Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate ascending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Kansas N/A No 36.4 (35.5, 37.3) N/A 1,342 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.3, -2.5)
United States N/A No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Elk County Rural No 73.5 (44.1, 125.5) 1 (1, 61) 4
*
*
Geary County Urban No 66.3 (52.4, 82.5) 2 (1, 25) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Kingman County Rural No 61.4 (42.8, 86.9) 3 (1, 51) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6)
Brown County Rural No 59.5 (41.9, 82.8) 4 (1, 53) 8
*
*
Rush County Rural No 59.5 (33.1, 104.5) 5 (1, 67) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.4)
Cherokee County Urban No 59.0 (46.9, 73.7) 6 (1, 36) 17 falling falling trend -2.6 (-10.8, -0.9)
Barber County Rural No 56.3 (34.1, 91.1) 7 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Rooks County Rural No 54.3 (33.9, 85.1) 8 (1, 65) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.4)
Wilson County Rural No 52.4 (35.5, 75.6) 9 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Linn County Urban No 52.0 (37.2, 71.9) 10 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.7)
Neosho County Rural No 51.8 (39.3, 67.4) 11 (1, 51) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Sumner County Urban No 51.4 (41.1, 64.0) 12 (2, 47) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Doniphan County Urban No 50.9 (34.2, 74.6) 13 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.9)
Marshall County Rural No 50.4 (34.8, 71.5) 14 (1, 62) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.1)
Pawnee County Rural No 50.4 (32.7, 76.7) 15 (1, 65) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.7)
Russell County Rural No 49.9 (33.5, 73.9) 16 (1, 65) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Wyandotte County Urban No 48.7 (44.0, 53.7) 17 (7, 34) 84 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -2.3)
Clay County Rural No 48.4 (32.9, 70.1) 18 (1, 65) 7
*
*
Osage County Urban No 47.4 (35.7, 62.5) 19 (2, 57) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Cowley County Rural No 47.1 (38.8, 56.9) 20 (4, 48) 23 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.4, 10.1)
Allen County Rural No 46.8 (33.7, 64.0) 21 (2, 62) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Franklin County Rural No 46.4 (36.8, 58.1) 22 (4, 54) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.3)
Labette County Rural No 45.6 (35.7, 57.9) 23 (4, 57) 15 falling falling trend -2.9 (-15.9, -0.6)
Cloud County Rural No 45.1 (30.5, 65.5) 24 (1, 66) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Rice County Rural No 45.0 (30.5, 65.1) 25 (1, 65) 6 stable stable trend 17.8 (-6.0, 60.8)
Montgomery County Rural No 44.8 (36.6, 54.5) 26 (6, 53) 21 falling falling trend -3.6 (-12.4, -1.7)
Crawford County Rural No 44.3 (36.1, 53.9) 27 (6, 53) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Anderson County Rural No 43.2 (28.3, 64.5) 28 (2, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Pratt County Rural No 42.9 (28.9, 62.6) 29 (2, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.4)
Leavenworth County Urban No 42.6 (36.9, 49.0) 30 (11, 49) 42 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Wabaunsee County Urban No 42.4 (26.9, 65.4) 31 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Harper County Rural No 41.7 (25.0, 68.0) 32 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.5)
Greenwood County Rural No 40.9 (24.0, 67.5) 33 (1, 67) 4 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.9, -0.1)
Miami County Urban No 39.7 (31.9, 48.9) 34 (11, 60) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.1)
Scott County Rural No 39.5 (22.4, 67.0) 35 (2, 67) 3
*
*
Jackson County Urban No 39.2 (27.5, 54.8) 36 (6, 67) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Phillips County Rural No 39.0 (21.4, 67.9) 37 (2, 67) 3
*
*
Sedgwick County Urban No 38.9 (36.6, 41.2) 38 (25, 48) 239 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -2.2)
Atchison County Rural No 38.1 (27.1, 52.5) 39 (6, 67) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-19.9, -1.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 37.8 (28.1, 50.3) 40 (9, 66) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Coffey County Rural No 37.7 (24.6, 57.0) 41 (5, 67) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Butler County Urban No 37.3 (31.5, 43.8) 42 (20, 59) 31 falling falling trend -3.5 (-10.8, -1.6)
Bourbon County Rural No 37.2 (25.9, 52.2) 43 (6, 67) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Shawnee County Urban No 37.1 (33.7, 40.7) 44 (27, 54) 93 falling falling trend -5.8 (-11.9, -3.0)
Marion County Rural No 36.3 (25.9, 50.9) 45 (9, 67) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Sherman County Rural No 36.1 (20.9, 60.3) 46 (3, 67) 3 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.5)
Saline County Rural No 36.0 (30.3, 42.6) 47 (21, 61) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Dickinson County Rural No 35.6 (26.2, 47.8) 48 (13, 67) 10 falling falling trend -8.5 (-27.3, -0.4)
Washington County Rural No 34.3 (20.1, 57.8) 49 (4, 67) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.0)
Reno County Rural No 34.1 (28.9, 40.1) 50 (27, 63) 32 falling falling trend -5.2 (-12.5, -2.2)
Mitchell County Rural No 33.5 (18.7, 57.6) 51 (4, 67) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Pottawatomie County Urban No 31.9 (23.2, 42.8) 52 (19, 67) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Morris County Rural No 31.7 (18.3, 54.9) 53 (7, 67) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.6)
Barton County Rural No 31.3 (23.7, 40.9) 54 (23, 67) 12 falling falling trend -8.8 (-23.0, -1.6)
Riley County Urban No 31.3 (24.8, 38.9) 55 (28, 67) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Douglas County Urban No 30.6 (26.1, 35.6) 56 (36, 66) 35 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Ford County Rural No 29.9 (21.7, 40.0) 57 (22, 67) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Nemaha County Rural No 29.9 (19.0, 45.8) 58 (16, 67) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Harvey County Urban No 29.8 (23.5, 37.6) 59 (32, 67) 16 falling falling trend -2.4 (-11.9, -1.2)
Ellsworth County Rural No 29.8 (17.0, 51.1) 60 (10, 67) 3
*
*
Lyon County Rural No 29.0 (21.7, 38.0) 61 (29, 67) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Thomas County Rural No 28.9 (16.3, 48.5) 62 (9, 67) 3 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -1.0)
Finney County Rural No 27.8 (20.2, 37.2) 63 (29, 67) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.3)
Ellis County Rural No 27.5 (19.8, 37.3) 64 (28, 67) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.9)
Johnson County Urban No 25.9 (24.2, 27.7) 65 (55, 67) 181 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.3, -3.9)
McPherson County Rural No 25.3 (19.3, 33.0) 66 (43, 67) 12 falling falling trend -3.1 (-12.3, -1.3)
Seward County Rural Yes 24.8 (15.7, 37.0) 67 (29, 67) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.4)
Chase County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chautauqua County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gove County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hodgeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jewell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kearny County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meade County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ness County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osborne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ottawa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rawlins County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Republic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stafford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trego County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallace County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wichita County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top