Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas N/A No 14.0 (13.4, 14.5) N/A 497 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
United States N/A No 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Nemaha County Rural No 19.7 (10.7, 34.0) 11 (1, 37) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.0)
Allen County Rural No 23.2 (12.9, 38.4) 4 (1, 36) 3
*
*
Marshall County Rural No 20.2 (11.9, 33.6) 9 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Osage County Urban No 16.0 (9.2, 26.3) 19 (2, 37) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-20.3, 15.1)
Pottawatomie County Urban No 12.6 (7.4, 20.2) 29 (6, 37) 4
*
*
Marion County Rural No 20.1 (11.3, 33.8) 10 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.2)
Bourbon County Rural No 20.2 (12.1, 32.2) 8 (1, 36) 4
*
*
Jefferson County Urban No 16.1 (9.6, 25.7) 17 (2, 37) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Miami County Urban Yes 8.4 (5.1, 13.3) 37 (21, 37) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.9)
Geary County Urban No 17.1 (10.5, 26.1) 15 (2, 37) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Lyon County Rural No 11.9 (7.3, 18.4) 31 (10, 37) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.0)
Cherokee County Urban No 18.8 (12.0, 28.4) 13 (1, 35) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Sumner County Urban No 14.0 (8.9, 21.4) 23 (5, 37) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -1.0)
Ford County Rural No 14.5 (9.4, 21.5) 22 (5, 37) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.5, -0.2)
McPherson County Rural No 11.4 (7.1, 17.4) 32 (11, 37) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Barton County Rural No 15.4 (10.0, 23.0) 21 (3, 37) 6 falling falling trend -3.7 (-16.7, -1.6)
Finney County Rural No 16.1 (10.6, 23.3) 18 (3, 37) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Neosho County Rural No 24.1 (15.9, 35.6) 3 (1, 28) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Franklin County Rural No 19.6 (13.0, 28.6) 12 (1, 35) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.6)
Crawford County Rural No 12.5 (8.4, 18.0) 30 (10, 37) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Ellis County Rural No 17.8 (11.9, 25.7) 14 (2, 35) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Seward County Rural No 31.2 (21.0, 44.4) 1 (1, 17) 6
*
*
Dickinson County Rural No 23.0 (15.3, 33.6) 5 (1, 30) 6 rising rising trend 7.5 (0.5, 32.7)
Harvey County Urban No 16.1 (11.2, 22.7) 16 (4, 36) 8
*
*
Labette County Rural No 26.5 (18.4, 37.2) 2 (1, 20) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Riley County Urban No 15.7 (11.1, 21.4) 20 (5, 36) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Reno County Rural No 10.1 (7.2, 13.9) 35 (19, 37) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Cowley County Rural No 21.6 (15.7, 29.1) 7 (1, 26) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Saline County Rural No 12.7 (9.2, 17.0) 28 (12, 37) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Leavenworth County Urban No 10.0 (7.4, 13.4) 36 (19, 37) 10 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.6, -3.2)
Montgomery County Rural No 21.7 (15.8, 29.2) 6 (1, 26) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.4)
Butler County Urban No 13.4 (9.9, 17.7) 25 (10, 37) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Douglas County Urban No 10.3 (7.8, 13.4) 34 (20, 37) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Wyandotte County Urban No 13.6 (11.2, 16.4) 24 (13, 34) 24 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Shawnee County Urban No 13.0 (11.0, 15.4) 27 (15, 35) 30 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -2.1)
Johnson County Urban No 10.8 (9.7, 12.0) 33 (25, 37) 73 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Sedgwick County Urban No 13.4 (12.0, 14.8) 26 (16, 31) 79 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Anderson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atchison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barber County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chase County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chautauqua County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cloud County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coffey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doniphan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gove County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greenwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hodgeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jewell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kearny County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Linn County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meade County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ness County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osborne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ottawa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pratt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rawlins County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Republic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rice County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rooks County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Russell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stafford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trego County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabaunsee County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wichita County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/14/2024 2:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top