Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

White (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky *** 188.1 (186.4, 189.8) N/A 9,525 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
United States *** 153.4 (153.2, 153.6) N/A 505,697 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Perry County *** 276.3 (250.8, 303.8) 1 (1, 23) 92 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Wolfe County *** 274.9 (228.8, 328.2) 2 (1, 66) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Whitley County *** 263.5 (241.8, 286.7) 3 (1, 28) 112 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Clay County *** 262.1 (232.7, 294.4) 4 (1, 42) 61 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Leslie County *** 246.0 (209.4, 287.7) 5 (1, 87) 34 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Owsley County *** 245.7 (192.5, 310.7) 6 (1, 117) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Harlan County *** 245.1 (221.6, 270.5) 7 (1, 55) 85 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
Carroll County *** 244.9 (207.2, 287.8) 8 (1, 89) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Nicholas County *** 243.3 (199.9, 294.1) 9 (1, 104) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Hart County *** 242.9 (214.2, 274.6) 10 (1, 64) 54 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Powell County *** 242.5 (206.7, 283.0) 11 (1, 86) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Lawrence County *** 241.5 (211.1, 275.3) 12 (1, 76) 48 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Johnson County *** 241.5 (216.5, 268.8) 13 (1, 67) 72 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Monroe County *** 239.2 (204.0, 279.3) 14 (1, 89) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Breathitt County *** 239.0 (205.7, 276.4) 15 (1, 87) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Knox County *** 237.4 (216.2, 260.4) 16 (2, 57) 95 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Martin County *** 237.4 (201.4, 278.4) 17 (1, 90) 33 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Floyd County *** 236.8 (217.1, 258.0) 18 (2, 56) 113 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Lewis County *** 233.6 (202.5, 268.4) 19 (1, 88) 43 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Bell County *** 232.3 (210.2, 256.3) 20 (2, 72) 84 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
McCreary County *** 228.5 (199.1, 261.1) 21 (2, 87) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Letcher County *** 227.5 (203.5, 253.8) 22 (2, 81) 70 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Lee County *** 225.3 (182.8, 275.7) 23 (1, 114) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Morgan County *** 225.2 (192.6, 262.1) 24 (1, 101) 36 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.3)
Estill County *** 225.0 (194.8, 259.0) 25 (2, 99) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Fleming County *** 221.9 (192.0, 255.5) 26 (2, 101) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Russell County *** 220.9 (194.9, 249.7) 27 (3, 95) 56 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Menifee County *** 219.8 (179.4, 268.3) 28 (1, 116) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Pike County *** 218.5 (203.9, 233.9) 29 (10, 73) 176 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
Bath County *** 217.4 (185.6, 253.6) 30 (2, 108) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Cumberland County *** 216.5 (177.5, 263.0) 31 (1, 116) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Ohio County *** 215.3 (192.4, 240.4) 32 (6, 95) 67 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Montgomery County *** 214.8 (192.4, 239.3) 33 (5, 98) 69 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Todd County *** 214.4 (181.0, 252.4) 34 (2, 114) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Butler County *** 213.9 (183.4, 248.6) 35 (4, 107) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Knott County *** 213.5 (185.2, 245.2) 36 (3, 103) 44 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Magoffin County *** 213.3 (181.4, 249.5) 37 (3, 112) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Grayson County *** 213.0 (191.1, 236.9) 38 (8, 97) 73 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.6, 1.6)
Lincoln County *** 212.9 (190.5, 237.5) 39 (7, 98) 68 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Union County *** 212.6 (181.5, 248.0) 40 (3, 112) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Henry County *** 210.8 (182.3, 242.8) 41 (4, 110) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Logan County *** 210.4 (188.7, 234.1) 42 (8, 100) 72 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Gallatin County *** 210.0 (169.2, 257.9) 43 (2, 120) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Taylor County *** 209.7 (187.4, 234.2) 44 (9, 106) 67 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Clinton County *** 209.6 (176.8, 247.3) 45 (3, 114) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Metcalfe County *** 209.5 (176.2, 247.9) 46 (3, 115) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Webster County *** 209.2 (178.2, 244.5) 47 (3, 113) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Anderson County *** 209.0 (184.3, 236.2) 48 (7, 103) 54 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
McLean County *** 208.1 (173.8, 247.9) 49 (3, 117) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Grant County *** 207.6 (182.7, 234.9) 50 (7, 107) 53 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Carter County *** 207.3 (186.8, 229.7) 51 (13, 99) 77 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Washington County *** 205.7 (174.7, 241.1) 52 (4, 116) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Hopkins County *** 205.0 (188.4, 222.8) 53 (16, 92) 118 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Simpson County *** 205.0 (177.7, 235.5) 54 (7, 112) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.1)
Carlisle County *** 204.9 (160.4, 260.0) 55 (1, 120) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Trimble County *** 203.1 (165.5, 247.2) 56 (2, 120) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Pulaski County *** 203.0 (189.4, 217.4) 57 (23, 89) 173 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Hancock County *** 201.4 (164.8, 244.4) 58 (2, 119) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Meade County *** 201.1 (178.5, 225.9) 59 (13, 111) 61 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Laurel County *** 201.0 (186.4, 216.4) 60 (25, 95) 148 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Boyd County *** 200.3 (185.1, 216.6) 61 (24, 97) 134 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Bourbon County *** 200.3 (176.0, 227.3) 62 (10, 112) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Mason County *** 198.6 (172.1, 228.4) 63 (10, 116) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Robertson County *** 198.0 (135.8, 284.8) 64 (1, 120) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Jackson County *** 197.6 (168.5, 230.7) 65 (7, 118) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Greenup County *** 197.2 (180.3, 215.5) 66 (24, 104) 104 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Pendleton County *** 196.4 (167.5, 229.1) 67 (8, 118) 35 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Livingston County *** 196.4 (164.1, 234.1) 68 (6, 119) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Harrison County *** 195.8 (171.4, 223.1) 69 (15, 114) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Clark County *** 195.4 (177.2, 215.0) 70 (24, 110) 88 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.7, -1.0)
Hardin County *** 195.2 (183.2, 207.8) 71 (34, 97) 204 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Crittenden County *** 194.9 (161.8, 233.8) 72 (6, 120) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Larue County *** 193.9 (166.1, 225.5) 73 (12, 117) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Breckinridge County *** 193.2 (170.3, 218.6) 74 (18, 115) 54 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Rowan County *** 192.3 (168.5, 218.7) 75 (18, 116) 48 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Marshall County *** 191.6 (173.9, 210.8) 76 (27, 112) 92 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Barren County *** 191.5 (175.3, 209.0) 77 (30, 109) 106 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Mercer County *** 191.4 (169.2, 216.1) 78 (17, 117) 56 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Henderson County *** 191.2 (175.0, 208.7) 79 (29, 110) 107 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Muhlenberg County *** 189.8 (171.3, 210.0) 80 (27, 113) 80 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Wayne County *** 189.5 (167.2, 214.2) 81 (20, 117) 56 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Bracken County *** 189.2 (153.4, 231.5) 82 (6, 120) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Green County *** 189.1 (160.2, 222.7) 83 (14, 120) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.1)
Casey County *** 188.6 (163.8, 216.7) 84 (14, 119) 43 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.2, -2.1)
Marion County *** 188.1 (162.6, 216.6) 85 (19, 119) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Fulton County *** 186.9 (144.4, 240.5) 86 (4, 120) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Garrard County *** 186.7 (162.0, 214.5) 87 (21, 118) 43 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Rockcastle County *** 186.7 (161.3, 215.4) 88 (19, 120) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Nelson County *** 184.4 (167.6, 202.5) 89 (38, 115) 94 stable stable trend 4.7 (-2.7, 12.8)
Madison County *** 183.8 (171.3, 197.1) 90 (49, 111) 164 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Franklin County *** 183.4 (168.2, 199.8) 91 (44, 114) 111 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Elliott County *** 182.8 (147.4, 225.2) 92 (10, 120) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Boyle County *** 180.3 (161.3, 201.2) 93 (34, 118) 69 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Kenton County *** 180.0 (170.9, 189.3) 94 (64, 110) 314 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Allen County *** 178.8 (156.3, 204.0) 95 (28, 120) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Christian County *** 178.3 (162.5, 195.3) 96 (48, 117) 96 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Graves County *** 175.1 (158.5, 193.2) 97 (53, 118) 85 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Campbell County *** 174.2 (163.1, 186.0) 98 (69, 116) 189 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Daviess County *** 173.2 (162.7, 184.2) 99 (70, 115) 212 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Edmonson County *** 172.4 (145.4, 203.7) 100 (29, 120) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Trigg County *** 172.4 (147.5, 201.1) 101 (28, 120) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Jessamine County *** 172.1 (157.0, 188.2) 102 (64, 120) 100 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Caldwell County *** 172.0 (145.8, 202.1) 103 (28, 120) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Shelby County *** 171.9 (155.8, 189.4) 104 (58, 119) 87 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Warren County *** 170.0 (159.4, 181.1) 105 (75, 118) 199 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Jefferson County *** 168.0 (163.9, 172.3) 106 (92, 114) 1,297 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
McCracken County *** 167.9 (155.7, 181.0) 107 (75, 119) 147 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Lyon County *** 167.4 (137.4, 204.0) 108 (28, 120) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Scott County *** 166.6 (150.0, 184.4) 109 (64, 120) 80 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Bullitt County *** 165.7 (153.8, 178.4) 110 (80, 119) 152 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Calloway County *** 165.3 (148.8, 183.2) 111 (67, 120) 77 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Woodford County *** 161.8 (142.4, 183.4) 112 (65, 120) 53 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.8, -1.9)
Ballard County *** 161.3 (129.8, 199.3) 113 (26, 120) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Owen County *** 160.5 (131.5, 194.4) 114 (38, 120) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Hickman County *** 157.8 (119.4, 208.2) 115 (24, 120) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Adair County *** 155.4 (134.0, 179.6) 116 (70, 120) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Fayette County *** 154.3 (147.7, 161.1) 117 (105, 120) 428 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Spencer County *** 153.2 (128.7, 181.1) 118 (59, 120) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Boone County *** 153.2 (143.6, 163.3) 119 (102, 120) 199 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Oldham County *** 150.1 (136.3, 164.9) 120 (93, 120) 95 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/17/2021 8:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top