Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas No 134.9 (132.6, 137.3) N/A 2,622 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Rice County No 133.2 (96.5, 181.1) 59 (6, 89) 10 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.0, -0.1)
Wyandotte County No 148.5 (137.3, 160.4) 39 (18, 60) 135 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.2)
Elk County Yes 112.3 (63.7, 206.8) 80 (5, 89) 3 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.0)
Jackson County Yes 88.8 (65.4, 119.7) 89 (54, 89) 10 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Barber County Yes 91.0 (53.8, 152.2) 88 (16, 89) 4 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Miami County Yes 121.0 (101.8, 143.3) 71 (29, 87) 29 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Clay County Yes 115.3 (80.6, 162.7) 77 (12, 89) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Leavenworth County No 137.7 (123.0, 153.8) 51 (21, 75) 67 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Jefferson County Yes 121.1 (95.8, 151.8) 70 (20, 88) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Coffey County Yes 109.2 (75.5, 155.4) 85 (15, 89) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Johnson County Yes 114.5 (109.6, 119.6) 78 (61, 84) 429 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Seward County Yes 110.6 (83.5, 143.8) 81 (25, 89) 12 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Douglas County Yes 115.6 (103.6, 128.5) 76 (50, 86) 72 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Atchison County No 135.6 (105.8, 171.7) 55 (10, 87) 15 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Reno County Yes 120.1 (106.1, 135.5) 72 (40, 86) 61 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Sedgwick County No 139.1 (133.3, 145.2) 48 (32, 63) 442 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Washington County Yes 110.3 (74.4, 164.6) 82 (12, 89) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Ellis County Yes 113.7 (92.3, 138.9) 79 (32, 89) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Allen County Yes 119.8 (90.9, 156.5) 73 (19, 89) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Finney County No 131.0 (107.0, 158.6) 64 (17, 86) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Stafford County No 133.2 (77.6, 217.4) 60 (2, 89) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.2)
Sumner County No 151.1 (125.9, 180.6) 33 (8, 78) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Cherokee County No 156.0 (128.5, 188.4) 28 (6, 76) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Ford County No 136.6 (112.1, 164.9) 54 (11, 85) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Montgomery County No 132.8 (112.9, 155.6) 61 (18, 84) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Pottawatomie County No 132.3 (106.1, 163.1) 62 (13, 86) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Pratt County No 138.0 (103.0, 183.3) 50 (6, 88) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Trego County No 153.7 (98.7, 246.4) 29 (2, 89) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Wabaunsee County Yes 117.1 (78.2, 171.8) 75 (9, 89) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Gray County No 143.1 (91.6, 214.1) 43 (2, 89) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.6)
Greenwood County No 204.4 (146.9, 280.3) 3 (2, 72) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Lyon County No 139.3 (116.7, 165.1) 47 (13, 83) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Marion County No 149.9 (116.2, 192.0) 35 (4, 84) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Osage County No 144.9 (115.6, 180.7) 42 (7, 84) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Riley County No 129.3 (111.4, 149.3) 65 (23, 83) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Scott County No 141.5 (90.8, 214.2) 45 (2, 89) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Shawnee County No 149.4 (139.9, 159.4) 37 (19, 55) 201 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Bourbon County No 148.9 (116.8, 188.0) 38 (5, 84) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Butler County No 148.5 (132.1, 166.5) 40 (14, 68) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Chase County No 174.4 (95.5, 300.6) 13 (1, 89) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Cowley County No 161.5 (138.7, 187.3) 19 (6, 65) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Franklin County No 159.6 (133.5, 189.7) 23 (5, 73) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
McPherson County No 126.1 (106.2, 149.3) 68 (21, 86) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Mitchell County Yes 108.3 (68.5, 166.3) 86 (11, 89) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Phillips County No 134.0 (84.6, 205.3) 58 (3, 89) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Saline County No 148.2 (131.2, 166.8) 41 (14, 68) 60 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Thomas County No 134.5 (92.8, 190.1) 56 (4, 89) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Anderson County No 195.4 (150.7, 252.1) 6 (2, 66) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Dickinson County No 134.3 (109.7, 163.9) 57 (13, 86) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Ottawa County No 151.1 (103.3, 217.8) 34 (2, 89) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Cloud County No 128.0 (91.5, 176.3) 66 (8, 89) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Lincoln County No 149.7 (89.7, 247.7) 36 (2, 89) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
Ness County Yes 109.2 (57.9, 201.2) 84 (5, 89) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Rooks County No 158.4 (108.2, 228.8) 26 (2, 88) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Harvey County No 136.6 (116.4, 159.8) 53 (15, 83) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Marshall County No 138.5 (104.9, 182.0) 49 (7, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Nemaha County No 157.1 (118.0, 206.7) 27 (3, 85) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Sherman County No 125.2 (82.0, 186.4) 69 (6, 89) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Doniphan County No 181.9 (135.1, 242.2) 10 (2, 80) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Geary County No 172.6 (140.3, 209.8) 14 (3, 70) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Meade County No 159.4 (103.0, 241.1) 24 (2, 89) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Russell County No 189.1 (135.5, 258.9) 9 (2, 80) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Crawford County No 172.3 (149.2, 198.2) 15 (4, 54) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Linn County No 136.7 (101.7, 182.3) 52 (7, 88) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Pawnee County No 151.2 (103.6, 217.7) 32 (2, 89) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Barton County No 126.9 (104.7, 153.1) 67 (21, 86) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Harper County No 167.4 (119.9, 232.7) 17 (2, 86) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.3)
Osborne County No 143.0 (87.5, 230.2) 44 (2, 89) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.4)
Wilson County No 131.3 (96.0, 178.0) 63 (8, 89) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.5)
Woodson County No 140.8 (73.8, 249.8) 46 (2, 89) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.3)
Labette County No 151.7 (123.9, 184.6) 31 (6, 79) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Neosho County No 160.0 (127.9, 198.5) 22 (4, 80) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.2)
Chautauqua County No 167.6 (98.6, 273.8) 16 (2, 89) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.6)
Ellsworth County No 160.2 (107.3, 233.8) 21 (2, 88) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Rawlins County Yes 107.0 (59.1, 200.3) 87 (5, 89) 3 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.6)
Brown County No 175.3 (135.1, 225.8) 12 (2, 79) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Morris County No 158.6 (106.0, 231.7) 25 (2, 88) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.4)
Republic County No 201.5 (135.2, 293.2) 4 (1, 85) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.9)
Rush County No 191.4 (120.4, 299.6) 8 (1, 88) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.7)
Stevens County No 153.4 (99.5, 227.9) 30 (2, 89) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.4)
Decatur County No 207.8 (117.4, 345.8) 2 (1, 88) 5 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.8, 4.8)
Kingman County No 362.8 (288.3, 452.6) 1 (1, 3) 19 rising rising trend 18.7 (3.1, 36.7)
Clark County No 162.3 (88.0, 290.7) 18 (1, 89) 3
*
*
Edwards County No 193.4 (110.8, 319.3) 7 (1, 89) 4
*
*
Grant County No 196.9 (139.9, 270.0) 5 (2, 81) 8
*
*
Jewell County Yes 117.4 (70.0, 207.0) 74 (5, 89) 4
*
*
Kiowa County No 160.9 (88.4, 278.1) 20 (2, 89) 3
*
*
Norton County Yes 110.2 (66.5, 177.0) 83 (9, 89) 5
*
*
Smith County No 180.4 (112.2, 281.7) 11 (2, 87) 6
*
*
Cheyenne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gove County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hodgeman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kearny County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lane County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wichita County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/20/2024 3:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top