Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2012-2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas Yes 141.9 (139.4, 144.4) 2,619 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
United States Yes 137.7 (137.4, 137.9) 280,047 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
Woodson County No 246.3 (152.8, 379.6) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.0)
Chase County No 236.2 (154.4, 358.8) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Linn County No 207.0 (159.9, 265.2) 15 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.3)
Cloud County No 200.3 (154.7, 256.8) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Clark County No 195.9 (107.1, 339.0) 3
*
*
Meade County No 186.5 (121.0, 277.8) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.7)
Decatur County No 185.2 (118.7, 290.3) 6 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.3, 5.3)
Kearny County No 183.1 (113.5, 281.8) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.9)
Chautauqua County No 183.1 (117.7, 280.7) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.2)
Phillips County No 182.9 (127.9, 257.3) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Labette County No 180.6 (149.6, 216.6) 27 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Atchison County No 180.5 (146.7, 220.5) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Neosho County No 179.7 (146.6, 218.8) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.6)
Geary County No 179.5 (147.7, 215.8) 23 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Cherokee County No 174.8 (145.0, 209.5) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Kingman County No 174.5 (124.2, 240.0) 10 stable stable trend 38.4 (-12.8, 119.8)
Wyandotte County No 168.9 (156.7, 181.9) 147 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Stevens County No 168.1 (111.6, 244.5) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.0, 5.1)
Dickinson County No 167.4 (138.4, 201.4) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Ellsworth County No 167.0 (117.7, 235.0) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Edwards County No 164.8 (100.7, 265.0) 4
*
*
Smith County No 164.6 (104.7, 255.4) 6
*
*
Grant County No 163.6 (111.1, 232.1) 6
*
*
Allen County No 163.0 (127.6, 206.3) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Doniphan County No 162.7 (116.9, 222.1) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Barton County No 162.0 (137.4, 190.2) 34 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Osborne County No 161.7 (109.4, 241.2) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.0, 3.2)
Montgomery County No 161.4 (139.7, 186.0) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Leavenworth County Yes 159.5 (142.8, 177.7) 69 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Rooks County Yes 158.5 (106.5, 230.6) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Crawford County Yes 157.4 (135.9, 181.7) 41 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Pawnee County Yes 157.1 (107.8, 224.5) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Saline County Yes 156.4 (138.7, 175.9) 60 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Brown County Yes 155.5 (118.3, 202.7) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Wilson County Yes 155.1 (117.5, 203.5) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.0)
Cowley County Yes 154.1 (132.1, 179.0) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Greenwood County Yes 153.9 (110.6, 213.2) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Butler County Yes 151.4 (134.5, 169.9) 61 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Mitchell County Yes 150.2 (103.3, 214.5) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.3)
Shawnee County Yes 149.2 (139.6, 159.3) 194 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Republic County Yes 148.7 (98.4, 222.4) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.8)
Clay County Yes 148.1 (110.3, 197.5) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Scott County Yes 147.2 (91.6, 226.4) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Ottawa County Yes 146.4 (97.5, 214.3) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Pratt County Yes 145.8 (108.3, 193.7) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Anderson County Yes 144.8 (106.0, 196.1) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Ellis County Yes 144.5 (119.7, 173.3) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Sedgwick County Yes 144.5 (138.3, 150.9) 427 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
McPherson County Yes 144.0 (122.0, 169.4) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Logan County Yes 142.6 (80.1, 244.5) 4
*
*
Nemaha County Yes 142.0 (106.1, 188.0) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Franklin County Yes 141.7 (116.9, 170.5) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Jefferson County Yes 140.3 (112.2, 174.0) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Marion County Yes 138.7 (107.0, 178.8) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Reno County Yes 138.7 (123.7, 155.2) 69 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Pottawatomie County Yes 138.6 (111.3, 170.7) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Jackson County Yes 138.5 (105.4, 179.6) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Harvey County Yes 138.0 (117.6, 161.2) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Lyon County Yes 136.7 (114.3, 162.5) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Rawlins County Yes 134.6 (70.9, 247.5) 3 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.5)
Marshall County Yes 134.4 (101.1, 177.6) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Sherman County Yes 134.2 (92.9, 191.7) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.0)
Seward County Yes 133.5 (103.3, 169.7) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Osage County Yes 131.7 (103.0, 166.8) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Elk County Yes 130.4 (74.8, 229.6) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.2, 0.5)
Morris County Yes 129.1 (85.7, 191.5) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Sumner County Yes 129.1 (105.9, 156.4) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Lincoln County Yes 128.9 (71.1, 224.4) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.5)
Bourbon County Yes 127.4 (99.1, 162.3) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Ford County Yes 126.8 (103.0, 154.3) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Riley County Yes 126.3 (107.8, 147.1) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Douglas County Yes 126.3 (113.0, 140.8) 69 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Miami County Yes 126.3 (105.9, 149.8) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Morton County Yes 125.9 (69.8, 217.3) 3
*
*
Finney County Yes 123.7 (99.7, 151.4) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Harper County Yes 122.8 (82.0, 181.4) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 2.9)
Haskell County Yes 122.5 (68.7, 204.3) 3
*
*
Rice County Yes 121.8 (88.7, 165.2) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.3)
Johnson County Yes 120.9 (115.6, 126.5) 404 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Coffey County Yes 120.7 (86.1, 167.3) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.2)
Trego County Yes 119.6 (65.8, 212.8) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.3)
Russell County Yes 119.2 (85.4, 166.8) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Ness County Yes 118.6 (69.3, 204.0) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.4)
Washington County Yes 115.0 (77.5, 170.7) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Stafford County Yes 113.3 (65.7, 187.3) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.9)
Thomas County Yes 111.4 (74.3, 162.2) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Norton County Yes 108.9 (69.0, 170.1) 5
*
*
Barber County Yes 107.6 (67.5, 169.4) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.6)
Gray County Yes 103.4 (61.4, 164.7) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 2.1)
Rush County Yes 96.8 (53.6, 175.4) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.7, 3.1)
Jewell County Yes 96.2 (55.2, 177.3) 3
*
*
Wabaunsee County Yes 94.1 (60.8, 142.7) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Cheyenne County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gove County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hodgeman County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lane County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wichita County ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/05/2020 6:41 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top