Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas No 887.2 (874.8, 899.7) N/A 4,004 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
United States No 855.4 (854.2, 856.5) N/A 431,628 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Kingman County No 1,681.2 (1,399.2, 2,002.8) 1 (1, 9) 25 rising rising trend 14.8 (0.8, 30.8)
Lane County No 1,256.7 (780.7, 1,913.7) 2 (1, 101) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.3)
Hamilton County No 1,248.9 (766.2, 1,920.0) 3 (1, 101) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.1)
Anderson County No 1,231.6 (1,006.4, 1,492.0) 4 (1, 67) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Doniphan County No 1,211.8 (968.1, 1,498.0) 5 (1, 79) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Harper County No 1,209.8 (952.5, 1,514.8) 6 (1, 83) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.2)
Crawford County No 1,180.8 (1,057.8, 1,314.1) 7 (2, 39) 69 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Ellsworth County No 1,166.1 (910.6, 1,470.3) 8 (1, 86) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.0)
Trego County No 1,162.7 (834.9, 1,577.5) 9 (1, 97) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Decatur County No 1,139.6 (819.8, 1,541.5) 10 (1, 98) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.4)
Comanche County No 1,136.2 (731.7, 1,683.6) 11 (1, 101) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.9)
Brown County No 1,133.0 (927.0, 1,371.0) 12 (2, 81) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Grant County No 1,122.9 (835.7, 1,476.1) 13 (1, 98) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Elk County No 1,114.9 (799.2, 1,514.2) 14 (1, 99) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Rush County No 1,094.1 (780.7, 1,491.5) 15 (1, 100) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Russell County No 1,075.1 (859.6, 1,327.5) 16 (2, 90) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Morton County No 1,068.7 (703.5, 1,554.0) 17 (1, 101) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Edwards County No 1,063.0 (725.0, 1,504.7) 18 (1, 101) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.9)
Greenwood County No 1,058.8 (833.5, 1,326.0) 19 (2, 93) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Chase County No 1,042.5 (714.7, 1,469.5) 20 (1, 101) 7
*
*
Franklin County No 1,036.2 (900.3, 1,186.8) 21 (5, 77) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Wilson County No 1,035.8 (836.1, 1,268.5) 22 (2, 90) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.3)
Woodson County No 1,035.2 (726.0, 1,431.0) 23 (1, 100) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.4)
Bourbon County No 1,031.6 (867.7, 1,217.4) 24 (4, 85) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Cherokee County No 1,000.7 (861.4, 1,156.1) 25 (5, 83) 37 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Pratt County No 1,000.6 (808.4, 1,225.0) 26 (4, 92) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Neosho County No 997.8 (845.9, 1,169.0) 27 (5, 87) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Wichita County No 997.5 (603.1, 1,547.1) 28 (1, 102) 4
*
*
Kiowa County No 996.3 (638.1, 1,481.1) 29 (1, 102) 5 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.2, 6.7)
Leavenworth County No 983.8 (901.8, 1,071.2) 30 (12, 69) 109 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Atchison County No 983.5 (825.4, 1,163.0) 31 (6, 90) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Wyandotte County No 983.0 (920.4, 1,048.7) 32 (16, 65) 190 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Osborne County No 979.1 (706.8, 1,321.2) 33 (2, 100) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Geary County No 978.6 (820.8, 1,157.9) 34 (6, 89) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.4, 0.0)
Jewell County No 973.9 (693.3, 1,328.4) 35 (2, 101) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Rice County No 972.7 (779.4, 1,199.2) 36 (4, 96) 18 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Ottawa County No 972.6 (731.1, 1,268.1) 37 (2, 100) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Meade County No 970.9 (686.1, 1,335.0) 38 (2, 101) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Cowley County No 969.2 (862.7, 1,085.0) 39 (11, 80) 61 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Dickinson County No 964.7 (827.4, 1,118.2) 40 (8, 89) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Saline County No 963.9 (877.4, 1,056.7) 41 (13, 76) 93 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Sumner County No 963.7 (835.4, 1,106.2) 42 (10, 86) 41 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Butler County No 959.3 (873.9, 1,050.9) 43 (15, 77) 95 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Ford County No 958.8 (820.4, 1,113.6) 44 (8, 89) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Linn County No 954.2 (773.3, 1,164.3) 45 (4, 95) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Chautauqua County No 947.8 (681.7, 1,283.8) 46 (2, 101) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Washington County No 944.5 (724.7, 1,210.0) 47 (3, 99) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Nemaha County No 942.5 (760.9, 1,154.4) 48 (5, 96) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Jefferson County No 941.4 (799.3, 1,101.3) 49 (9, 92) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Smith County No 939.6 (678.3, 1,266.2) 50 (2, 100) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Graham County No 939.2 (636.5, 1,335.8) 51 (2, 102) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Pawnee County No 937.5 (715.9, 1,205.1) 52 (4, 100) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Republic County No 937.4 (708.0, 1,216.7) 53 (3, 100) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Labette County No 936.3 (803.7, 1,084.5) 54 (9, 90) 36 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Lyon County No 936.1 (816.9, 1,067.5) 55 (13, 89) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Marshall County No 934.4 (760.1, 1,136.9) 56 (6, 96) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Osage County No 928.5 (780.2, 1,096.7) 57 (9, 94) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Thomas County No 919.1 (702.3, 1,181.8) 58 (4, 100) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Shawnee County No 917.5 (870.3, 966.6) 59 (30, 73) 289 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Montgomery County No 915.5 (811.8, 1,028.8) 60 (16, 87) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Rawlins County No 909.5 (616.9, 1,293.3) 61 (2, 102) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Marion County No 905.4 (752.5, 1,080.2) 62 (9, 95) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Phillips County No 903.6 (680.6, 1,176.2) 63 (4, 100) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Allen County No 901.2 (744.3, 1,081.6) 64 (10, 96) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
McPherson County No 899.7 (793.5, 1,016.3) 65 (18, 91) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Cloud County No 898.4 (713.8, 1,115.7) 66 (7, 99) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Hodgeman County No 894.6 (540.0, 1,395.8) 67 (1, 102) 4
*
*
Finney County No 894.2 (762.1, 1,042.6) 68 (14, 95) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Barber County No 888.6 (645.3, 1,193.8) 69 (4, 101) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Morris County No 885.8 (677.5, 1,138.1) 70 (5, 100) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Sedgwick County No 870.9 (840.2, 902.5) 71 (47, 79) 625 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Barton County No 864.2 (751.4, 989.2) 72 (20, 95) 44 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Clark County No 860.3 (509.2, 1,358.1) 73 (1, 102) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Scott County No 859.7 (615.8, 1,168.3) 74 (4, 101) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Harvey County No 854.2 (757.2, 960.1) 75 (28, 95) 59 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Sherman County No 853.6 (631.8, 1,127.8) 76 (5, 102) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Wabaunsee County No 848.3 (639.1, 1,103.6) 77 (7, 101) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Riley County No 836.4 (740.0, 941.9) 78 (32, 94) 57 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Reno County No 814.2 (743.5, 889.7) 79 (47, 93) 101 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lincoln County No 813.2 (525.8, 1,196.6) 80 (3, 102) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Pottawatomie County No 809.4 (677.2, 959.8) 81 (23, 99) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Ness County No 806.5 (536.7, 1,164.4) 82 (4, 102) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Coffey County No 792.2 (611.6, 1,009.1) 83 (15, 102) 13 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.6, -1.6)
Douglas County No 788.5 (722.3, 859.1) 84 (55, 95) 108 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Gove County No 783.2 (500.1, 1,166.4) 85 (4, 102) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Johnson County No 779.0 (751.8, 806.9) 86 (70, 92) 641 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Rooks County No 769.5 (560.8, 1,031.1) 87 (11, 102) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Stevens County No 769.1 (518.2, 1,097.5) 88 (6, 102) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Logan County No 762.6 (470.8, 1,168.1) 89 (4, 102) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Ellis County No 749.7 (637.9, 875.4) 90 (41, 100) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Jackson County No 739.8 (594.7, 909.8) 91 (35, 101) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Stafford County No 723.8 (493.4, 1,024.5) 92 (9, 102) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Seward County No 719.7 (569.1, 898.2) 93 (31, 102) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Sheridan County No 718.1 (446.4, 1,095.6) 94 (6, 102) 5
*
*
Mitchell County No 710.8 (527.0, 937.5) 95 (19, 102) 10 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Miami County No 703.1 (607.0, 810.0) 96 (61, 101) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Gray County No 665.2 (449.7, 947.9) 97 (21, 102) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Clay County No 665.0 (509.9, 852.7) 98 (39, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Kearny County No 634.6 (379.2, 995.5) 99 (10, 102) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.5)
Norton County No 629.6 (440.1, 873.4) 100 (41, 102) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Haskell County No 618.8 (362.9, 987.4) 101 (10, 102) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Cheyenne County No 463.6 (263.0, 756.4) 102 (55, 102) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
Greeley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/26/2024 9:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top