Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas No 523.3 (516.9, 529.7) N/A 5,291 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
United States No 501.7 (501.1, 502.3) N/A 569,776 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Kingman County No 1,039.4 (886.9, 1,210.7) 1 (1, 5) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-24.1, 31.9)
Greeley County No 799.2 (460.7, 1,279.1) 2 (1, 104) 4
*
*
Lane County No 799.0 (534.0, 1,150.8) 3 (1, 102) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.4)
Harper County No 732.7 (588.6, 902.0) 4 (1, 68) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Doniphan County No 716.8 (589.4, 863.7) 5 (2, 70) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Crawford County No 707.0 (642.4, 776.4) 6 (2, 31) 91 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Rush County No 687.8 (514.8, 901.8) 7 (1, 96) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Edwards County No 672.4 (482.8, 911.7) 8 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.3)
Trego County No 671.9 (500.0, 886.2) 9 (1, 99) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Grant County No 667.3 (519.4, 844.0) 10 (2, 94) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Anderson County No 661.8 (548.2, 792.6) 11 (2, 78) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Elk County No 661.1 (486.4, 880.9) 12 (1, 100) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Hamilton County No 650.1 (416.5, 965.8) 13 (1, 104) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Comanche County No 648.8 (435.3, 936.5) 14 (1, 104) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Franklin County No 648.1 (576.2, 726.4) 15 (3, 55) 61 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Brown County No 645.1 (539.5, 765.7) 16 (2, 79) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Ellsworth County No 642.4 (513.1, 794.6) 17 (2, 94) 18 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Wilson County No 634.7 (525.4, 760.3) 18 (2, 90) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Morton County No 633.5 (443.0, 879.3) 19 (1, 103) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Cherokee County No 630.5 (555.7, 712.5) 20 (4, 70) 52 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Greenwood County No 629.0 (509.3, 769.0) 21 (2, 94) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Decatur County No 628.6 (462.2, 836.7) 22 (2, 102) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
Geary County No 623.8 (537.8, 719.8) 23 (3, 77) 38 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Russell County No 610.7 (495.9, 744.3) 24 (2, 91) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Cowley County No 605.5 (547.7, 667.7) 25 (8, 67) 83 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Neosho County No 601.7 (520.4, 692.2) 26 (5, 83) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Kiowa County No 599.9 (405.6, 855.9) 27 (1, 104) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.1)
Wyandotte County No 599.2 (567.2, 632.5) 28 (14, 52) 277 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Bourbon County No 591.0 (504.7, 687.9) 29 (5, 90) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Nemaha County No 587.4 (488.4, 700.9) 30 (4, 96) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Rawlins County No 581.0 (415.2, 794.4) 31 (2, 104) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Sumner County No 576.6 (509.5, 650.2) 32 (9, 86) 55 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Linn County No 575.4 (479.4, 685.1) 33 (5, 96) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Republic County No 569.3 (442.4, 722.1) 34 (3, 102) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Lincoln County No 568.2 (402.1, 779.8) 35 (2, 104) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Wichita County No 567.3 (358.3, 853.1) 36 (2, 104) 5
*
*
Leavenworth County No 566.7 (525.5, 610.2) 37 (18, 74) 146 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Saline County No 563.9 (518.9, 611.8) 38 (16, 76) 119 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Atchison County No 562.3 (480.5, 653.9) 39 (8, 93) 34 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Osage County No 562.1 (483.9, 649.2) 40 (10, 95) 38 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Lyon County No 559.2 (496.7, 627.4) 41 (11, 86) 61 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Clark County No 556.9 (348.1, 843.0) 42 (1, 104) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Montgomery County No 556.7 (501.4, 616.5) 43 (15, 84) 76 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.4, -0.9)
Chase County No 556.4 (388.4, 774.8) 44 (2, 104) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Labette County No 556.0 (487.0, 632.1) 45 (12, 89) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Pratt County No 553.9 (455.8, 667.5) 46 (6, 100) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Dickinson County No 553.7 (483.1, 632.0) 47 (13, 90) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Pawnee County No 553.2 (437.3, 690.5) 48 (5, 102) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Marshall County No 551.7 (459.5, 657.5) 49 (7, 100) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Osborne County No 548.9 (406.6, 726.3) 50 (3, 104) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Shawnee County No 548.8 (524.1, 574.3) 51 (29, 71) 382 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Scott County No 548.6 (412.9, 715.4) 52 (3, 103) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Jewell County No 548.3 (398.3, 738.2) 53 (2, 104) 9 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Marion County No 546.0 (463.7, 638.9) 54 (9, 96) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Butler County No 545.2 (502.3, 590.7) 55 (22, 81) 124 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Woodson County No 542.3 (388.4, 737.9) 56 (2, 104) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Ottawa County No 539.3 (416.7, 686.9) 57 (4, 103) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Chautauqua County No 538.6 (393.4, 721.2) 58 (3, 104) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Allen County No 537.4 (453.4, 632.6) 59 (9, 99) 30 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Rice County No 536.5 (438.3, 650.5) 60 (8, 102) 21 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.3)
Barber County No 534.4 (400.3, 699.4) 61 (4, 104) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Sedgwick County No 532.2 (516.3, 548.5) 62 (41, 73) 879 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Graham County No 528.0 (368.2, 735.8) 63 (3, 104) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
McPherson County No 521.2 (465.8, 581.6) 64 (25, 94) 69 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Meade County No 518.9 (376.1, 699.0) 65 (4, 104) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Ford County No 518.8 (451.3, 593.4) 66 (19, 97) 45 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Jefferson County No 511.5 (441.4, 589.5) 67 (20, 98) 39 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Harvey County No 510.1 (458.5, 566.0) 68 (28, 96) 75 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Morris County No 509.9 (400.3, 641.0) 69 (7, 103) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Reno County No 507.2 (468.7, 548.1) 70 (37, 91) 134 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Rooks County No 506.9 (383.8, 657.3) 71 (6, 104) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Cloud County No 504.4 (408.6, 616.3) 72 (12, 103) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Finney County No 502.5 (437.1, 574.6) 73 (26, 99) 45 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Washington County No 500.1 (388.1, 635.1) 74 (8, 104) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Hodgeman County No 499.6 (317.3, 753.1) 75 (3, 104) 5
*
*
Barton County No 499.0 (440.5, 563.2) 76 (25, 99) 55 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Smith County No 498.2 (369.0, 659.7) 77 (6, 104) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Phillips County No 497.7 (383.3, 636.6) 78 (8, 104) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Wabaunsee County No 497.4 (388.0, 627.9) 79 (9, 104) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Thomas County No 491.3 (383.5, 620.8) 80 (11, 104) 15 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Stevens County No 490.6 (355.6, 659.6) 81 (5, 104) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.6)
Riley County No 486.4 (437.0, 539.7) 82 (39, 99) 75 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Coffey County No 485.6 (388.2, 600.1) 83 (15, 104) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Pottawatomie County No 469.4 (402.0, 544.9) 84 (33, 103) 36 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Logan County No 467.2 (312.0, 675.3) 85 (5, 104) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Clay County No 464.8 (372.0, 574.2) 86 (20, 104) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Stafford County No 464.6 (337.5, 624.6) 87 (10, 104) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Ness County No 464.0 (318.7, 654.7) 88 (6, 104) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Ellis County No 463.7 (403.8, 529.9) 89 (40, 102) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Sherman County No 457.0 (347.1, 591.6) 90 (15, 104) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Douglas County No 454.3 (420.8, 489.7) 91 (62, 100) 142 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Jackson County No 451.5 (373.8, 540.7) 92 (29, 104) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Mitchell County No 449.6 (344.6, 577.1) 93 (18, 104) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Miami County No 444.9 (394.0, 500.6) 94 (54, 102) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Seward County No 437.2 (359.7, 526.5) 95 (34, 104) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Johnson County No 436.8 (423.2, 450.6) 96 (80, 100) 821 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Stanton County No 434.5 (255.9, 694.8) 97 (4, 104) 4
*
*
Sheridan County No 418.5 (276.4, 611.9) 98 (13, 104) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Cheyenne County No 417.8 (264.2, 626.4) 99 (7, 104) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Kearny County No 417.7 (276.3, 606.6) 100 (10, 104) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Gray County No 408.4 (294.2, 552.6) 101 (26, 104) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Gove County No 408.2 (268.1, 598.9) 102 (11, 104) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Norton County No 402.8 (295.9, 536.1) 103 (25, 104) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Haskell County No 363.0 (230.0, 545.3) 104 (18, 104) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Wallace County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/30/2023 10:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top