Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky *** 191.2 (189.5, 192.9) N/A 10,244 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
United States *** 155.5 (155.3, 155.6) N/A 596,800 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.6)
Whitley County *** 271.8 (249.8, 295.4) 1 (1, 22) 117 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Breathitt County *** 271.3 (235.8, 310.9) 2 (1, 44) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Owsley County *** 261.8 (207.3, 327.8) 3 (1, 99) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Wolfe County *** 260.0 (215.8, 311.4) 4 (1, 87) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Perry County *** 256.1 (232.0, 282.2) 5 (1, 39) 88 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Clay County *** 255.0 (226.2, 286.6) 6 (1, 55) 60 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Harlan County *** 253.7 (230.2, 279.1) 7 (1, 45) 91 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Nicholas County *** 247.7 (204.2, 298.5) 8 (1, 101) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Carroll County *** 247.2 (209.5, 290.1) 9 (1, 86) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Leslie County *** 246.7 (210.1, 288.3) 10 (1, 86) 34 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Powell County *** 246.6 (210.8, 286.9) 11 (1, 81) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Lawrence County *** 241.7 (211.4, 275.3) 12 (1, 76) 49 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Johnson County *** 241.1 (216.1, 268.4) 13 (1, 67) 72 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Hart County *** 238.7 (211.1, 269.2) 14 (1, 74) 56 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Estill County *** 235.6 (205.0, 270.0) 15 (1, 81) 45 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Morgan County *** 234.6 (201.2, 272.3) 16 (1, 92) 37 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
McLean County *** 234.3 (197.6, 276.5) 17 (1, 109) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Fleming County *** 232.7 (202.0, 267.2) 18 (1, 90) 43 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Monroe County *** 230.2 (196.2, 269.0) 19 (1, 105) 34 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Knox County *** 230.1 (209.4, 252.5) 20 (4, 74) 94 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Lee County *** 228.9 (186.1, 279.6) 21 (1, 116) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Floyd County *** 228.3 (208.9, 249.1) 22 (4, 73) 108 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Gallatin County *** 227.5 (184.6, 277.5) 23 (1, 114) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Martin County *** 226.9 (192.5, 266.0) 24 (1, 109) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Menifee County *** 226.8 (184.7, 276.8) 25 (1, 118) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Grant County *** 225.0 (198.8, 253.7) 26 (2, 94) 57 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Union County *** 224.6 (193.8, 259.3) 27 (2, 99) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Letcher County *** 223.1 (199.5, 249.1) 28 (4, 88) 69 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Pike County *** 223.0 (208.2, 238.6) 29 (10, 67) 180 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Robertson County *** 221.0 (155.8, 309.9) 30 (1, 120) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Bell County *** 220.7 (199.5, 243.6) 31 (5, 87) 83 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Ohio County *** 220.2 (197.2, 245.4) 32 (4, 92) 69 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lincoln County *** 219.8 (197.1, 244.5) 33 (5, 92) 71 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Lewis County *** 219.7 (189.7, 253.5) 34 (3, 107) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Russell County *** 219.3 (193.7, 247.8) 35 (4, 97) 56 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Grayson County *** 218.7 (196.4, 243.0) 36 (6, 92) 74 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7)
Bath County *** 218.3 (186.4, 254.4) 37 (2, 112) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Logan County *** 216.8 (195.4, 240.2) 38 (6, 92) 78 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Anderson County *** 216.4 (191.4, 243.8) 39 (4, 100) 57 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Simpson County *** 215.0 (188.1, 244.9) 40 (4, 113) 48 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Cumberland County *** 213.7 (175.5, 259.2) 41 (1, 118) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
McCreary County *** 213.7 (185.4, 245.1) 42 (4, 109) 44 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Knott County *** 212.8 (184.8, 244.1) 43 (4, 109) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Magoffin County *** 212.2 (180.5, 248.3) 44 (4, 114) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Pulaski County *** 210.1 (196.4, 224.7) 45 (18, 84) 181 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
Bracken County *** 209.5 (172.0, 253.5) 46 (3, 120) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Todd County *** 209.0 (177.2, 245.2) 47 (4, 118) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Montgomery County *** 209.0 (187.0, 233.0) 48 (9, 103) 68 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Webster County *** 208.9 (178.7, 243.0) 49 (3, 115) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Taylor County *** 208.5 (186.6, 232.4) 50 (9, 104) 69 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Harrison County *** 208.2 (182.9, 236.4) 51 (7, 111) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Rowan County *** 208.2 (183.2, 235.7) 52 (7, 111) 52 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Hopkins County *** 207.9 (191.7, 225.2) 53 (18, 91) 127 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Clark County *** 206.8 (188.3, 226.7) 54 (16, 102) 95 stable stable trend -6.1 (-13.6, 2.1)
Mason County *** 206.6 (180.3, 236.0) 55 (9, 113) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Washington County *** 205.3 (175.0, 239.8) 56 (6, 118) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Henry County *** 204.8 (177.0, 235.9) 57 (8, 115) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Carlisle County *** 204.7 (161.0, 258.4) 58 (1, 120) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Butler County *** 204.6 (174.8, 238.4) 59 (6, 118) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Laurel County *** 204.4 (189.7, 220.1) 60 (22, 97) 149 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Clinton County *** 204.3 (171.9, 241.6) 61 (4, 119) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Jackson County *** 203.2 (173.3, 237.2) 62 (6, 118) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Greenup County *** 202.9 (185.8, 221.4) 63 (20, 100) 107 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Trimble County *** 202.1 (164.8, 245.7) 64 (2, 120) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Marion County *** 201.0 (175.8, 229.0) 65 (11, 116) 48 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Carter County *** 200.8 (180.4, 223.0) 66 (16, 112) 74 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Wayne County *** 200.3 (177.6, 225.5) 67 (13, 112) 59 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Rockcastle County *** 200.3 (173.8, 230.0) 68 (11, 118) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Fulton County *** 200.1 (160.2, 248.2) 69 (3, 120) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Meade County *** 199.7 (177.4, 224.0) 70 (15, 113) 62 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Larue County *** 199.1 (171.0, 230.9) 71 (11, 119) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Livingston County *** 198.6 (165.7, 237.0) 72 (5, 120) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Barren County *** 197.8 (181.6, 215.2) 73 (24, 107) 113 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Breckinridge County *** 195.3 (172.4, 220.8) 74 (16, 118) 55 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Muhlenberg County *** 195.0 (176.5, 215.0) 75 (25, 112) 84 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Garrard County *** 193.9 (168.9, 221.9) 76 (14, 118) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Hardin County *** 193.0 (181.6, 204.9) 77 (41, 104) 223 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Pendleton County *** 192.6 (163.8, 225.2) 78 (13, 120) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Henderson County *** 191.7 (176.0, 208.6) 79 (35, 113) 115 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Elliott County *** 191.5 (155.2, 234.6) 80 (5, 120) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Casey County *** 191.4 (166.1, 219.9) 81 (16, 119) 43 falling falling trend -6.1 (-8.7, -3.3)
Boyd County *** 191.2 (176.5, 207.0) 82 (38, 111) 129 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Marshall County *** 190.1 (172.7, 209.1) 83 (31, 115) 92 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Metcalfe County *** 187.9 (156.3, 224.6) 84 (10, 120) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Crittenden County *** 187.4 (155.2, 225.1) 85 (9, 120) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Mercer County *** 187.1 (165.3, 211.2) 86 (29, 119) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Franklin County *** 185.7 (170.8, 201.7) 87 (46, 115) 119 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Hancock County *** 185.7 (150.3, 227.4) 88 (9, 120) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Allen County *** 183.8 (160.8, 209.3) 89 (30, 120) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Kenton County *** 183.4 (174.4, 192.7) 90 (62, 110) 328 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Madison County *** 182.3 (169.9, 195.3) 91 (58, 115) 167 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Campbell County *** 182.3 (170.9, 194.3) 92 (60, 115) 199 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Bourbon County *** 182.2 (159.5, 207.3) 93 (31, 120) 49 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Shelby County *** 181.7 (165.4, 199.2) 94 (47, 118) 96 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Daviess County *** 181.2 (170.7, 192.2) 95 (64, 113) 230 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Boyle County *** 180.9 (162.4, 201.1) 96 (38, 119) 73 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Christian County *** 180.6 (166.3, 195.8) 97 (53, 118) 120 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Nelson County *** 178.1 (161.9, 195.6) 98 (52, 120) 93 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Graves County *** 178.0 (161.4, 195.9) 99 (48, 119) 88 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Jessamine County *** 177.0 (161.7, 193.3) 100 (55, 119) 103 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
McCracken County *** 177.0 (164.8, 189.8) 101 (63, 118) 166 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Jefferson County *** 176.8 (172.9, 180.8) 102 (85, 110) 1,632 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Trigg County *** 176.6 (151.5, 205.2) 103 (34, 120) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Scott County *** 175.1 (158.4, 193.1) 104 (54, 120) 86 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Caldwell County *** 174.1 (147.8, 204.4) 105 (30, 120) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Ballard County *** 173.1 (140.0, 212.5) 106 (17, 120) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Warren County *** 172.4 (162.1, 183.2) 107 (76, 119) 217 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Bullitt County *** 171.9 (159.7, 184.8) 108 (73, 119) 157 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Edmonson County *** 170.8 (144.0, 201.7) 109 (35, 120) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Green County *** 169.3 (141.9, 201.3) 110 (34, 120) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Lyon County *** 169.1 (138.9, 205.7) 111 (26, 120) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Hickman County *** 167.6 (129.2, 216.5) 112 (18, 120) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Spencer County *** 166.8 (140.8, 196.3) 113 (42, 120) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Calloway County *** 165.8 (149.7, 183.3) 114 (70, 120) 80 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Adair County *** 165.0 (142.8, 189.9) 115 (55, 120) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Fayette County *** 161.2 (154.8, 167.6) 116 (103, 120) 513 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
Boone County *** 160.8 (150.8, 171.3) 117 (96, 120) 206 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Woodford County *** 160.0 (140.9, 181.1) 118 (71, 120) 54 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.0)
Oldham County *** 156.8 (142.8, 171.9) 119 (88, 120) 101 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Owen County *** 156.6 (128.4, 189.8) 120 (52, 120) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/13/2021 11:02 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top