Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas N/A No 513.7 (507.4, 520.0) N/A 5,286 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -1.0)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Kingman County Rural No 1,183.1 (1,019.4, 1,365.8) 1 (1, 2) 39 rising rising trend 13.7 (5.1, 34.1)
Elk County Rural No 818.7 (610.2, 1,076.9) 2 (1, 83) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.8)
Morton County Rural No 771.6 (559.7, 1,038.9) 3 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 2.0)
Harper County Rural No 742.0 (592.9, 917.4) 4 (2, 69) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Rush County Rural No 713.6 (533.3, 936.5) 5 (2, 91) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Hamilton County Rural No 681.5 (432.9, 1,016.6) 6 (1, 103) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.6)
Lane County Rural No 660.1 (419.6, 988.6) 7 (1, 103) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2)
Republic County Rural No 658.3 (522.4, 820.3) 8 (2, 89) 17 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.9, 16.0)
Meade County Rural No 654.9 (487.6, 861.7) 9 (2, 99) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Brown County Rural No 651.4 (544.6, 773.4) 10 (2, 75) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.6)
Neosho County Rural No 645.9 (560.5, 740.8) 11 (3, 68) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Russell County Rural No 644.7 (523.0, 786.4) 12 (2, 90) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Crawford County Rural No 641.1 (580.5, 706.4) 13 (4, 50) 84 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Anderson County Rural No 630.7 (517.7, 761.6) 14 (2, 86) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Linn County Urban No 629.5 (527.1, 746.0) 15 (3, 84) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.7)
Cowley County Rural No 629.3 (569.7, 693.5) 16 (5, 55) 84 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Doniphan County Urban No 628.5 (508.4, 768.7) 17 (2, 91) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Cherokee County Urban No 626.2 (550.6, 709.5) 18 (4, 69) 51 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Kiowa County Rural No 620.0 (426.7, 874.1) 19 (2, 103) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Phillips County Rural No 613.6 (478.2, 776.0) 20 (2, 98) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Woodson County Rural No 612.9 (450.4, 816.5) 21 (2, 101) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Wilson County Rural No 611.8 (505.3, 734.5) 22 (3, 88) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Franklin County Rural No 611.3 (543.0, 685.7) 23 (5, 71) 60 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Trego County Rural No 610.6 (447.6, 816.6) 24 (2, 102) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Sumner County Urban No 608.1 (538.8, 684.0) 25 (5, 70) 58 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Comanche County Rural No 606.7 (397.9, 892.7) 26 (2, 103) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Edwards County Rural No 605.1 (426.0, 834.3) 27 (2, 102) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)
Nemaha County Rural No 604.7 (504.1, 719.8) 28 (3, 88) 28 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 9.5)
Barber County Rural No 603.2 (454.5, 785.1) 29 (2, 101) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Ellsworth County Rural No 599.8 (476.0, 746.0) 30 (3, 97) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Hodgeman County Rural No 593.6 (380.9, 885.5) 31 (2, 103) 5
*
*
Chase County Rural No 588.7 (407.4, 824.2) 32 (2, 103) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Marshall County Rural No 583.0 (485.6, 694.4) 33 (5, 95) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Labette County Rural No 581.8 (512.0, 658.6) 34 (8, 82) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Morris County Rural No 578.9 (457.4, 723.7) 35 (3, 100) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Chautauqua County Rural No 577.2 (430.2, 760.2) 36 (2, 102) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Rice County Rural No 574.0 (471.9, 692.1) 37 (4, 96) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Montgomery County Rural No 568.7 (512.6, 629.4) 38 (12, 79) 77 falling falling trend -1.2 (-5.1, -0.7)
Geary County Urban No 567.6 (489.3, 655.0) 39 (8, 90) 38 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Greenwood County Rural No 567.0 (456.1, 697.7) 40 (4, 99) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Dickinson County Rural No 564.1 (492.5, 643.3) 41 (9, 86) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Clark County Rural No 563.2 (345.4, 864.1) 42 (2, 103) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.3)
Lyon County Rural No 562.4 (498.8, 631.8) 43 (10, 85) 59 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Wyandotte County Urban No 558.2 (528.0, 589.5) 44 (23, 69) 271 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.9, -2.1)
Jewell County Rural No 553.1 (400.5, 746.9) 45 (2, 103) 9 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Clay County Rural No 548.2 (448.6, 664.0) 46 (6, 99) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Pratt County Rural No 546.4 (445.4, 663.9) 47 (6, 98) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Logan County Rural No 540.5 (371.8, 763.9) 48 (2, 103) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.8)
Butler County Urban No 539.3 (496.9, 584.2) 49 (24, 82) 125 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 538.1 (465.5, 618.9) 50 (12, 94) 40 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Leavenworth County Urban No 537.6 (498.3, 579.2) 51 (24, 80) 144 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Atchison County Rural No 530.8 (451.5, 620.2) 52 (12, 98) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Allen County Rural No 529.5 (445.8, 624.6) 53 (11, 99) 29 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Harvey County Urban No 528.0 (475.1, 585.3) 54 (22, 90) 77 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Ness County Rural No 527.5 (365.0, 740.0) 55 (3, 103) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Wabaunsee County Urban No 526.8 (415.6, 658.8) 56 (6, 102) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Shawnee County Urban No 526.0 (501.9, 550.9) 57 (36, 76) 370 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.6, -1.0)
Gray County Rural No 525.5 (391.7, 690.7) 58 (4, 103) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Sedgwick County Urban No 522.6 (507.1, 538.5) 59 (42, 74) 889 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.5, 0.3)
Barton County Rural No 521.9 (461.1, 588.5) 60 (19, 95) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Rooks County Rural No 520.1 (393.3, 675.1) 61 (4, 103) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 4.2)
Cloud County Rural No 519.3 (422.5, 632.0) 62 (8, 101) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Saline County Rural No 515.2 (473.2, 560.0) 63 (31, 88) 114 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Smith County Rural No 514.6 (379.4, 684.1) 64 (3, 103) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Osborne County Rural No 510.2 (375.0, 680.5) 65 (4, 103) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Bourbon County Rural No 509.4 (428.8, 601.0) 66 (14, 99) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Mitchell County Rural No 508.6 (391.6, 649.9) 67 (7, 103) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Grant County Rural No 508.4 (384.5, 659.7) 68 (6, 103) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.5)
Gove County Rural No 507.2 (350.8, 713.7) 69 (3, 103) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Marion County Rural No 504.0 (425.9, 592.9) 70 (17, 101) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Osage County Urban No 499.9 (425.5, 583.7) 71 (17, 100) 33 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Reno County Rural No 497.1 (458.7, 537.9) 72 (39, 92) 129 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Riley County Urban No 495.8 (445.5, 550.2) 73 (32, 96) 74 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Stevens County Rural No 495.3 (357.6, 667.9) 74 (5, 103) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.6)
Seward County Rural No 494.9 (412.3, 588.9) 75 (16, 101) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Rawlins County Rural No 492.2 (341.6, 690.5) 76 (4, 103) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Kearny County Rural No 487.4 (336.0, 684.5) 77 (4, 103) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.5)
Ford County Rural No 484.7 (420.9, 555.2) 78 (26, 100) 44 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Thomas County Rural No 482.7 (378.2, 608.2) 79 (12, 103) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Coffey County Rural No 482.3 (388.0, 593.0) 80 (16, 102) 18 falling falling trend -3.2 (-13.2, -1.0)
Pawnee County Rural No 480.3 (371.7, 610.8) 81 (10, 103) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Stanton County Rural No 476.8 (279.9, 758.9) 82 (2, 103) 4
*
*
Douglas County Urban No 473.7 (439.7, 509.6) 83 (53, 96) 150 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Stafford County Rural No 471.8 (343.3, 634.1) 84 (8, 103) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Ellis County Rural No 468.1 (406.8, 536.0) 85 (32, 101) 44 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
McPherson County Rural No 465.9 (414.1, 522.4) 86 (42, 100) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Jackson County Urban No 463.6 (385.5, 553.0) 87 (28, 103) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Cheyenne County Rural No 461.2 (310.5, 662.6) 88 (5, 103) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Finney County Rural No 460.3 (400.3, 526.6) 89 (37, 101) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Pottawatomie County Urban No 454.1 (390.2, 525.6) 90 (37, 102) 37 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Miami County Urban No 453.9 (403.0, 509.5) 91 (49, 101) 59 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Washington County Rural No 452.5 (348.6, 579.0) 92 (17, 103) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Ottawa County Rural No 452.0 (341.0, 588.2) 93 (11, 103) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Wichita County Rural No 440.3 (263.5, 692.1) 94 (4, 103) 4
*
*
Johnson County Urban No 432.5 (419.3, 445.9) 95 (81, 99) 846 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
Decatur County Rural No 432.0 (293.6, 615.0) 96 (7, 103) 7 stable stable trend -29.9 (-52.6, 0.8)
Graham County Rural No 428.3 (292.4, 611.7) 97 (9, 103) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Sheridan County Rural No 428.3 (281.1, 630.6) 98 (7, 103) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Norton County Rural No 418.7 (307.2, 557.5) 99 (18, 103) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.8)
Lincoln County Rural No 411.3 (277.0, 590.4) 100 (11, 103) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Scott County Rural No 401.0 (291.2, 540.2) 101 (21, 103) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Sherman County Rural No 398.6 (296.8, 525.4) 102 (29, 103) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Haskell County Rural No 349.4 (214.0, 537.3) 103 (22, 103) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Greeley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top