Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Kansas N/A No 154.2 (152.2, 156.2) N/A 4,921 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.9)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Kingman County Rural No 311.7 (264.7, 365.9) 1 (1, 6) 34 rising rising trend 10.4 (2.9, 32.3)
Republic County Rural No 210.9 (165.1, 268.2) 6 (1, 78) 18 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.1, 16.8)
Nemaha County Rural No 181.8 (151.0, 217.8) 32 (4, 85) 28 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 12.2)
Edwards County Rural No 241.4 (165.7, 344.4) 3 (1, 91) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 2.9)
Lane County Rural No 194.2 (123.1, 304.8) 16 (1, 103) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Meade County Rural No 199.6 (148.3, 266.8) 12 (1, 98) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.1)
Kiowa County Rural No 171.1 (116.9, 248.2) 42 (2, 103) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Chautauqua County Rural No 193.3 (141.0, 263.4) 17 (2, 100) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.2)
Stevens County Rural No 164.5 (117.4, 227.9) 50 (3, 103) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.5)
Haskell County Rural Yes 119.5 (69.6, 193.2) 102 (7, 103) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.0)
Woodson County Rural No 174.1 (127.8, 237.5) 38 (2, 102) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
Brown County Rural No 190.5 (156.5, 230.9) 22 (3, 83) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Elk County Rural No 280.3 (205.9, 379.5) 2 (1, 52) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 1.9)
Chase County Rural No 208.5 (142.4, 298.8) 8 (1, 101) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Comanche County Rural No 152.4 (97.2, 242.6) 73 (3, 103) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Ellsworth County Rural No 187.4 (147.5, 236.6) 26 (2, 94) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Franklin County Rural No 187.9 (166.8, 211.3) 25 (6, 69) 61 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.9)
Hamilton County Rural No 210.3 (131.8, 326.5) 7 (1, 103) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.6)
Linn County Urban No 183.6 (153.4, 219.3) 29 (4, 86) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Ness County Rural No 135.1 (90.9, 202.2) 90 (6, 103) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Rush County Rural No 203.5 (151.9, 273.1) 10 (1, 97) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Seward County Rural No 192.5 (154.5, 238.6) 19 (2, 85) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Clark County Rural No 167.2 (101.5, 266.1) 47 (1, 103) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Harper County Rural No 213.4 (169.6, 267.3) 4 (2, 75) 18 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Lincoln County Rural No 126.1 (85.0, 186.3) 97 (12, 103) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Kearny County Rural No 159.5 (106.4, 233.4) 56 (2, 103) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Lyon County Rural No 176.7 (155.6, 200.1) 35 (8, 80) 56 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Pawnee County Rural No 156.7 (119.2, 204.4) 63 (6, 102) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Rice County Rural No 180.9 (147.3, 220.9) 33 (4, 92) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Trego County Rural No 170.8 (125.2, 234.9) 44 (3, 102) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Cheyenne County Rural No 161.3 (105.2, 241.5) 53 (2, 103) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Harvey County Urban No 159.3 (142.6, 177.7) 57 (24, 89) 74 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
McPherson County Rural No 139.0 (123.3, 156.4) 84 (46, 100) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Riley County Urban No 147.1 (131.8, 163.7) 76 (36, 96) 71 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Russell County Rural No 212.6 (171.0, 262.7) 5 (2, 72) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Wilson County Rural No 176.8 (145.4, 214.3) 34 (5, 93) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Cloud County Rural No 164.4 (133.3, 201.5) 51 (7, 99) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Cowley County Rural No 192.7 (173.6, 213.6) 18 (5, 56) 81 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Crawford County Rural No 189.5 (171.4, 209.1) 23 (6, 58) 84 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Doniphan County Urban No 192.4 (155.4, 236.8) 20 (3, 90) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Marion County Rural No 143.6 (120.8, 170.5) 80 (23, 101) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Neosho County Rural No 191.3 (165.2, 220.9) 21 (4, 71) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.3)
Reno County Rural No 148.7 (136.7, 161.6) 74 (42, 91) 124 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Bourbon County Rural No 158.3 (132.8, 187.6) 60 (13, 98) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Cherokee County Urban No 196.9 (173.0, 223.6) 14 (4, 60) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Clay County Rural No 158.9 (129.5, 194.3) 58 (9, 100) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Marshall County Rural No 174.9 (145.4, 209.6) 37 (5, 93) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Morris County Rural No 200.2 (155.7, 255.3) 11 (2, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Phillips County Rural No 198.1 (153.2, 254.1) 13 (2, 93) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Barton County Rural No 152.9 (134.1, 174.0) 71 (24, 95) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Butler County Urban No 159.6 (146.9, 173.1) 55 (30, 83) 124 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Dickinson County Rural No 171.8 (149.5, 196.9) 40 (9, 89) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Logan County Rural No 175.0 (116.5, 255.5) 36 (2, 103) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Mitchell County Rural No 147.6 (112.6, 191.9) 75 (9, 103) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Allen County Rural No 170.4 (142.8, 202.4) 45 (6, 93) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Gove County Rural No 138.6 (95.3, 201.0) 85 (7, 103) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Pratt County Rural No 158.7 (128.6, 194.8) 59 (9, 100) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Saline County Rural No 157.2 (143.9, 171.6) 62 (32, 88) 111 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Smith County Rural No 166.0 (119.6, 228.7) 49 (2, 103) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.5)
Atchison County Rural No 161.7 (136.8, 190.1) 52 (11, 97) 32 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Barber County Rural No 186.2 (139.1, 246.9) 27 (2, 99) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Osborne County Rural No 138.4 (100.9, 190.4) 86 (10, 103) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Scott County Rural Yes 121.2 (87.3, 167.4) 100 (22, 103) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Stafford County Rural No 156.2 (111.1, 216.8) 65 (4, 103) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Washington County Rural No 126.4 (97.4, 164.3) 96 (31, 103) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Ellis County Rural No 139.5 (121.1, 160.1) 83 (41, 101) 44 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Ford County Rural No 154.7 (131.6, 181.5) 67 (18, 98) 36 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Geary County Urban No 183.6 (155.3, 215.5) 30 (4, 82) 31 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Hodgeman County Rural No 173.3 (111.1, 270.6) 39 (1, 103) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Jefferson County Urban No 166.7 (144.1, 192.3) 48 (12, 90) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Ottawa County Rural No 143.8 (108.1, 189.2) 78 (9, 103) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Sherman County Rural No 124.4 (91.9, 166.8) 99 (26, 103) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Sumner County Urban No 188.2 (166.5, 212.2) 24 (5, 65) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Wabaunsee County Urban No 141.8 (111.0, 180.3) 81 (15, 103) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Anderson County Rural No 195.1 (159.8, 237.0) 15 (3, 82) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Finney County Rural No 154.1 (131.0, 180.6) 69 (18, 98) 34 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Greenwood County Rural No 182.0 (144.9, 228.2) 31 (3, 96) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Osage County Urban No 152.4 (129.4, 178.8) 72 (21, 98) 34 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Shawnee County Urban No 157.9 (150.2, 166.1) 61 (38, 78) 333 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Douglas County Urban No 138.1 (127.9, 148.9) 87 (61, 98) 141 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Gray County Rural No 169.2 (125.6, 224.4) 46 (3, 102) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Jewell County Rural No 156.4 (113.2, 217.7) 64 (4, 103) 9 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Pottawatomie County Urban No 137.7 (118.4, 159.4) 88 (41, 101) 38 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Grant County Rural No 137.1 (96.1, 192.9) 89 (9, 103) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Miami County Urban No 134.5 (119.4, 151.2) 91 (52, 101) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Johnson County Urban No 129.0 (125.0, 133.1) 94 (79, 99) 819 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 171.2 (153.5, 190.8) 41 (14, 78) 73 falling falling trend -1.3 (-5.6, -0.5)
Sedgwick County Urban No 155.2 (150.2, 160.3) 66 (47, 77) 769 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -1.0)
Thomas County Rural No 143.7 (112.4, 182.1) 79 (16, 103) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Sheridan County Rural Yes 120.8 (79.2, 184.6) 101 (14, 103) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Leavenworth County Urban No 153.9 (142.2, 166.5) 70 (37, 87) 132 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Jackson County Urban No 132.3 (109.0, 159.8) 93 (38, 103) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Graham County Rural Yes 107.9 (71.8, 168.1) 103 (37, 103) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.5)
Rooks County Rural No 145.0 (109.2, 191.2) 77 (9, 103) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -1.1)
Norton County Rural No 125.2 (91.5, 169.5) 98 (19, 103) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.7)
Labette County Rural No 170.9 (149.2, 195.3) 43 (11, 87) 48 falling falling trend -2.5 (-11.3, -0.6)
Wyandotte County Urban No 184.1 (171.8, 197.1) 28 (11, 52) 179 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.7, -1.4)
Coffey County Rural No 139.9 (112.2, 173.7) 82 (20, 103) 18 falling falling trend -3.0 (-13.2, -1.1)
Rawlins County Rural No 127.9 (87.3, 190.5) 95 (10, 103) 7 falling falling trend -10.5 (-25.1, -1.0)
Decatur County Rural No 134.5 (88.4, 202.2) 92 (6, 103) 7 stable stable trend -27.8 (-50.4, 0.0)
Morton County Rural No 208.2 (147.1, 295.2) 9 (1, 100) 8
*
*
Stanton County Rural No 154.2 (82.1, 276.6) 68 (1, 103) 3
*
*
Wichita County Rural No 159.7 (86.6, 274.8) 54 (1, 103) 4
*
*
Greeley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/11/2024 8:52 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top