Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas N/A No 877.8 (865.6, 890.1) N/A 4,062 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Butler County Urban No 965.7 (880.5, 1,056.9) 37 (13, 74) 97 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Cherokee County Urban No 987.3 (846.0, 1,145.6) 31 (5, 87) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Doniphan County Urban No 1,073.5 (842.3, 1,347.9) 17 (2, 92) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Douglas County Urban No 842.3 (774.5, 914.4) 74 (38, 91) 118 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Geary County Urban No 910.7 (766.3, 1,074.2) 50 (9, 95) 28 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Harvey County Urban No 893.8 (794.9, 1,001.5) 61 (19, 90) 62 falling falling trend -0.9 (-4.8, -0.1)
Jackson County Urban No 743.0 (598.1, 912.3) 93 (31, 102) 18 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Jefferson County Urban No 975.6 (829.9, 1,139.3) 35 (6, 89) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Johnson County Urban No 782.7 (756.2, 809.9) 87 (67, 92) 678 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Leavenworth County Urban No 916.8 (839.6, 999.2) 48 (21, 82) 107 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Linn County Urban No 976.2 (791.0, 1,191.4) 34 (4, 95) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Miami County Urban No 749.1 (651.8, 856.8) 92 (43, 100) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.4)
Osage County Urban No 896.7 (749.5, 1,064.2) 58 (11, 97) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Pottawatomie County Urban No 793.9 (668.2, 936.3) 84 (28, 100) 29 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Riley County Urban No 877.0 (777.8, 985.3) 65 (21, 92) 59 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Sedgwick County Urban No 872.2 (842.2, 903.0) 67 (45, 77) 658 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -1.1)
Shawnee County Urban No 893.9 (847.7, 941.9) 60 (34, 78) 286 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Sumner County Urban No 1,027.8 (894.5, 1,175.5) 24 (5, 74) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Wabaunsee County Urban No 846.7 (640.3, 1,097.9) 72 (7, 102) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Wyandotte County Urban No 912.3 (853.8, 973.7) 49 (26, 77) 189 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.7)
Allen County Rural No 897.3 (740.4, 1,077.6) 56 (9, 97) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.0)
Anderson County Rural No 1,139.2 (918.2, 1,397.3) 8 (2, 81) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Atchison County Rural No 884.4 (735.2, 1,054.7) 64 (11, 97) 25 falling falling trend -14.3 (-26.1, -1.0)
Barber County Rural No 964.4 (703.5, 1,290.0) 38 (3, 101) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-10.8, -0.7)
Barton County Rural No 858.7 (746.2, 983.4) 70 (22, 96) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Bourbon County Rural No 867.3 (716.6, 1,040.3) 69 (11, 98) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Brown County Rural No 1,073.7 (874.3, 1,304.8) 16 (2, 90) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Chase County Rural No 1,074.0 (732.3, 1,519.7) 15 (2, 101) 6
*
*
Chautauqua County Rural No 1,063.8 (778.4, 1,420.0) 18 (2, 100) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Cheyenne County Rural No 638.4 (395.3, 974.5) 100 (13, 102) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.7)
Clark County Rural No 778.2 (446.8, 1,260.4) 89 (2, 102) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.5)
Clay County Rural No 899.8 (718.5, 1,113.2) 55 (7, 99) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Cloud County Rural No 918.4 (733.6, 1,135.6) 47 (5, 100) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Coffey County Rural No 829.0 (646.7, 1,046.5) 76 (10, 101) 14 falling falling trend -3.6 (-11.3, -1.5)
Comanche County Rural No 1,135.2 (725.8, 1,691.8) 9 (1, 102) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.8)
Cowley County Rural No 1,017.6 (907.6, 1,137.1) 26 (6, 72) 63 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Crawford County Rural No 1,059.4 (944.4, 1,184.4) 19 (5, 63) 63 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Decatur County Rural No 718.3 (473.2, 1,045.6) 95 (9, 102) 6 stable stable trend -33.6 (-61.7, 3.0)
Dickinson County Rural No 943.4 (806.9, 1,096.3) 42 (9, 91) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Edwards County Rural No 929.4 (617.7, 1,343.5) 45 (2, 102) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.5)
Elk County Rural No 1,286.5 (930.2, 1,733.6) 4 (1, 93) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.8)
Ellis County Rural No 781.3 (665.5, 911.3) 88 (32, 100) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Ellsworth County Rural No 970.0 (747.6, 1,236.6) 36 (3, 99) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Finney County Rural No 799.1 (679.4, 933.7) 83 (29, 100) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Ford County Rural No 845.0 (717.6, 988.5) 73 (17, 98) 33 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Franklin County Rural No 1,014.2 (882.8, 1,159.6) 27 (6, 78) 43 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Gove County Rural No 981.9 (662.2, 1,400.0) 32 (2, 102) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
Graham County Rural No 629.2 (394.4, 955.7) 101 (17, 102) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.9)
Grant County Rural No 807.4 (573.7, 1,104.3) 78 (5, 102) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Gray County Rural No 867.7 (616.9, 1,186.7) 68 (4, 102) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Greenwood County Rural No 981.3 (767.7, 1,236.0) 33 (3, 97) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.4)
Hamilton County Rural No 1,324.5 (805.9, 2,042.1) 3 (1, 101) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.2)
Harper County Rural No 1,160.9 (900.0, 1,473.1) 6 (2, 90) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Haskell County Rural No 623.5 (359.2, 1,003.5) 102 (10, 102) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 2.0)
Hodgeman County Rural No 958.8 (571.0, 1,508.6) 40 (2, 102) 4
*
*
Jewell County Rural No 908.8 (641.0, 1,248.6) 51 (3, 102) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Kearny County Rural No 888.1 (586.7, 1,288.6) 63 (2, 102) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.9)
Kingman County Rural No 1,916.2 (1,610.2, 2,263.1) 1 (1, 4) 28 rising rising trend 13.3 (4.2, 35.7)
Kiowa County Rural No 1,049.1 (686.4, 1,533.8) 23 (1, 102) 6 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.4, 16.7)
Labette County Rural No 1,052.5 (913.3, 1,206.9) 21 (4, 76) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Lane County Rural No 1,209.1 (745.0, 1,851.6) 5 (1, 102) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
Lincoln County Rural No 688.2 (436.6, 1,031.3) 98 (7, 102) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Logan County Rural No 897.0 (576.6, 1,331.4) 57 (2, 102) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.4)
Lyon County Rural No 947.5 (826.3, 1,081.3) 41 (10, 87) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Marion County Rural No 892.0 (739.9, 1,066.1) 62 (10, 98) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9)
Marshall County Rural No 939.9 (765.4, 1,142.3) 43 (6, 98) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
McPherson County Rural No 776.9 (680.3, 883.5) 90 (39, 100) 49 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Meade County Rural No 1,159.8 (834.1, 1,570.2) 7 (1, 97) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.4)
Mitchell County Rural No 800.5 (596.2, 1,051.5) 81 (10, 102) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Montgomery County Rural No 931.4 (826.4, 1,046.1) 44 (13, 88) 58 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.7, -0.7)
Morris County Rural No 992.8 (766.8, 1,264.8) 30 (2, 98) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Morton County Rural No 1,340.2 (926.6, 1,873.6) 2 (1, 96) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.3)
Nemaha County Rural No 1,000.7 (816.5, 1,214.4) 28 (4, 94) 22 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 11.0)
Neosho County Rural No 1,087.3 (927.0, 1,267.3) 14 (2, 75) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Ness County Rural No 800.3 (523.3, 1,172.1) 82 (4, 102) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.4)
Norton County Rural No 696.4 (491.2, 958.1) 97 (16, 102) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Osborne County Rural No 900.6 (646.3, 1,222.5) 54 (3, 102) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Ottawa County Rural No 806.5 (588.9, 1,077.9) 79 (8, 102) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Pawnee County Rural No 790.6 (588.2, 1,038.9) 86 (11, 102) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Phillips County Rural No 993.2 (752.9, 1,285.4) 29 (2, 100) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Pratt County Rural No 963.0 (773.2, 1,185.5) 39 (4, 97) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Rawlins County Rural No 846.8 (567.6, 1,215.3) 71 (3, 102) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.6)
Reno County Rural No 802.2 (732.0, 877.4) 80 (46, 95) 98 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Republic County Rural No 1,108.8 (857.6, 1,410.1) 11 (2, 93) 14 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.2, 18.3)
Rice County Rural No 1,058.4 (856.5, 1,293.4) 20 (2, 89) 19 falling falling trend -1.4 (-9.5, -0.1)
Rooks County Rural No 791.3 (577.8, 1,058.5) 85 (8, 102) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.7, -0.7)
Rush County Rural No 1,099.0 (781.9, 1,500.9) 13 (2, 99) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Russell County Rural No 1,049.6 (835.4, 1,301.6) 22 (2, 92) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Saline County Rural No 895.2 (813.5, 982.9) 59 (22, 87) 90 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Scott County Rural No 718.6 (502.9, 995.6) 94 (13, 102) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Seward County Rural No 840.3 (677.4, 1,030.4) 75 (12, 100) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Sheridan County Rural No 749.8 (468.0, 1,140.4) 91 (4, 102) 5
*
*
Sherman County Rural No 657.7 (466.4, 901.0) 99 (28, 102) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Smith County Rural No 922.9 (665.8, 1,244.9) 46 (3, 102) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.0)
Stafford County Rural No 708.6 (476.8, 1,013.1) 96 (11, 102) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.5)
Stevens County Rural No 903.4 (628.1, 1,256.7) 53 (2, 102) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.7)
Thomas County Rural No 876.8 (667.8, 1,130.3) 66 (5, 102) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Trego County Rural No 1,128.5 (800.9, 1,545.4) 10 (2, 99) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Washington County Rural No 907.7 (691.5, 1,170.0) 52 (4, 101) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Wichita County Rural No 816.9 (477.8, 1,304.4) 77 (2, 102) 4
*
*
Wilson County Rural No 1,027.1 (831.6, 1,254.8) 25 (3, 92) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Woodson County Rural No 1,104.6 (789.5, 1,503.7) 12 (2, 99) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.2)
Greeley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 4:05 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top