4) 47 (3, 66) 4
*
*
Gray County Yes 64.0 (36.7, 103.8) 14 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Harper County Yes 63.2 (36.6, 103.4) 17 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Mitchell County Yes 52.2 (28.5, 88.9) 39 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Morris County Yes 64.4 (35.9, 107.7) 12 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Ottawa County Yes 50.6 (27.4, 86.9) 42 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Pawnee County Yes 47.1 (28.3, 76.7) 50 (4, 66) 4
*
*
Pratt County Yes 37.8 (22.4, 60.8) 63 (12, 66) 4
*
*
Republic County Yes 84.4 (47.4, 140.3) 3 (1, 65) 4
*
*
Rooks County Yes 54.3 (30.1, 93.2) 35 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Scott County Yes 55.3 (30.8, 94.0) 31 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Stevens County Yes 58.8 (33.7, 96.6) 22 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Wabaunsee County Yes 43.4 (24.9, 72.3) 56 (5, 66) 4
*
*
Barber County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chase County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chautauqua County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gove County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hodgeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jewell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kearny County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meade County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ness County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osborne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rawlins County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stafford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trego County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wichita County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/31/2023 2:25 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top