Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky N/A No 215.1 (212.4, 217.8) N/A 5,425 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.5)
United States N/A No 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) N/A 317,428 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.8, -1.8)
Allen County Urban No 213.4 (177.7, 254.5) 88 (14, 119) 27 falling falling trend -2.4 (-11.9, -1.2)
Ballard County Urban No 192.5 (143.1, 255.5) 108 (11, 119) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.2)
Boone County Urban No 167.1 (152.8, 182.4) 119 (99, 119) 111 falling falling trend -3.0 (-7.6, -2.2)
Bourbon County Urban No 220.7 (185.8, 260.9) 80 (10, 118) 30 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 8.2)
Boyd County Urban No 221.1 (197.5, 246.8) 77 (26, 111) 68 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Bracken County Urban No 193.2 (138.7, 262.3) 106 (9, 119) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Bullitt County Urban No 169.6 (152.6, 188.0) 118 (94, 119) 79 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -1.9)
Butler County Urban No 235.5 (188.4, 291.4) 55 (2, 118) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Campbell County Urban No 191.9 (174.9, 210.2) 109 (72, 118) 101 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Carlisle County Urban No 261.6 (184.9, 361.6) 22 (1, 119) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Carter County Urban No 250.8 (217.9, 287.6) 37 (4, 98) 44 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Christian County Urban No 231.7 (207.3, 257.9) 62 (17, 104) 69 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Clark County Urban No 195.2 (169.3, 224.3) 102 (47, 119) 43 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Daviess County Urban No 212.4 (195.4, 230.6) 90 (47, 108) 121 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Edmonson County Urban No 169.7 (133.4, 214.4) 117 (47, 119) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Fayette County Urban No 175.8 (166.0, 186.0) 116 (100, 119) 257 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -1.9)
Gallatin County Urban No 250.8 (174.8, 346.4) 35 (1, 119) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Grant County Urban No 225.1 (187.1, 268.4) 68 (7, 118) 28 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Greenup County Urban No 212.1 (186.4, 240.6) 91 (31, 116) 52 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Hardin County Urban No 226.2 (208.2, 245.4) 66 (30, 100) 125 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Henry County Urban No 274.7 (225.4, 331.8) 16 (1, 100) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.7)
Jefferson County Urban No 194.6 (188.5, 200.9) 104 (87, 111) 811 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -2.1)
Jessamine County Urban No 195.2 (173.0, 219.5) 103 (56, 119) 59 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Kenton County Urban No 204.5 (190.4, 219.5) 94 (59, 111) 173 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Larue County Urban No 197.7 (157.2, 246.0) 99 (16, 119) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Lawrence County Urban No 298.2 (246.4, 357.7) 2 (1, 79) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Livingston County Urban No 266.1 (214.1, 329.2) 20 (1, 109) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.9)
McCracken County Urban No 197.3 (178.3, 217.9) 101 (62, 117) 84 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
McLean County Urban No 220.8 (170.7, 282.4) 79 (3, 119) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Meade County Urban No 233.3 (200.0, 270.6) 58 (7, 113) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Nelson County Urban No 261.4 (231.3, 294.4) 24 (2, 85) 63 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.3, 10.0)
Oldham County Urban No 176.6 (156.0, 199.2) 115 (78, 119) 60 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Pendleton County Urban No 261.7 (213.4, 318.0) 21 (1, 109) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.2)
Scott County Urban No 181.8 (156.7, 209.5) 113 (62, 119) 44 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.1)
Shelby County Urban No 182.4 (159.4, 207.9) 112 (69, 119) 50 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Spencer County Urban No 204.3 (165.0, 250.1) 95 (17, 119) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.6)
Trigg County Urban No 217.9 (179.5, 263.4) 83 (9, 119) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Warren County Urban No 199.4 (183.3, 216.5) 97 (61, 114) 121 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Woodford County Urban No 179.8 (151.9, 211.8) 114 (58, 119) 32 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Adair County Rural No 238.5 (200.1, 282.5) 52 (4, 112) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Anderson County Rural No 210.6 (173.5, 253.2) 93 (19, 119) 26 falling falling trend -19.3 (-35.8, -0.6)
Barren County Rural No 250.8 (222.4, 281.9) 36 (6, 94) 62 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Bath County Rural No 220.2 (175.2, 273.9) 82 (5, 119) 18 falling falling trend -8.8 (-21.9, -0.5)
Bell County Rural No 243.6 (209.5, 282.1) 45 (6, 108) 39 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Boyle County Rural No 188.9 (161.5, 219.9) 111 (50, 119) 35 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Breathitt County Rural No 285.6 (231.6, 348.7) 6 (1, 96) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-9.6, 10.4)
Breckinridge County Rural No 247.3 (210.9, 288.8) 39 (3, 107) 35 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Caldwell County Rural No 192.8 (153.3, 240.5) 107 (23, 119) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Calloway County Rural No 244.7 (215.0, 277.6) 43 (6, 100) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.2)
Carroll County Rural No 278.2 (221.6, 345.3) 13 (1, 110) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Casey County Rural No 283.2 (235.7, 337.9) 8 (1, 91) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Clay County Rural No 282.6 (238.6, 332.6) 9 (1, 83) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Clinton County Rural No 289.3 (229.8, 360.7) 4 (1, 106) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Crittenden County Rural No 260.1 (203.4, 328.8) 27 (1, 115) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Cumberland County Rural No 254.0 (190.6, 335.2) 33 (1, 119) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.3)
Elliott County Rural No 215.7 (162.3, 282.8) 87 (2, 119) 11 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.7)
Estill County Rural No 260.5 (213.1, 315.9) 26 (1, 110) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Fleming County Rural No 240.6 (197.1, 291.6) 50 (2, 117) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.1)
Floyd County Rural No 223.4 (195.2, 254.7) 72 (17, 113) 50 falling falling trend -3.8 (-13.4, -1.1)
Franklin County Rural No 198.7 (175.6, 224.1) 98 (48, 118) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
Fulton County Rural No 259.1 (192.4, 342.9) 28 (1, 119) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Garrard County Rural No 212.8 (174.3, 257.9) 89 (13, 119) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.3)
Graves County Rural No 229.6 (201.9, 260.2) 64 (15, 109) 53 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Grayson County Rural No 250.9 (215.4, 290.7) 34 (3, 104) 40 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Green County Rural No 228.9 (183.8, 283.1) 65 (3, 119) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Hancock County Rural No 216.6 (164.2, 281.2) 84 (3, 119) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.1)
Harlan County Rural No 281.1 (244.3, 322.2) 10 (1, 75) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Harrison County Rural No 244.2 (204.2, 290.3) 44 (2, 113) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.5)
Hart County Rural No 247.2 (204.0, 296.9) 40 (2, 113) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Henderson County Rural No 224.6 (198.8, 253.0) 69 (21, 109) 59 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Hickman County Rural No 232.0 (168.2, 319.1) 60 (1, 119) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Hopkins County Rural No 224.1 (199.0, 251.7) 70 (22, 109) 62 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Jackson County Rural No 223.7 (178.0, 278.2) 71 (4, 119) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.2)
Johnson County Rural No 221.0 (185.7, 261.4) 78 (10, 118) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Knott County Rural No 191.8 (151.9, 239.9) 110 (27, 119) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Knox County Rural No 284.2 (249.2, 322.9) 7 (1, 64) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.7, -0.4)
Laurel County Rural No 222.6 (200.4, 246.5) 73 (27, 107) 79 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.3)
Lee County Rural No 270.9 (205.4, 351.5) 18 (1, 116) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Leslie County Rural No 259.0 (206.1, 322.4) 29 (1, 115) 18 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Letcher County Rural No 276.5 (237.2, 321.0) 14 (1, 83) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Lewis County Rural No 273.3 (225.5, 329.2) 17 (1, 104) 24 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 242.4 (207.4, 281.9) 47 (4, 107) 36 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Logan County Rural No 240.3 (207.9, 276.6) 51 (7, 106) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Lyon County Rural No 193.4 (148.5, 250.3) 105 (15, 119) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.0)
Madison County Rural No 211.6 (192.0, 232.5) 92 (42, 110) 94 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Magoffin County Rural No 255.3 (203.8, 316.4) 32 (1, 115) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.8)
Marion County Rural No 203.0 (164.9, 247.3) 96 (14, 119) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Marshall County Rural No 246.1 (216.5, 279.0) 42 (7, 96) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Martin County Rural No 215.9 (167.2, 274.6) 86 (3, 119) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Mason County Rural No 260.8 (214.8, 313.9) 25 (1, 109) 25 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
McCreary County Rural No 261.5 (216.7, 312.9) 23 (1, 104) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Menifee County Rural No 290.6 (218.9, 380.4) 3 (1, 113) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 1.1)
Mercer County Rural No 250.4 (211.9, 294.1) 38 (2, 104) 35 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Metcalfe County Rural No 242.1 (191.2, 303.4) 48 (1, 118) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-10.3, -0.4)
Monroe County Rural No 257.7 (206.1, 319.1) 31 (1, 115) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Montgomery County Rural No 275.7 (238.2, 317.4) 15 (1, 82) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Morgan County Rural No 222.4 (178.0, 274.9) 74 (5, 119) 19 stable stable trend -7.3 (-20.5, 0.0)
Muhlenberg County Rural No 231.6 (201.3, 265.3) 63 (11, 109) 45 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Nicholas County Rural No 197.3 (143.5, 265.9) 100 (6, 119) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Ohio County Rural No 242.5 (207.3, 282.3) 46 (4, 108) 36 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Owen County Rural No 220.4 (172.3, 278.6) 81 (3, 119) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Owsley County Rural No 325.0 (232.2, 445.6) 1 (1, 114) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Perry County Rural No 257.9 (224.3, 295.4) 30 (2, 92) 46 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Pike County Rural No 241.2 (218.4, 265.8) 49 (10, 91) 91 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Powell County Rural No 280.5 (224.0, 347.0) 11 (1, 109) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Pulaski County Rural No 235.1 (213.6, 258.2) 56 (18, 96) 96 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Rockcastle County Rural No 233.7 (192.2, 282.1) 57 (4, 115) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Rowan County Rural No 225.4 (187.6, 268.6) 67 (8, 117) 26 falling falling trend -3.0 (-11.8, -0.7)
Russell County Rural No 247.0 (207.3, 292.6) 41 (2, 109) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Simpson County Rural No 221.2 (180.9, 267.9) 76 (5, 119) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Taylor County Rural No 270.6 (233.1, 312.7) 19 (1, 86) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.8)
Todd County Rural No 221.8 (174.8, 278.2) 75 (4, 119) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Trimble County Rural No 236.8 (180.8, 305.9) 53 (1, 119) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.5)
Union County Rural No 232.1 (184.2, 288.9) 59 (2, 119) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Washington County Rural No 235.8 (184.9, 296.7) 54 (1, 119) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Wayne County Rural No 216.1 (183.2, 254.0) 85 (17, 118) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Webster County Rural No 231.7 (184.1, 288.2) 61 (2, 119) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Whitley County Rural No 286.4 (252.8, 323.2) 5 (1, 63) 56 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.4)
Wolfe County Rural No 278.5 (206.1, 369.1) 12 (1, 116) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.4)
Robertson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/04/2024 5:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top