Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Kentucky N/A No 181.7 (180.1, 183.4) N/A 9,404 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -1.0)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Nelson County Urban No 196.2 (179.3, 214.3) 63 (19, 101) 105 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 7.4)
Carlisle County Urban No 251.5 (200.3, 313.8) 3 (1, 100) 18 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 11.5)
Cumberland County Rural No 234.3 (192.5, 284.5) 13 (1, 106) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Clay County Rural No 249.5 (221.5, 280.3) 5 (1, 50) 61 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Grayson County Rural No 215.0 (193.0, 239.0) 29 (5, 87) 74 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.6)
Morgan County Rural No 207.9 (177.3, 242.7) 42 (2, 114) 35 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Owsley County Rural No 273.4 (213.4, 346.8) 1 (1, 87) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.2)
Calloway County Rural No 202.8 (184.0, 223.2) 50 (12, 99) 90 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Green County Rural No 203.7 (173.6, 238.4) 47 (4, 114) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Leslie County Rural No 245.2 (209.6, 285.7) 8 (1, 73) 36 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.0)
Simpson County Rural No 182.3 (157.1, 210.6) 83 (21, 118) 39 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Clinton County Rural No 252.6 (214.7, 296.1) 2 (1, 69) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Livingston County Urban No 229.0 (193.9, 269.8) 16 (1, 96) 32 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Rowan County Rural No 186.7 (163.4, 212.5) 77 (18, 116) 48 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Taylor County Rural No 206.3 (184.4, 230.4) 44 (8, 100) 68 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Estill County Rural No 217.2 (187.8, 250.4) 25 (2, 101) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Fleming County Rural No 215.7 (186.5, 248.6) 26 (2, 103) 42 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Henry County Urban No 213.6 (185.0, 245.9) 31 (2, 110) 42 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Knox County Rural No 246.8 (224.8, 270.6) 7 (1, 42) 96 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.6, 0.4)
Lawrence County Urban No 240.1 (210.2, 273.4) 11 (1, 71) 50 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Metcalfe County Rural No 210.4 (177.8, 247.9) 40 (1, 112) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Monroe County Rural No 220.9 (187.6, 259.1) 23 (1, 105) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Perry County Rural No 249.5 (226.1, 274.9) 4 (1, 41) 89 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.6)
Russell County Rural No 213.2 (187.7, 241.6) 33 (3, 99) 55 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Todd County Rural No 215.6 (181.6, 254.4) 27 (1, 113) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Casey County Rural No 200.3 (174.5, 229.4) 55 (7, 111) 46 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Crittenden County Rural No 212.0 (176.7, 253.1) 34 (1, 115) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Knott County Rural No 200.0 (171.8, 232.1) 56 (5, 115) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Lee County Rural No 240.4 (195.9, 292.8) 10 (1, 102) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Lewis County Rural No 224.9 (194.0, 259.7) 19 (1, 95) 41 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Rockcastle County Rural No 211.0 (183.9, 241.3) 36 (4, 105) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Whitley County Rural No 223.9 (203.9, 245.3) 21 (3, 72) 96 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Fulton County Rural No 224.2 (175.5, 284.3) 20 (1, 117) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Hickman County Rural No 168.1 (129.9, 218.4) 104 (11, 120) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Marshall County Rural No 195.6 (177.9, 214.8) 64 (17, 103) 95 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Trimble County Rural No 196.5 (159.7, 239.9) 62 (2, 119) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.1)
Washington County Rural No 176.9 (148.1, 210.4) 94 (19, 119) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Wolfe County Rural No 240.9 (195.4, 294.6) 9 (1, 106) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Woodford County Urban No 165.1 (146.0, 186.3) 111 (52, 119) 58 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 3.7)
Anderson County Rural No 181.1 (159.1, 205.5) 85 (23, 117) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Barren County Rural No 194.4 (178.0, 212.0) 66 (24, 104) 108 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Carroll County Rural No 215.2 (180.3, 255.4) 28 (1, 113) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Graves County Rural No 187.9 (170.4, 206.9) 75 (26, 111) 89 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Henderson County Rural No 188.9 (172.6, 206.4) 71 (27, 109) 105 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Martin County Rural No 219.4 (184.8, 259.2) 24 (1, 108) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Pulaski County Rural No 200.5 (187.2, 214.6) 54 (21, 92) 178 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Webster County Rural No 208.1 (176.2, 244.6) 41 (2, 111) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Adair County Rural No 197.3 (172.6, 225.0) 60 (8, 113) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.3)
Allen County Urban No 180.0 (157.6, 204.9) 87 (23, 117) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.4)
Christian County Urban No 186.6 (170.5, 203.9) 78 (33, 111) 102 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Clark County Urban No 179.3 (162.0, 198.1) 92 (37, 116) 82 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Floyd County Rural No 227.8 (208.5, 248.5) 17 (2, 64) 111 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Garrard County Rural No 182.3 (157.7, 210.0) 84 (21, 118) 42 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Harrison County Rural No 194.5 (170.6, 221.3) 65 (12, 113) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Johnson County Rural No 210.8 (187.4, 236.7) 37 (4, 99) 63 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Laurel County Rural No 188.8 (174.9, 203.5) 72 (34, 105) 144 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Lincoln County Rural No 210.6 (188.3, 235.0) 39 (7, 93) 68 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.4, -0.1)
Logan County Rural No 199.5 (178.4, 222.6) 58 (12, 104) 68 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Bell County Rural No 226.5 (203.7, 251.3) 18 (1, 75) 77 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Breathitt County Rural No 214.8 (184.0, 249.6) 30 (2, 107) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Butler County Urban No 231.9 (199.2, 269.0) 14 (1, 91) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Gallatin County Urban No 223.8 (173.2, 284.0) 22 (1, 118) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Hardin County Urban No 193.8 (182.0, 206.2) 67 (29, 95) 208 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Magoffin County Rural No 211.8 (179.1, 249.1) 35 (2, 113) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Mason County Rural No 203.6 (176.5, 234.0) 48 (5, 109) 43 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Ohio County Rural No 210.7 (188.3, 235.4) 38 (5, 95) 66 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Powell County Rural No 248.9 (213.4, 288.8) 6 (1, 69) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Union County Rural No 192.9 (163.7, 226.5) 68 (7, 117) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Hancock County Rural No 190.7 (156.4, 231.0) 70 (4, 119) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Jackson County Rural No 179.7 (151.5, 212.0) 89 (13, 119) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Letcher County Rural No 201.9 (179.1, 227.1) 51 (9, 105) 62 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
McCreary County Rural No 230.8 (201.3, 263.8) 15 (1, 86) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 205.9 (184.2, 229.6) 45 (9, 100) 68 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Nicholas County Rural No 186.3 (149.0, 230.9) 79 (5, 120) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Pendleton County Urban No 201.6 (172.1, 234.9) 52 (3, 113) 36 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Bracken County Urban No 179.6 (144.4, 221.4) 90 (7, 119) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Hopkins County Rural No 179.7 (164.2, 196.5) 88 (38, 114) 104 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Larue County Urban No 186.7 (158.9, 218.4) 76 (12, 118) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Lyon County Rural No 175.2 (144.0, 213.0) 97 (13, 120) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.2)
McCracken County Urban No 165.5 (153.4, 178.3) 109 (75, 117) 148 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
McLean County Urban No 187.9 (155.6, 225.9) 74 (8, 119) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Menifee County Rural No 213.3 (171.9, 263.3) 32 (1, 118) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.9)
Mercer County Rural No 201.2 (178.7, 226.0) 53 (11, 111) 62 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Muhlenberg County Rural No 183.8 (165.7, 203.7) 81 (30, 114) 78 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Carter County Urban No 206.3 (186.1, 228.5) 43 (9, 96) 79 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Grant County Urban No 192.0 (168.4, 218.0) 69 (13, 114) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Madison County Rural No 173.9 (162.0, 186.5) 98 (60, 115) 164 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Marion County Rural No 167.0 (143.7, 193.3) 105 (37, 120) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Bourbon County Urban No 197.5 (174.0, 223.7) 59 (8, 112) 53 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Breckinridge County Rural No 199.8 (176.7, 225.5) 57 (11, 108) 57 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Daviess County Urban No 171.5 (161.1, 182.5) 101 (69, 114) 213 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Greenup County Urban No 178.6 (162.7, 195.8) 93 (39, 115) 97 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Meade County Urban No 188.4 (167.4, 211.5) 73 (19, 115) 63 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Shelby County Urban No 165.5 (149.9, 182.4) 108 (62, 119) 87 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.2)
Boyle County Rural No 176.8 (158.2, 197.3) 95 (36, 117) 69 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Owen County Rural No 169.9 (141.7, 202.7) 102 (24, 120) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Trigg County Urban No 180.0 (154.3, 209.6) 86 (19, 119) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Warren County Urban No 173.7 (163.2, 184.7) 99 (64, 114) 211 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Ballard County Urban No 172.9 (140.1, 212.5) 100 (14, 120) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Edmonson County Urban No 165.8 (140.1, 195.8) 107 (34, 120) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Spencer County Urban No 168.6 (143.5, 197.1) 103 (35, 120) 36 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.3)
Franklin County Rural No 163.8 (149.6, 179.2) 113 (72, 119) 102 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Harlan County Rural No 239.7 (216.8, 264.6) 12 (1, 52) 86 stable stable trend -1.4 (-10.0, 0.1)
Jessamine County Urban No 162.0 (147.8, 177.3) 114 (68, 119) 100 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Scott County Urban No 165.4 (149.3, 182.8) 110 (62, 119) 83 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.8)
Campbell County Urban No 164.6 (153.9, 175.8) 112 (79, 117) 188 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Oldham County Urban No 144.2 (131.3, 158.1) 118 (102, 120) 98 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Boyd County Urban No 185.4 (170.8, 201.0) 80 (34, 110) 126 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.5, -1.2)
Bullitt County Urban No 154.5 (143.4, 166.2) 116 (91, 119) 153 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.1)
Elliott County Rural No 179.6 (145.3, 220.9) 91 (11, 120) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.3)
Fayette County Urban No 145.4 (139.1, 151.9) 117 (111, 120) 413 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Jefferson County Urban No 158.7 (154.7, 162.9) 115 (101, 116) 1,234 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Kenton County Urban No 166.8 (158.3, 175.7) 106 (80, 115) 304 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.6)
Pike County Rural No 203.8 (189.7, 218.7) 46 (17, 89) 166 falling falling trend -2.3 (-6.7, -0.8)
Bath County Rural No 196.7 (166.7, 230.9) 61 (6, 117) 32 falling falling trend -2.4 (-8.7, -0.6)
Boone County Urban No 141.3 (132.4, 150.5) 119 (111, 120) 200 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.6, -1.8)
Caldwell County Rural No 175.8 (149.1, 206.6) 96 (19, 119) 32 falling falling trend -3.8 (-13.5, -1.0)
Hart County Rural No 203.4 (177.2, 232.7) 49 (7, 110) 46 falling falling trend -10.5 (-20.5, -0.1)
Wayne County Rural No 182.8 (160.6, 207.7) 82 (21, 118) 53 falling falling trend -11.0 (-21.4, -0.3)
Robertson County Rural Yes 96.7 (58.2, 159.7) 120 (80, 120) 4 falling falling trend -14.1 (-38.5, -1.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 6:43 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top