Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas No 166.3 (164.3, 168.3) 5,488 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
United States No 163.5 (163.3, 163.7) 586,354 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
Allen County No 200.6 (171.9, 233.2) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Anderson County No 190.3 (156.5, 230.3) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Atchison County No 181.9 (156.5, 210.4) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Barber County No 171.6 (129.9, 224.1) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Barton County No 181.0 (161.5, 202.5) 66 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Bourbon County No 186.7 (160.2, 216.7) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Brown County No 176.7 (145.9, 212.8) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Butler County No 170.9 (157.6, 184.9) 127 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Chase County No 236.4 (174.3, 317.4) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Chautauqua County No 191.0 (145.2, 250.7) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.3)
Cherokee County No 194.3 (171.0, 220.0) 53 stable stable trend -6.9 (-16.7, 4.0)
Cheyenne County Yes 154.6 (106.3, 222.7) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Clark County No 210.9 (145.2, 301.0) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Clay County No 177.6 (146.1, 214.7) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Cloud County No 188.8 (156.6, 226.5) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Coffey County No 170.2 (138.9, 207.5) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Comanche County No 231.6 (160.3, 330.3) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.7, 3.7)
Cowley County No 186.0 (168.4, 205.0) 86 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Crawford County No 183.0 (165.4, 202.0) 83 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Decatur County No 194.0 (145.9, 259.2) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.3)
Dickinson County No 190.5 (167.9, 215.6) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Doniphan County No 167.0 (132.5, 208.3) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Douglas County Yes 151.2 (140.2, 162.9) 146 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Edwards County No 176.9 (126.3, 244.6) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Elk County No 164.7 (119.2, 228.8) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Ellis County Yes 153.5 (134.6, 174.3) 50 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Ellsworth County No 166.1 (132.1, 207.8) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Finney County Yes 140.0 (121.2, 160.7) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Ford County Yes 140.8 (122.3, 161.3) 43 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Franklin County No 175.9 (155.2, 198.7) 54 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Geary County No 205.7 (179.7, 234.1) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Gove County Yes 129.0 (82.6, 195.7) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.2)
Graham County Yes 140.6 (90.8, 212.4) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Grant County No 211.4 (164.7, 266.9) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Gray County Yes 113.8 (80.1, 157.2) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Greeley County No 222.2 (122.3, 372.6) 4
*
*
Greenwood County Yes 155.0 (122.9, 194.8) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Hamilton County No 187.4 (120.6, 278.2) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Harper County No 172.5 (136.5, 216.8) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Harvey County Yes 159.8 (143.8, 177.2) 79 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Haskell County Yes 137.2 (91.1, 198.6) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.2)
Hodgeman County Yes 150.6 (97.6, 230.0) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.1)
Jackson County No 174.4 (147.4, 205.3) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Jefferson County No 166.0 (143.7, 191.0) 41 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Jewell County Yes 149.3 (109.1, 206.1) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Johnson County Yes 139.9 (135.5, 144.4) 808 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Kearny County No 207.8 (150.9, 279.6) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.8)
Kingman County Yes 136.2 (108.0, 170.7) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Kiowa County Yes 149.6 (97.6, 223.0) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Labette County No 209.2 (185.4, 235.5) 59 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Lane County No 204.0 (138.0, 299.5) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.7)
Leavenworth County No 172.7 (159.8, 186.5) 137 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
Lincoln County Yes 139.2 (93.4, 202.8) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Linn County No 202.5 (169.5, 240.7) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Logan County No 190.1 (135.2, 263.3) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Lyon County No 180.3 (160.9, 201.5) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Marion County Yes 157.9 (133.4, 186.3) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Marshall County Yes 153.9 (127.4, 185.3) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
McPherson County No 162.1 (145.1, 180.8) 73 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Meade County No 170.7 (125.4, 228.3) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Miami County Yes 159.2 (141.7, 178.4) 62 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Mitchell County Yes 150.1 (117.4, 190.7) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Montgomery County No 191.7 (174.3, 210.6) 92 stable stable trend -7.2 (-14.6, 0.9)
Morris County No 188.6 (150.7, 235.1) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Morton County No 175.0 (121.3, 246.2) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Nemaha County Yes 151.5 (124.5, 183.3) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Neosho County No 191.2 (166.4, 218.9) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Ness County Yes 158.6 (115.9, 217.2) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Norton County Yes 96.6 (68.8, 133.7) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.4)
Osage County No 179.4 (154.7, 207.4) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Osborne County No 195.5 (151.2, 252.5) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Ottawa County Yes 155.1 (118.9, 200.1) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Pawnee County No 174.3 (138.6, 217.4) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Phillips County No 191.7 (152.3, 240.1) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Pottawatomie County Yes 161.1 (138.8, 186.1) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Pratt County No 183.1 (151.8, 219.5) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Rawlins County No 184.5 (124.8, 267.2) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Reno County No 166.6 (154.6, 179.4) 149 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Republic County Yes 150.9 (116.9, 195.2) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Rice County No 162.7 (133.1, 197.4) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Riley County Yes 148.8 (133.2, 165.6) 71 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Rooks County Yes 158.3 (120.4, 206.0) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Rush County Yes 133.2 (94.3, 188.1) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Russell County Yes 129.7 (102.8, 163.2) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Saline County No 179.8 (165.7, 195.0) 123 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Scott County No 164.2 (122.1, 217.2) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Sedgwick County No 170.2 (165.2, 175.4) 894 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Seward County Yes 152.0 (127.0, 180.1) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Shawnee County No 173.9 (166.1, 181.9) 391 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Sheridan County Yes 154.4 (103.0, 227.1) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Sherman County Yes 159.7 (124.3, 203.2) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Smith County No 170.5 (130.0, 224.4) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Stafford County Yes 149.6 (110.1, 201.0) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Stanton County Yes 137.7 (82.3, 219.2) 4
*
*
Stevens County No 165.4 (122.7, 218.4) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.4)
Sumner County Yes 157.8 (138.6, 179.1) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Thomas County Yes 149.9 (117.4, 189.3) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Trego County No 166.4 (114.7, 236.9) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Wabaunsee County Yes 148.3 (115.3, 188.9) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Wallace County No 182.1 (100.5, 305.5) 4
*
*
Washington County Yes 145.5 (114.3, 184.9) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Wichita County Yes 157.5 (101.9, 236.9) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.2)
Wilson County No 199.2 (165.9, 238.0) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Woodson County No 273.0 (207.5, 355.1) 14 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 3.4)
Wyandotte County No 212.0 (201.5, 222.8) 321 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/27/2019 9:59 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top