Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kansas | N/A | No | 134.4 (132.1, 136.8) | N/A | 2,632 | falling | -0.9 (-1.7, -0.7) |
United States | N/A | No | 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) | N/A | 285,526 | falling | -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1) |
Kingman County | Rural | No | 375.1 (303.7, 460.7) | 1 (1, 3) | 21 | rising | 15.6 (7.1, 37.4) |
Edwards County | Rural | No | 246.6 (147.5, 389.9) | 2 (1, 88) | 5 |
|
|
Chase County | Rural | No | 228.0 (139.1, 363.5) | 3 (1, 87) | 5 | stable | 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7) |
Rush County | Rural | No | 213.9 (138.6, 326.8) | 4 (1, 87) | 6 | stable | 1.1 (-1.3, 3.7) |
Chautauqua County | Rural | No | 211.8 (132.9, 325.9) | 5 (1, 88) | 6 | stable | 0.6 (-1.8, 2.9) |
Meade County | Rural | No | 201.6 (135.7, 293.5) | 6 (2, 86) | 6 | stable | 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9) |
Anderson County | Rural | No | 193.2 (147.8, 251.2) | 7 (2, 71) | 13 | stable | -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6) |
Greenwood County | Rural | No | 192.1 (137.4, 265.4) | 8 (2, 83) | 10 | stable | -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7) |
Brown County | Rural | No | 188.1 (144.2, 242.8) | 9 (2, 72) | 14 | stable | 0.9 (-0.2, 1.9) |
Cheyenne County | Rural | No | 187.3 (104.1, 318.2) | 10 (1, 91) | 4 |
|
|
Clark County | Rural | No | 187.1 (100.7, 329.3) | 11 (1, 91) | 3 |
|
|
Republic County | Rural | No | 187.0 (127.8, 269.5) | 12 (2, 84) | 9 | stable | 1.4 (-0.4, 3.1) |
Morris County | Rural | No | 178.1 (125.7, 250.1) | 13 (2, 86) | 9 | stable | 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1) |
Russell County | Rural | No | 175.8 (122.4, 246.3) | 14 (2, 86) | 9 | stable | 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6) |
Grant County | Rural | No | 171.6 (118.8, 240.5) | 15 (2, 88) | 7 |
|
|
Cowley County | Rural | No | 170.7 (146.9, 197.4) | 16 (5, 59) | 41 | stable | -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3) |
Phillips County | Rural | No | 170.6 (110.8, 254.1) | 17 (2, 90) | 7 | stable | 1.1 (-0.4, 6.1) |
Marshall County | Rural | No | 169.5 (131.7, 217.0) | 18 (3, 78) | 15 | stable | 0.1 (-1.2, 1.2) |
Stafford County | Rural | No | 169.4 (103.2, 265.5) | 19 (2, 91) | 5 | stable | -0.3 (-2.4, 1.6) |
Neosho County | Rural | No | 167.5 (134.3, 207.2) | 20 (4, 76) | 20 | stable | 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4) |
Smith County | Rural | No | 166.4 (105.2, 260.0) | 21 (2, 91) | 6 |
|
|
Doniphan County | Urban | No | 166.1 (119.4, 227.1) | 22 (2, 86) | 9 | stable | -0.1 (-1.8, 1.8) |
Nemaha County | Rural | No | 163.7 (123.6, 214.2) | 23 (3, 86) | 14 | stable | 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6) |
Trego County | Rural | No | 163.6 (105.8, 259.1) | 24 (2, 91) | 5 | stable | -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2) |
Logan County | Rural | No | 163.0 (85.5, 286.0) | 25 (2, 91) | 3 |
|
|
Franklin County | Rural | No | 161.8 (135.3, 192.2) | 26 (7, 73) | 29 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6) |
Ellsworth County | Rural | No | 161.4 (108.4, 235.3) | 27 (2, 90) | 8 | stable | 0.4 (-1.0, 1.9) |
Dickinson County | Rural | No | 161.0 (132.2, 195.2) | 28 (5, 75) | 25 | stable | 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9) |
Allen County | Rural | No | 157.2 (122.2, 200.3) | 29 (4, 85) | 16 | stable | -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1) |
Gray County | Rural | No | 157.0 (102.5, 231.7) | 30 (2, 91) | 6 | stable | -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7) |
Clay County | Rural | No | 156.0 (115.3, 209.2) | 31 (4, 88) | 11 | stable | 0.7 (-1.1, 11.9) |
Crawford County | Rural | No | 155.4 (134.0, 179.6) | 32 (10, 70) | 40 | stable | 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7) |
Wilson County | Rural | No | 154.7 (115.1, 206.0) | 33 (4, 87) | 11 | stable | 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4) |
Sumner County | Urban | No | 153.8 (127.9, 184.0) | 34 (8, 79) | 27 | stable | -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4) |
Lyon County | Rural | No | 153.6 (128.9, 181.8) | 35 (8, 77) | 30 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4) |
Labette County | Rural | No | 151.5 (124.7, 183.2) | 36 (9, 80) | 25 | falling | -4.9 (-15.6, -0.4) |
Decatur County | Rural | No | 149.6 (76.7, 270.8) | 37 (2, 91) | 4 | stable | 2.0 (-0.2, 4.4) |
Geary County | Urban | No | 149.5 (120.4, 183.2) | 38 (8, 85) | 19 | stable | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6) |
Elk County | Rural | No | 148.9 (85.7, 260.2) | 39 (2, 91) | 4 | stable | -1.7 (-4.4, 0.4) |
Pratt County | Rural | No | 147.9 (111.1, 195.5) | 40 (5, 89) | 12 | stable | -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7) |
Osage County | Urban | No | 147.9 (117.3, 184.9) | 41 (7, 86) | 17 | stable | -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7) |
Stevens County | Rural | No | 147.4 (93.0, 223.8) | 42 (2, 91) | 5 | stable | 1.5 (-0.9, 4.4) |
Cherokee County | Urban | No | 147.2 (119.5, 180.2) | 43 (8, 84) | 21 | stable | -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3) |
Harper County | Rural | No | 146.3 (97.7, 214.8) | 44 (3, 91) | 7 | stable | 0.2 (-1.9, 2.2) |
Montgomery County | Rural | No | 145.6 (124.6, 169.6) | 45 (13, 79) | 37 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
Shawnee County | Urban | No | 144.5 (135.2, 154.4) | 46 (25, 63) | 193 | falling | -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1) |
Ottawa County | Rural | No | 143.2 (96.4, 209.2) | 47 (3, 91) | 6 | stable | -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1) |
Linn County | Urban | No | 142.7 (105.0, 191.5) | 48 (6, 89) | 10 | stable | 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2) |
Wyandotte County | Urban | No | 141.4 (130.7, 152.9) | 49 (26, 70) | 134 | falling | -3.1 (-6.9, -1.7) |
Thomas County | Rural | No | 140.3 (99.6, 194.3) | 50 (6, 91) | 9 | stable | -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1) |
Rice County | Rural | No | 138.4 (99.5, 188.9) | 51 (5, 91) | 10 | stable | -3.0 (-24.9, 0.0) |
Rooks County | Rural | No | 137.4 (88.2, 208.6) | 52 (3, 91) | 6 | stable | -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1) |
Jefferson County | Urban | No | 136.9 (109.8, 169.6) | 53 (12, 88) | 19 | stable | -1.0 (-2.0, 0.2) |
Butler County | Urban | No | 136.9 (121.3, 154.0) | 54 (24, 80) | 59 | stable | -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2) |
Sedgwick County | Urban | No | 136.8 (131.0, 142.8) | 55 (36, 67) | 446 | falling | -1.3 (-3.8, -0.9) |
Marion County | Rural | No | 134.9 (105.1, 172.9) | 56 (10, 89) | 15 | stable | -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5) |
Finney County | Rural | No | 134.7 (111.2, 161.5) | 57 (17, 87) | 24 | stable | -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
Saline County | Rural | No | 134.0 (117.8, 151.9) | 58 (25, 82) | 55 | stable | -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2) |
Leavenworth County | Urban | No | 133.2 (119.0, 148.6) | 59 (26, 80) | 67 | falling | -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0) |
Harvey County | Urban | No | 132.1 (111.9, 155.3) | 60 (21, 86) | 35 | falling | -1.5 (-8.3, -0.4) |
Atchison County | Rural | No | 131.6 (102.3, 167.4) | 61 (13, 89) | 15 | falling | -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1) |
Kearny County | Rural | No | 130.5 (74.1, 215.9) | 62 (3, 91) | 3 | stable | -0.1 (-2.3, 2.4) |
Woodson County | Rural | No | 130.0 (79.1, 216.4) | 63 (3, 91) | 4 | stable | 0.0 (-2.2, 2.1) |
Riley County | Urban | No | 130.0 (111.7, 150.5) | 64 (24, 86) | 38 | stable | -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4) |
Pottawatomie County | Urban | No | 129.5 (104.6, 158.8) | 65 (16, 89) | 20 | stable | -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4) |
Barton County | Rural | No | 129.4 (106.5, 156.2) | 66 (19, 88) | 26 | stable | 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2) |
Seward County | Rural | No | 127.7 (98.4, 162.8) | 67 (15, 90) | 13 | stable | -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1) |
Ford County | Rural | No | 127.4 (104.2, 154.3) | 68 (20, 88) | 22 | stable | -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1) |
Wabaunsee County | Urban | No | 125.9 (85.4, 182.1) | 69 (7, 91) | 7 | stable | -0.7 (-2.1, 0.9) |
Bourbon County | Rural | No | 125.1 (95.2, 162.3) | 70 (13, 91) | 13 | stable | -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9) |
Reno County | Rural | No | 124.9 (110.5, 141.0) | 71 (34, 86) | 61 | falling | -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2) |
Miami County | Urban | Yes | 122.6 (103.1, 145.2) | 72 (27, 89) | 29 | falling | -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7) |
Osborne County | Rural | Yes | 121.5 (74.6, 199.3) | 73 (5, 91) | 5 | stable | 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2) |
McPherson County | Rural | Yes | 120.5 (100.8, 143.4) | 74 (32, 89) | 31 | stable | -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3) |
Gove County | Rural | Yes | 119.9 (67.0, 212.7) | 75 (4, 91) | 3 | stable | 0.0 (-2.9, 3.1) |
Pawnee County | Rural | Yes | 119.1 (78.7, 178.9) | 76 (9, 91) | 6 | stable | -0.4 (-2.0, 1.1) |
Mitchell County | Rural | Yes | 118.0 (76.1, 178.4) | 77 (8, 91) | 6 | stable | -0.6 (-2.6, 1.2) |
Douglas County | Urban | Yes | 116.6 (104.7, 129.6) | 78 (50, 88) | 73 | falling | -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6) |
Johnson County | Urban | Yes | 115.6 (110.8, 120.7) | 79 (64, 85) | 447 | falling | -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0) |
Ellis County | Rural | Yes | 114.2 (92.3, 140.1) | 80 (33, 91) | 20 | stable | -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2) |
Cloud County | Rural | Yes | 113.8 (80.0, 159.3) | 81 (15, 91) | 9 | stable | -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5) |
Jewell County | Rural | Yes | 113.4 (67.7, 200.4) | 82 (5, 91) | 4 |
|
|
Rawlins County | Rural | Yes | 112.9 (64.4, 205.2) | 83 (5, 91) | 4 | stable | 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3) |
Norton County | Rural | Yes | 107.2 (65.1, 172.6) | 84 (10, 91) | 5 |
|
|
Barber County | Rural | Yes | 105.2 (63.4, 172.4) | 85 (10, 91) | 4 | falling | -1.9 (-3.9, -0.2) |
Jackson County | Urban | Yes | 105.1 (78.4, 139.4) | 86 (33, 91) | 11 | falling | -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2) |
Graham County | Rural | Yes | 105.1 (59.0, 197.4) | 87 (8, 91) | 3 | stable | -2.0 (-4.1, 0.0) |
Sherman County | Rural | Yes | 102.5 (63.8, 159.6) | 88 (12, 91) | 5 | stable | -0.2 (-2.2, 1.7) |
Coffey County | Rural | Yes | 98.9 (69.0, 140.7) | 89 (28, 91) | 7 | stable | -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4) |
Scott County | Rural | Yes | 98.3 (58.0, 160.2) | 90 (14, 91) | 4 | stable | -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5) |
Washington County | Rural | Yes | 96.5 (63.5, 147.7) | 91 (25, 91) | 6 | stable | -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5) |
Comanche County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Greeley County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hamilton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Haskell County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Hodgeman County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Kiowa County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lane County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Lincoln County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Morton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Ness County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Sheridan County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Stanton County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Wallace County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Wichita County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/08/2024 7:31 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/08/2024 7:31 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.