Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites, 2014-2018

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky *** 193.8 (192.0, 195.6) N/A 9,529 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
United States 6 *** 160.2 (160.0, 160.4) N/A 465,913 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Whitley County *** 275.4 (253.1, 299.3) 1 (1, 19) 116 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Breathitt County *** 274.5 (238.5, 314.7) 2 (1, 48) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Owsley County *** 266.5 (210.9, 334.0) 3 (1, 107) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Wolfe County *** 263.6 (218.8, 315.7) 4 (1, 88) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Perry County *** 260.1 (235.4, 286.8) 5 (1, 40) 86 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.8)
Harlan County *** 257.1 (233.0, 283.1) 6 (1, 46) 89 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Clay County *** 256.4 (227.1, 288.6) 7 (1, 56) 59 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Carroll County *** 253.5 (214.4, 298.2) 8 (1, 83) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Powell County *** 251.4 (214.7, 292.7) 9 (1, 81) 36 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Nicholas County *** 249.3 (205.4, 300.7) 10 (1, 99) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Leslie County *** 247.4 (210.4, 289.5) 11 (1, 89) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Lawrence County *** 244.6 (213.9, 278.7) 12 (1, 77) 49 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Hart County *** 243.2 (214.3, 275.0) 13 (1, 78) 54 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Johnson County *** 242.5 (217.3, 270.1) 14 (1, 68) 71 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Estill County *** 238.3 (207.2, 273.1) 15 (1, 94) 45 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Morgan County *** 238.2 (204.1, 276.6) 16 (1, 96) 37 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
McLean County *** 237.9 (200.6, 280.8) 17 (1, 103) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Knox County *** 234.4 (213.2, 257.3) 18 (4, 70) 93 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Gallatin County *** 234.2 (190.0, 286.0) 19 (1, 114) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Martin County *** 234.1 (198.4, 274.8) 20 (1, 106) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Lee County *** 232.9 (189.3, 284.6) 21 (1, 113) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Monroe County *** 232.6 (198.0, 272.2) 22 (1, 104) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Floyd County *** 231.1 (211.4, 252.2) 23 (4, 69) 108 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Fleming County *** 230.7 (199.6, 265.5) 24 (2, 97) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Menifee County *** 229.4 (186.8, 280.2) 25 (1, 116) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Grant County *** 228.4 (201.8, 257.6) 26 (3, 91) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Union County *** 226.6 (194.3, 263.1) 27 (1, 105) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Pike County *** 226.2 (211.2, 242.1) 28 (10, 66) 179 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.1)
Letcher County *** 224.5 (200.7, 250.7) 29 (4, 89) 69 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Russell County *** 224.4 (198.0, 253.6) 30 (3, 93) 56 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Lincoln County *** 223.9 (200.6, 249.4) 31 (5, 89) 70 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Robertson County *** 223.1 (157.2, 313.2) 32 (1, 120) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Ohio County *** 222.8 (199.4, 248.5) 33 (5, 94) 68 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Grayson County *** 222.7 (200.0, 247.5) 34 (5, 92) 74 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.8)
Lewis County *** 221.1 (190.8, 255.3) 35 (3, 109) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Bell County *** 220.9 (199.5, 244.3) 36 (8, 91) 80 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Bath County *** 219.7 (187.2, 256.6) 37 (2, 112) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Anderson County *** 219.5 (193.8, 247.7) 38 (5, 97) 55 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Todd County *** 218.2 (184.3, 257.0) 39 (1, 114) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Simpson County *** 217.7 (189.3, 249.6) 40 (4, 107) 43 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
McCreary County *** 217.6 (188.6, 249.9) 41 (4, 110) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Webster County *** 217.0 (185.1, 253.2) 42 (2, 115) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Knott County *** 216.7 (188.1, 248.7) 43 (3, 107) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Cumberland County *** 215.0 (176.1, 261.5) 44 (1, 119) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Magoffin County *** 214.8 (182.6, 251.4) 45 (3, 112) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Logan County *** 214.8 (192.7, 238.9) 46 (9, 98) 72 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Taylor County *** 214.5 (191.6, 239.6) 47 (8, 100) 67 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.6)
Henry County *** 212.2 (183.1, 245.0) 48 (5, 112) 40 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Bracken County *** 212.1 (174.1, 256.7) 49 (2, 119) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Clark County *** 211.0 (191.7, 231.9) 50 (11, 99) 91 stable stable trend -5.8 (-13.3, 2.4)
Rowan County *** 210.5 (185.1, 238.6) 51 (8, 109) 51 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Hopkins County *** 210.4 (193.5, 228.4) 52 (18, 93) 120 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Pulaski County *** 210.1 (196.2, 224.8) 53 (21, 86) 177 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
Montgomery County *** 210.1 (187.5, 234.7) 54 (9, 106) 66 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Harrison County *** 209.8 (183.8, 238.6) 55 (7, 112) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.3)
Butler County *** 208.4 (177.9, 243.0) 56 (6, 117) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Clinton County *** 207.4 (174.4, 245.5) 57 (4, 118) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Washington County *** 207.0 (175.7, 243.0) 58 (6, 119) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Carlisle County *** 206.9 (162.4, 261.8) 59 (1, 120) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Laurel County *** 206.3 (191.3, 222.2) 60 (23, 93) 147 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Trimble County *** 205.6 (167.4, 250.4) 61 (3, 120) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Marion County *** 205.6 (178.9, 235.4) 62 (10, 114) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Jackson County *** 205.3 (175.1, 239.7) 63 (6, 118) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Greenup County *** 204.9 (187.6, 223.7) 64 (19, 103) 106 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Meade County *** 203.7 (180.7, 229.0) 65 (15, 113) 60 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Wayne County *** 202.7 (179.5, 228.6) 66 (17, 113) 58 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Livingston County *** 201.4 (167.8, 240.7) 67 (7, 119) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Carter County *** 201.3 (180.8, 223.8) 68 (20, 111) 73 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Rockcastle County *** 201.2 (174.5, 231.2) 69 (13, 117) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Barren County *** 200.9 (184.1, 218.9) 70 (21, 104) 109 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Garrard County *** 199.7 (173.8, 228.7) 71 (15, 118) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Mason County *** 199.2 (172.5, 229.2) 72 (14, 118) 42 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Hardin County *** 198.8 (186.4, 211.9) 73 (37, 99) 197 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Henderson County *** 197.6 (180.9, 215.4) 74 (29, 108) 109 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Breckinridge County *** 196.9 (173.4, 223.0) 75 (17, 117) 54 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Muhlenberg County *** 196.7 (177.7, 217.4) 76 (26, 111) 81 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Pendleton County *** 194.9 (165.7, 228.0) 77 (12, 120) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Boyd County *** 194.4 (179.3, 210.6) 78 (35, 108) 128 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Larue County *** 194.1 (165.9, 226.1) 79 (13, 120) 35 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Metcalfe County *** 193.3 (160.7, 231.2) 80 (9, 120) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Mercer County *** 192.2 (169.5, 217.4) 81 (22, 118) 54 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Marshall County *** 192.0 (174.3, 211.2) 82 (34, 115) 91 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Casey County *** 191.7 (166.1, 220.5) 83 (19, 120) 42 falling falling trend -6.0 (-8.7, -3.2)
Elliott County *** 190.7 (154.2, 234.4) 84 (9, 120) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Hancock County *** 189.8 (153.6, 232.5) 85 (8, 120) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Fulton County *** 188.9 (146.4, 242.4) 86 (4, 120) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Crittenden County *** 188.8 (156.3, 227.0) 87 (13, 120) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Allen County *** 188.3 (164.7, 214.4) 88 (22, 120) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Christian County *** 185.5 (169.2, 202.9) 89 (44, 117) 98 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Bourbon County *** 185.4 (161.3, 212.6) 90 (28, 120) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Madison County *** 185.3 (172.5, 198.9) 91 (55, 113) 160 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Shelby County *** 184.8 (167.6, 203.5) 92 (46, 117) 89 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Boyle County *** 184.3 (164.7, 205.8) 93 (40, 119) 68 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Kenton County *** 183.1 (173.9, 192.7) 94 (64, 111) 311 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Campbell County *** 182.9 (171.3, 195.1) 95 (61, 114) 194 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Daviess County *** 182.8 (171.9, 194.2) 96 (61, 115) 220 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Graves County *** 180.0 (162.7, 198.7) 97 (52, 119) 84 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Jessamine County *** 179.8 (164.0, 196.8) 98 (56, 118) 99 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Nelson County *** 178.7 (161.9, 196.8) 99 (53, 119) 87 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Scott County *** 178.4 (160.8, 197.3) 100 (53, 119) 81 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Franklin County *** 177.3 (162.1, 193.8) 101 (63, 119) 105 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Caldwell County *** 176.9 (149.6, 208.3) 102 (28, 120) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Jefferson County *** 176.5 (172.1, 180.9) 103 (87, 111) 1,315 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Trigg County *** 175.7 (149.5, 205.7) 104 (30, 120) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Warren County *** 174.8 (163.8, 186.3) 105 (74, 118) 196 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Bullitt County *** 174.4 (161.9, 187.6) 106 (69, 119) 155 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Green County *** 174.2 (145.7, 207.4) 107 (30, 120) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Ballard County *** 172.9 (138.9, 213.7) 108 (23, 120) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Edmonson County *** 172.3 (145.1, 204.0) 109 (30, 120) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
McCracken County *** 172.2 (159.7, 185.5) 110 (73, 119) 148 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Lyon County *** 170.3 (138.8, 208.8) 111 (28, 120) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Spencer County *** 166.9 (140.4, 197.0) 112 (43, 120) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Calloway County *** 166.6 (150.2, 184.6) 113 (75, 120) 77 stable stable trend -5.3 (-10.5, 0.1)
Adair County *** 166.0 (143.3, 191.4) 114 (54, 120) 40 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Hickman County *** 164.2 (125.1, 215.4) 115 (18, 120) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Woodford County *** 162.9 (142.9, 185.2) 116 (67, 120) 51 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.1, -2.0)
Boone County *** 162.8 (152.6, 173.6) 117 (93, 120) 199 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Fayette County *** 161.1 (154.2, 168.3) 118 (103, 120) 425 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Oldham County *** 157.7 (143.2, 173.3) 119 (91, 120) 96 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Owen County *** 155.5 (127.0, 189.2) 120 (55, 120) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2021 6:53 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2018) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top