Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky N/A No 1,001.2 (990.7, 1,011.7) N/A 7,153 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Woodford County Urban No 917.6 (799.9, 1,047.6) 109 (41, 120) 45 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 8.3)
Wolfe County Rural No 1,050.3 (805.3, 1,346.3) 66 (1, 120) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.5)
Whitley County Rural No 1,170.4 (1,045.3, 1,306.3) 22 (3, 92) 65 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Webster County Rural No 1,116.2 (922.3, 1,338.5) 37 (2, 118) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Wayne County Rural No 935.8 (806.7, 1,079.6) 104 (27, 120) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.1)
Washington County Rural No 983.7 (806.2, 1,188.3) 93 (7, 120) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Warren County Urban No 957.5 (891.7, 1,026.9) 96 (51, 115) 161 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Union County Rural No 1,031.5 (850.9, 1,238.7) 74 (5, 120) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Trimble County Rural No 991.8 (767.7, 1,260.5) 89 (4, 120) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Trigg County Urban No 1,054.7 (896.3, 1,233.3) 63 (5, 118) 33 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Todd County Rural No 1,136.1 (933.5, 1,370.0) 31 (2, 119) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Taylor County Rural No 1,136.2 (1,001.9, 1,283.5) 30 (5, 105) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.1)
Spencer County Urban No 986.4 (813.7, 1,184.8) 91 (7, 120) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
Simpson County Rural No 1,001.5 (845.7, 1,177.7) 85 (9, 120) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Shelby County Urban No 948.6 (847.9, 1,057.9) 98 (38, 119) 67 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.1)
Scott County Urban No 965.0 (856.6, 1,083.2) 95 (31, 119) 61 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Russell County Rural No 1,059.3 (911.5, 1,224.4) 60 (8, 118) 37 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.0)
Rowan County Rural No 1,022.4 (873.3, 1,189.5) 79 (9, 119) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.2)
Rockcastle County Rural No 1,074.1 (910.8, 1,258.2) 53 (5, 118) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Robertson County Rural No 633.7 (361.7, 1,031.4) 120 (15, 120) 3
*
*
Pulaski County Rural No 1,073.7 (991.0, 1,161.6) 54 (17, 100) 127 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.1)
Powell County Rural No 1,304.0 (1,077.5, 1,564.0) 7 (1, 97) 25 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Pike County Rural No 1,033.7 (947.6, 1,125.6) 73 (23, 108) 110 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.6, -1.0)
Perry County Rural No 1,322.6 (1,173.5, 1,485.5) 6 (1, 53) 60 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Pendleton County Urban No 1,079.6 (887.8, 1,299.9) 51 (2, 119) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Owsley County Rural No 1,344.1 (1,000.5, 1,767.7) 3 (1, 118) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Owen County Rural No 992.0 (806.7, 1,207.0) 88 (7, 120) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Oldham County Urban No 866.9 (778.1, 962.9) 117 (70, 120) 74 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Ohio County Rural No 1,212.6 (1,066.9, 1,372.7) 15 (1, 88) 51 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Nicholas County Rural No 1,068.0 (821.8, 1,365.0) 56 (1, 120) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Nelson County Urban No 1,097.5 (988.4, 1,215.1) 41 (9, 102) 77 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.0, 9.7)
Muhlenberg County Rural No 943.4 (834.8, 1,062.2) 100 (34, 119) 55 falling falling trend -2.2 (-7.2, -0.9)
Morgan County Rural No 1,068.4 (877.2, 1,288.8) 55 (2, 119) 23 stable stable trend -5.3 (-18.3, 0.4)
Montgomery County Rural No 1,148.0 (1,007.5, 1,302.6) 28 (4, 106) 50 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Monroe County Rural No 1,164.0 (964.0, 1,393.6) 23 (1, 117) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Metcalfe County Rural No 1,187.5 (977.3, 1,429.4) 18 (1, 116) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Mercer County Rural No 1,091.3 (951.1, 1,246.4) 45 (7, 112) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Menifee County Rural No 1,262.5 (992.0, 1,583.7) 12 (1, 116) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.7)
Meade County Urban No 1,083.9 (942.8, 1,240.2) 49 (6, 115) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.4, 0.0)
McLean County Urban No 1,014.0 (811.6, 1,251.5) 82 (4, 120) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
McCreary County Rural No 1,238.0 (1,048.9, 1,451.5) 14 (1, 103) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
McCracken County Urban No 889.1 (818.0, 964.7) 114 (70, 120) 117 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Mason County Rural No 1,104.1 (936.0, 1,293.3) 39 (4, 115) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Martin County Rural No 1,130.8 (915.4, 1,381.3) 32 (1, 119) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Marshall County Rural No 1,101.6 (990.0, 1,222.3) 40 (8, 103) 72 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Marion County Rural No 905.6 (761.3, 1,069.1) 110 (29, 120) 29 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Magoffin County Rural No 1,034.6 (836.4, 1,265.4) 71 (3, 120) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-13.7, -0.5)
Madison County Rural No 936.3 (860.7, 1,016.8) 103 (52, 118) 117 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Lyon County Rural No 944.4 (760.5, 1,159.0) 99 (12, 120) 19 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.2)
Logan County Rural No 1,030.4 (905.7, 1,167.4) 75 (13, 117) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Livingston County Urban No 1,256.0 (1,037.2, 1,507.2) 13 (1, 108) 24 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
Lincoln County Rural No 1,083.3 (947.4, 1,233.1) 50 (7, 114) 47 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.7, 0.2)
Lewis County Rural No 1,179.0 (988.4, 1,395.5) 21 (1, 113) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 1.0)
Letcher County Rural No 1,034.5 (896.0, 1,188.5) 72 (10, 117) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Leslie County Rural No 1,297.7 (1,073.5, 1,555.2) 8 (1, 98) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Lee County Rural No 1,332.7 (1,044.2, 1,675.8) 4 (1, 112) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 1.0)
Lawrence County Urban No 1,331.8 (1,136.5, 1,550.7) 5 (1, 84) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Laurel County Rural No 1,055.9 (965.3, 1,152.7) 62 (19, 106) 103 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Larue County Urban No 1,035.2 (858.7, 1,237.3) 70 (5, 119) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Knox County Rural No 1,202.9 (1,071.8, 1,345.6) 16 (2, 82) 62 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.5, 0.3)
Knott County Rural No 891.8 (734.4, 1,073.0) 113 (23, 120) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Kenton County Urban No 948.7 (892.3, 1,007.6) 97 (59, 115) 220 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -1.4)
Johnson County Rural No 1,060.3 (917.2, 1,219.1) 59 (7, 116) 41 falling falling trend -8.7 (-19.6, -0.8)
Jessamine County Urban No 895.5 (803.9, 994.6) 112 (56, 120) 72 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Jefferson County Urban No 938.5 (914.1, 963.3) 101 (81, 109) 1,157 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Jackson County Rural No 926.7 (748.6, 1,134.5) 106 (11, 120) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Hopkins County Rural No 1,025.9 (927.8, 1,131.6) 78 (22, 113) 82 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Hickman County Rural No 994.1 (752.0, 1,289.3) 87 (3, 120) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Henry County Urban No 1,157.0 (977.2, 1,360.3) 25 (1, 115) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.5, 0.9)
Henderson County Rural No 1,035.5 (935.9, 1,142.9) 69 (20, 111) 81 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Hart County Rural No 1,125.2 (959.6, 1,311.1) 34 (2, 114) 34 stable stable trend -7.1 (-18.6, 0.2)
Harrison County Rural No 1,108.2 (950.1, 1,285.0) 38 (4, 115) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Harlan County Rural No 1,197.3 (1,059.1, 1,348.6) 17 (2, 88) 57 falling falling trend -2.2 (-7.3, -0.5)
Hardin County Urban No 1,066.6 (993.8, 1,143.3) 57 (20, 94) 163 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Hancock County Rural No 1,089.0 (868.7, 1,348.1) 46 (2, 120) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.5)
Greenup County Urban No 1,021.7 (920.9, 1,130.5) 80 (22, 115) 76 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Green County Rural No 1,062.1 (878.4, 1,272.7) 58 (4, 119) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Grayson County Rural No 1,182.6 (1,040.0, 1,339.3) 20 (2, 91) 52 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Graves County Rural No 1,044.8 (936.1, 1,162.6) 67 (15, 111) 68 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Grant County Urban No 1,087.2 (928.1, 1,265.5) 48 (6, 118) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Garrard County Rural No 1,028.9 (871.7, 1,206.3) 76 (8, 119) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Gallatin County Urban No 1,279.1 (933.4, 1,707.3) 11 (1, 119) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Fulton County Rural No 985.9 (755.7, 1,263.9) 92 (3, 120) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Franklin County Rural No 924.8 (834.8, 1,021.8) 108 (49, 120) 79 falling falling trend -4.2 (-9.0, -2.1)
Floyd County Rural No 1,163.3 (1,043.9, 1,292.7) 24 (4, 90) 73 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.7, -0.8)
Fleming County Rural No 1,088.8 (911.4, 1,290.7) 47 (3, 119) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Fayette County Urban No 848.7 (809.5, 889.3) 118 (101, 120) 362 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Estill County Rural No 1,095.5 (916.5, 1,299.2) 44 (3, 118) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Elliott County Rural No 1,017.8 (798.1, 1,279.1) 81 (2, 120) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Edmonson County Urban No 895.9 (735.2, 1,081.5) 111 (16, 120) 22 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Daviess County Urban No 938.2 (873.5, 1,006.4) 102 (61, 117) 159 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Cumberland County Rural No 1,296.8 (1,032.4, 1,608.3) 9 (1, 116) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.3)
Crittenden County Rural No 1,150.6 (935.4, 1,400.1) 26 (1, 118) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Clinton County Rural No 1,285.6 (1,055.9, 1,550.3) 10 (1, 100) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.9)
Clay County Rural No 1,386.4 (1,201.7, 1,591.8) 2 (1, 56) 42 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Clark County Urban No 929.9 (825.7, 1,043.5) 105 (42, 120) 59 falling falling trend -4.9 (-13.1, -0.9)
Christian County Urban No 989.9 (899.7, 1,086.6) 90 (30, 116) 89 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Casey County Rural No 1,095.6 (935.4, 1,275.3) 43 (4, 116) 34 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 1.0)
Carter County Urban No 1,116.8 (988.2, 1,257.5) 35 (6, 105) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Carroll County Rural No 1,146.1 (925.7, 1,403.4) 29 (1, 118) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Carlisle County Urban No 1,450.7 (1,132.1, 1,831.2) 1 (1, 100) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.7)
Campbell County Urban No 924.9 (855.2, 998.7) 107 (60, 118) 134 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.4, -1.5)
Calloway County Rural No 1,127.0 (1,010.4, 1,253.3) 33 (7, 96) 69 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
Caldwell County Rural No 884.6 (729.2, 1,063.4) 115 (31, 120) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Butler County Urban No 1,186.9 (990.0, 1,411.4) 19 (1, 111) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Bullitt County Urban No 884.0 (810.5, 962.4) 116 (71, 120) 111 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Breckinridge County Rural No 1,116.3 (967.8, 1,281.0) 36 (4, 111) 42 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Breathitt County Rural No 1,028.2 (844.6, 1,240.1) 77 (6, 120) 23 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Bracken County Urban No 1,044.7 (805.5, 1,331.8) 68 (2, 120) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Boyle County Rural No 974.2 (861.7, 1,097.3) 94 (21, 119) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Boyd County Urban No 997.4 (907.8, 1,093.3) 86 (33, 114) 92 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Bourbon County Urban No 1,058.5 (917.1, 1,215.5) 61 (9, 117) 41 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Boone County Urban No 804.6 (745.7, 866.8) 119 (104, 120) 144 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -2.0)
Bell County Rural No 1,149.3 (1,013.4, 1,298.5) 27 (3, 99) 53 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Bath County Rural No 1,051.0 (861.1, 1,270.4) 65 (4, 119) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Barren County Rural No 1,075.6 (972.6, 1,186.5) 52 (12, 105) 81 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Ballard County Urban No 1,095.9 (877.7, 1,351.9) 42 (1, 119) 18 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Anderson County Rural No 1,007.3 (863.5, 1,168.0) 84 (10, 119) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-9.7, -0.5)
Allen County Urban No 1,008.7 (863.4, 1,171.3) 83 (11, 119) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Adair County Rural No 1,054.1 (904.3, 1,221.5) 64 (7, 118) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/11/2024 5:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top