Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2011-2015

White (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas No 164.9 (162.8, 166.9) 5,093 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
United States No 163.8 (163.6, 164.0) 499,171 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.4)
Woodson County No 272.8 (206.7, 356.3) 14 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 3.5)
Comanche County No 232.4 (160.8, 331.9) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.6)
Chase County No 229.1 (167.6, 310.1) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Greeley County No 225.2 (123.0, 379.5) 4
*
*
Clark County No 214.3 (147.3, 306.6) 7 stable stable trend 29.9 (-12.7, 93.1)
Grant County No 210.9 (163.6, 267.1) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Wyandotte County No 208.4 (196.2, 221.3) 222 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Labette County No 206.7 (182.4, 233.8) 55 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Lane County No 206.6 (139.7, 303.9) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.7)
Kearny County No 205.4 (148.4, 277.4) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Linn County No 204.0 (170.7, 242.7) 29 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Allen County No 202.6 (173.4, 235.9) 37 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Wilson County No 201.9 (168.0, 241.5) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Cherokee County No 199.0 (174.9, 225.8) 52 stable stable trend -6.4 (-16.8, 5.4)
Geary County No 198.6 (169.8, 230.6) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Osborne County No 196.9 (152.2, 254.5) 15 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.6, 1.5)
Decatur County No 196.8 (148.0, 263.0) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Phillips County No 193.8 (153.9, 242.9) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Logan County No 192.5 (136.9, 267.1) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.0)
Dickinson County No 192.2 (169.3, 217.7) 54 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Chautauqua County No 192.2 (144.8, 254.7) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Neosho County No 191.7 (166.7, 219.8) 44 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Montgomery County No 190.8 (172.7, 210.4) 86 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Morris County No 190.5 (152.1, 237.7) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Hamilton County No 189.2 (121.7, 281.1) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Anderson County No 188.6 (154.8, 228.6) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Bourbon County No 186.0 (159.2, 216.5) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Wallace County No 184.6 (101.5, 310.6) 4
*
*
Cloud County No 184.5 (152.7, 221.7) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Crawford County No 184.3 (166.4, 203.6) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Lyon County No 183.9 (164.0, 205.7) 65 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Barton County No 183.5 (163.6, 205.4) 66 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Rawlins County No 182.2 (122.2, 265.8) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.1)
Pawnee County No 181.8 (144.3, 227.2) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Cowley County No 180.2 (162.5, 199.6) 80 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Morton County No 180.2 (124.6, 254.2) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Atchison County No 180.1 (154.2, 209.4) 36 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Edwards County No 179.9 (128.3, 249.2) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.3)
Saline County No 179.8 (165.3, 195.3) 117 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Pratt County No 179.6 (148.5, 215.9) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Clay County No 179.1 (147.3, 216.7) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Osage County No 177.4 (152.6, 205.4) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Franklin County No 176.1 (155.2, 199.2) 53 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Harper County No 174.2 (137.8, 219.1) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Barber County No 173.1 (131.0, 226.2) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Leavenworth County No 173.0 (159.5, 187.4) 126 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Coffey County No 172.3 (140.5, 210.1) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Smith County No 171.1 (130.4, 225.5) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Butler County No 170.0 (156.6, 184.2) 124 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Meade County No 169.9 (124.3, 228.1) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Shawnee County No 169.8 (161.8, 178.2) 351 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Sedgwick County No 168.3 (163.0, 173.8) 785 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Brown County No 168.0 (137.4, 204.3) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
Trego County No 167.8 (115.5, 239.4) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Elk County No 167.0 (120.8, 232.5) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Jefferson County No 166.0 (143.6, 191.3) 41 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Rice County No 166.0 (135.8, 201.5) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Reno County No 165.1 (152.9, 178.1) 144 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Jackson County No 164.8 (137.6, 196.3) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Doniphan County No 162.8 (128.5, 204.3) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Scott County No 162.7 (120.5, 216.1) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Ellsworth County No 162.4 (128.5, 204.4) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Pottawatomie County Yes 161.3 (138.8, 186.5) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
McPherson County Yes 160.3 (143.2, 179.0) 71 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Stevens County Yes 159.7 (117.8, 212.1) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.5)
Wichita County Yes 159.3 (103.1, 240.0) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2)
Harvey County Yes 159.1 (142.9, 176.7) 77 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Ness County Yes 158.9 (116.1, 218.0) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Miami County Yes 158.9 (141.2, 178.3) 60 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Sumner County Yes 157.7 (138.4, 179.3) 50 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Ottawa County Yes 157.0 (120.3, 202.6) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Sherman County Yes 156.9 (121.6, 200.7) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Cheyenne County Yes 155.6 (106.8, 224.6) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Marshall County Yes 155.0 (128.3, 186.7) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Sheridan County Yes 155.0 (103.3, 228.2) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Marion County Yes 154.0 (129.9, 182.2) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Rooks County Yes 153.7 (117.1, 200.2) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.1)
Greenwood County Yes 153.3 (121.1, 193.4) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Ellis County Yes 152.8 (133.9, 173.7) 50 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Douglas County Yes 152.7 (141.2, 164.8) 137 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Hodgeman County Yes 152.3 (98.7, 233.0) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.1)
Republic County Yes 152.2 (118.0, 197.0) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Stafford County Yes 152.2 (111.9, 204.8) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Kiowa County Yes 152.0 (98.9, 227.2) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.0)
Seward County Yes 150.7 (124.9, 179.9) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Jewell County Yes 150.2 (109.7, 207.6) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Nemaha County Yes 150.1 (123.1, 182.0) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Thomas County Yes 149.4 (116.7, 189.1) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Wabaunsee County Yes 147.8 (114.6, 188.6) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Mitchell County Yes 147.4 (114.7, 188.0) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Washington County Yes 146.0 (114.7, 185.6) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Riley County Yes 145.2 (129.4, 162.4) 66 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Ford County Yes 143.8 (124.7, 165.0) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Finney County Yes 141.0 (121.6, 162.5) 40 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Lincoln County Yes 140.8 (94.3, 205.3) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Johnson County Yes 140.4 (135.9, 145.1) 769 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Haskell County Yes 139.0 (92.3, 201.4) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.5)
Kingman County Yes 137.5 (109.0, 172.4) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Rush County Yes 134.3 (95.1, 189.9) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Russell County Yes 131.2 (103.9, 165.2) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Stanton County Yes 130.9 (76.9, 211.6) 4
*
*
Gove County Yes 130.0 (83.2, 197.4) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.3)
Graham County Yes 129.0 (84.3, 195.9) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Gray County Yes 114.4 (80.5, 158.1) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Norton County Yes 97.5 (69.4, 135.1) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2019 11:43 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top