Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas N/A No 134.4 (132.1, 136.8) N/A 2,632 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.7)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Butler County Urban No 136.9 (121.3, 154.0) 54 (24, 80) 59 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Cherokee County Urban No 147.2 (119.5, 180.2) 43 (8, 84) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Doniphan County Urban No 166.1 (119.4, 227.1) 22 (2, 86) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.8)
Douglas County Urban Yes 116.6 (104.7, 129.6) 78 (50, 88) 73 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Geary County Urban No 149.5 (120.4, 183.2) 38 (8, 85) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Harvey County Urban No 132.1 (111.9, 155.3) 60 (21, 86) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-8.3, -0.4)
Jackson County Urban Yes 105.1 (78.4, 139.4) 86 (33, 91) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 136.9 (109.8, 169.6) 53 (12, 88) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.2)
Johnson County Urban Yes 115.6 (110.8, 120.7) 79 (64, 85) 447 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Leavenworth County Urban No 133.2 (119.0, 148.6) 59 (26, 80) 67 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Linn County Urban No 142.7 (105.0, 191.5) 48 (6, 89) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Miami County Urban Yes 122.6 (103.1, 145.2) 72 (27, 89) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Osage County Urban No 147.9 (117.3, 184.9) 41 (7, 86) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Pottawatomie County Urban No 129.5 (104.6, 158.8) 65 (16, 89) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Riley County Urban No 130.0 (111.7, 150.5) 64 (24, 86) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Sedgwick County Urban No 136.8 (131.0, 142.8) 55 (36, 67) 446 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.8, -0.9)
Shawnee County Urban No 144.5 (135.2, 154.4) 46 (25, 63) 193 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Sumner County Urban No 153.8 (127.9, 184.0) 34 (8, 79) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Wabaunsee County Urban No 125.9 (85.4, 182.1) 69 (7, 91) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.9)
Wyandotte County Urban No 141.4 (130.7, 152.9) 49 (26, 70) 134 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.9, -1.7)
Allen County Rural No 157.2 (122.2, 200.3) 29 (4, 85) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Anderson County Rural No 193.2 (147.8, 251.2) 7 (2, 71) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Atchison County Rural No 131.6 (102.3, 167.4) 61 (13, 89) 15 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Barber County Rural Yes 105.2 (63.4, 172.4) 85 (10, 91) 4 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -0.2)
Barton County Rural No 129.4 (106.5, 156.2) 66 (19, 88) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Bourbon County Rural No 125.1 (95.2, 162.3) 70 (13, 91) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Brown County Rural No 188.1 (144.2, 242.8) 9 (2, 72) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 1.9)
Chase County Rural No 228.0 (139.1, 363.5) 3 (1, 87) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Chautauqua County Rural No 211.8 (132.9, 325.9) 5 (1, 88) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 2.9)
Cheyenne County Rural No 187.3 (104.1, 318.2) 10 (1, 91) 4
*
*
Clark County Rural No 187.1 (100.7, 329.3) 11 (1, 91) 3
*
*
Clay County Rural No 156.0 (115.3, 209.2) 31 (4, 88) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 11.9)
Cloud County Rural Yes 113.8 (80.0, 159.3) 81 (15, 91) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
Coffey County Rural Yes 98.9 (69.0, 140.7) 89 (28, 91) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Cowley County Rural No 170.7 (146.9, 197.4) 16 (5, 59) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Crawford County Rural No 155.4 (134.0, 179.6) 32 (10, 70) 40 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Decatur County Rural No 149.6 (76.7, 270.8) 37 (2, 91) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.4)
Dickinson County Rural No 161.0 (132.2, 195.2) 28 (5, 75) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Edwards County Rural No 246.6 (147.5, 389.9) 2 (1, 88) 5
*
*
Elk County Rural No 148.9 (85.7, 260.2) 39 (2, 91) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 0.4)
Ellis County Rural Yes 114.2 (92.3, 140.1) 80 (33, 91) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Ellsworth County Rural No 161.4 (108.4, 235.3) 27 (2, 90) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9)
Finney County Rural No 134.7 (111.2, 161.5) 57 (17, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Ford County Rural No 127.4 (104.2, 154.3) 68 (20, 88) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Franklin County Rural No 161.8 (135.3, 192.2) 26 (7, 73) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Gove County Rural Yes 119.9 (67.0, 212.7) 75 (4, 91) 3 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.1)
Graham County Rural Yes 105.1 (59.0, 197.4) 87 (8, 91) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.1, 0.0)
Grant County Rural No 171.6 (118.8, 240.5) 15 (2, 88) 7
*
*
Gray County Rural No 157.0 (102.5, 231.7) 30 (2, 91) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Greenwood County Rural No 192.1 (137.4, 265.4) 8 (2, 83) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Harper County Rural No 146.3 (97.7, 214.8) 44 (3, 91) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.2)
Jewell County Rural Yes 113.4 (67.7, 200.4) 82 (5, 91) 4
*
*
Kearny County Rural No 130.5 (74.1, 215.9) 62 (3, 91) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.4)
Kingman County Rural No 375.1 (303.7, 460.7) 1 (1, 3) 21 rising rising trend 15.6 (7.1, 37.4)
Labette County Rural No 151.5 (124.7, 183.2) 36 (9, 80) 25 falling falling trend -4.9 (-15.6, -0.4)
Logan County Rural No 163.0 (85.5, 286.0) 25 (2, 91) 3
*
*
Lyon County Rural No 153.6 (128.9, 181.8) 35 (8, 77) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Marion County Rural No 134.9 (105.1, 172.9) 56 (10, 89) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Marshall County Rural No 169.5 (131.7, 217.0) 18 (3, 78) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.2)
McPherson County Rural Yes 120.5 (100.8, 143.4) 74 (32, 89) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Meade County Rural No 201.6 (135.7, 293.5) 6 (2, 86) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9)
Mitchell County Rural Yes 118.0 (76.1, 178.4) 77 (8, 91) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.2)
Montgomery County Rural No 145.6 (124.6, 169.6) 45 (13, 79) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Morris County Rural No 178.1 (125.7, 250.1) 13 (2, 86) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Nemaha County Rural No 163.7 (123.6, 214.2) 23 (3, 86) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Neosho County Rural No 167.5 (134.3, 207.2) 20 (4, 76) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Norton County Rural Yes 107.2 (65.1, 172.6) 84 (10, 91) 5
*
*
Osborne County Rural Yes 121.5 (74.6, 199.3) 73 (5, 91) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Ottawa County Rural No 143.2 (96.4, 209.2) 47 (3, 91) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Pawnee County Rural Yes 119.1 (78.7, 178.9) 76 (9, 91) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1)
Phillips County Rural No 170.6 (110.8, 254.1) 17 (2, 90) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 6.1)
Pratt County Rural No 147.9 (111.1, 195.5) 40 (5, 89) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Rawlins County Rural Yes 112.9 (64.4, 205.2) 83 (5, 91) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3)
Reno County Rural No 124.9 (110.5, 141.0) 71 (34, 86) 61 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Republic County Rural No 187.0 (127.8, 269.5) 12 (2, 84) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.1)
Rice County Rural No 138.4 (99.5, 188.9) 51 (5, 91) 10 stable stable trend -3.0 (-24.9, 0.0)
Rooks County Rural No 137.4 (88.2, 208.6) 52 (3, 91) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Rush County Rural No 213.9 (138.6, 326.8) 4 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.7)
Russell County Rural No 175.8 (122.4, 246.3) 14 (2, 86) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Saline County Rural No 134.0 (117.8, 151.9) 58 (25, 82) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Scott County Rural Yes 98.3 (58.0, 160.2) 90 (14, 91) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Seward County Rural No 127.7 (98.4, 162.8) 67 (15, 90) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Sherman County Rural Yes 102.5 (63.8, 159.6) 88 (12, 91) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7)
Smith County Rural No 166.4 (105.2, 260.0) 21 (2, 91) 6
*
*
Stafford County Rural No 169.4 (103.2, 265.5) 19 (2, 91) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.6)
Stevens County Rural No 147.4 (93.0, 223.8) 42 (2, 91) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 4.4)
Thomas County Rural No 140.3 (99.6, 194.3) 50 (6, 91) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Trego County Rural No 163.6 (105.8, 259.1) 24 (2, 91) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2)
Washington County Rural Yes 96.5 (63.5, 147.7) 91 (25, 91) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Wilson County Rural No 154.7 (115.1, 206.0) 33 (4, 87) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Woodson County Rural No 130.0 (79.1, 216.4) 63 (3, 91) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.1)
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hodgeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ness County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wichita County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/14/2024 12:42 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top