Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Kentucky N/A Yes 16.1 (15.6, 16.6) N/A 897 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 1.2)
United States N/A Yes 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Adair County Rural Yes 15.6 (9.6, 24.5) 66 (6, 85) 4
*
*
Allen County Urban Yes 10.6 (6.0, 17.8) 85 (31, 85) 3
*
*
Anderson County Rural Yes 16.6 (10.5, 25.3) 56 (4, 85) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Barren County Rural Yes 20.4 (15.4, 26.7) 28 (4, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Bath County Rural Yes 22.0 (12.7, 35.7) 19 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.5)
Bell County Rural Yes 24.7 (17.7, 33.9) 7 (1, 73) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Boone County Urban Yes 12.4 (10.0, 15.3) 82 (47, 85) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.6)
Bourbon County Urban Yes 16.5 (10.3, 25.4) 58 (3, 85) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.2, -1.8)
Boyd County Urban Yes 18.1 (13.7, 23.5) 45 (8, 82) 12 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.2)
Boyle County Rural Yes 18.1 (12.7, 25.3) 44 (3, 84) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.4)
Breathitt County Rural Yes 20.8 (12.2, 33.5) 25 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Breckinridge County Rural Yes 15.2 (9.5, 23.4) 70 (8, 85) 5
*
*
Bullitt County Urban Yes 14.8 (11.5, 18.8) 71 (25, 84) 14 stable stable trend 14.1 (-1.1, 23.1)
Butler County Urban Yes 21.8 (12.9, 35.2) 20 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Caldwell County Rural Yes 18.5 (10.8, 30.4) 38 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Calloway County Rural Yes 13.8 (9.1, 20.1) 76 (19, 85) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-22.2, -0.5)
Campbell County Urban Yes 12.7 (9.9, 16.0) 81 (44, 85) 15 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.4, -2.8)
Carter County Urban Yes 23.5 (16.8, 32.2) 11 (1, 75) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.8)
Casey County Rural Yes 18.3 (11.2, 28.9) 41 (2, 85) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.3)
Christian County Urban Yes 17.0 (12.8, 22.0) 51 (13, 83) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Clark County Urban Yes 23.1 (17.4, 30.3) 13 (1, 70) 11
*
*
Clay County Rural Yes 26.0 (17.6, 37.2) 5 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 4.0)
Daviess County Urban Yes 13.0 (10.3, 16.1) 80 (41, 85) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Edmonson County Urban Yes 17.0 (9.4, 29.3) 50 (2, 85) 3
*
*
Estill County Rural Yes 16.1 (9.0, 27.3) 61 (2, 85) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Fayette County Urban Yes 10.9 (9.4, 12.7) 84 (67, 85) 37 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.5)
Fleming County Rural Yes 22.1 (13.9, 34.0) 17 (1, 85) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 2.1)
Floyd County Rural Yes 22.0 (16.1, 29.5) 18 (1, 76) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Franklin County Rural Yes 15.5 (11.4, 20.6) 68 (15, 85) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Garrard County Rural Yes 18.4 (11.4, 28.6) 39 (2, 85) 4 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.8)
Grant County Urban Yes 16.3 (10.0, 25.0) 60 (5, 85) 4
*
*
Graves County Rural Yes 14.4 (10.1, 20.0) 73 (20, 85) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Grayson County Rural Yes 24.7 (17.5, 34.1) 6 (1, 71) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 3.3)
Greenup County Urban Yes 17.3 (12.6, 23.5) 48 (9, 84) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.2)
Hardin County Urban Yes 17.5 (14.4, 21.2) 46 (15, 77) 22 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Harlan County Rural Yes 23.9 (17.3, 32.5) 8 (1, 70) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Harrison County Rural Yes 22.5 (14.9, 32.9) 16 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.6)
Hart County Rural Yes 16.8 (10.1, 26.6) 54 (3, 85) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Henderson County Rural Yes 18.4 (13.6, 24.4) 40 (6, 82) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Henry County Urban Yes 18.3 (10.8, 29.4) 42 (2, 85) 4
*
*
Hopkins County Rural Yes 15.6 (11.2, 21.1) 67 (15, 85) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.5)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 13.3 (12.3, 14.4) 78 (57, 82) 128 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.1, -2.2)
Jessamine County Urban Yes 11.0 (7.6, 15.4) 83 (46, 85) 7 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.1, -2.6)
Johnson County Rural Yes 18.6 (12.0, 27.7) 37 (2, 85) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 2.0)
Kenton County Urban Yes 15.2 (12.7, 18.1) 69 (31, 82) 28 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.8, 2.1)
Knott County Rural Yes 19.6 (10.9, 32.6) 32 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Knox County Rural Yes 22.6 (16.4, 30.7) 15 (1, 73) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 3.1)
Laurel County Rural Yes 15.8 (12.0, 20.5) 64 (19, 84) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.2, 0.0)
Lawrence County Urban Yes 20.9 (12.7, 32.8) 23 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Letcher County Rural Yes 19.8 (13.1, 29.0) 30 (2, 84) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Lewis County Rural Yes 29.1 (18.6, 43.9) 2 (1, 77) 5
*
*
Lincoln County Rural Yes 23.3 (16.5, 32.1) 12 (1, 74) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-8.8, 1.2)
Logan County Rural Yes 18.7 (13.1, 26.2) 36 (4, 84) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Madison County Rural Yes 13.8 (10.6, 17.6) 75 (33, 85) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.6)
Magoffin County Rural Yes 23.8 (13.3, 39.7) 9 (1, 85) 3
*
*
Marion County Rural Yes 19.2 (12.2, 29.1) 34 (2, 85) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Marshall County Rural Yes 14.2 (9.8, 20.2) 74 (19, 85) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.8)
Mason County Rural Yes 20.6 (12.9, 31.5) 27 (1, 85) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.9)
McCracken County Urban Yes 13.3 (10.1, 17.3) 79 (32, 85) 13 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
McCreary County Rural Yes 19.4 (11.7, 30.5) 33 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Meade County Urban Yes 18.9 (12.9, 26.8) 35 (3, 84) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.3)
Mercer County Rural Yes 19.6 (13.2, 28.4) 31 (2, 84) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.2)
Monroe County Rural Yes 28.2 (17.3, 44.0) 3 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Montgomery County Rural Yes 22.8 (16.1, 31.5) 14 (1, 76) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 1.0)
Morgan County Rural Yes 23.6 (14.2, 37.4) 10 (1, 85) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.3)
Muhlenberg County Rural Yes 17.1 (12.0, 24.0) 49 (7, 85) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.2)
Nelson County Urban Yes 21.2 (16.0, 27.6) 22 (2, 77) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.6)
Ohio County Rural Yes 20.7 (14.0, 29.7) 26 (1, 83) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Oldham County Urban Yes 14.7 (10.9, 19.4) 72 (19, 85) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.6)
Perry County Rural Yes 27.8 (20.6, 36.9) 4 (1, 52) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.8)
Pike County Rural Yes 21.4 (17.0, 26.7) 21 (3, 66) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Powell County Rural Yes 31.5 (19.4, 48.5) 1 (1, 77) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 9.5)
Pulaski County Rural Yes 17.4 (13.6, 22.1) 47 (12, 80) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Rockcastle County Rural Yes 20.2 (12.5, 31.3) 29 (1, 85) 5
*
*
Rowan County Rural Yes 18.2 (11.4, 27.5) 43 (2, 85) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.4)
Russell County Rural Yes 16.8 (10.0, 26.9) 55 (2, 85) 4
*
*
Scott County Urban Yes 13.6 (9.5, 19.0) 77 (22, 85) 7
*
*
Shelby County Urban Yes 16.4 (11.8, 22.2) 59 (11, 85) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Simpson County Rural Yes 16.6 (10.0, 26.1) 57 (4, 85) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.1)
Taylor County Rural Yes 16.9 (11.2, 24.7) 53 (4, 85) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Union County Rural Yes 20.8 (12.3, 33.5) 24 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Warren County Urban Yes 16.9 (13.9, 20.4) 52 (20, 77) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Wayne County Rural Yes 15.9 (10.0, 24.4) 62 (6, 85) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 3.1)
Whitley County Rural Yes 15.8 (10.9, 22.3) 63 (10, 85) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -1.0)
Woodford County Urban Yes 15.7 (10.2, 23.3) 65 (8, 85) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Ballard County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bracken County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlisle County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crittenden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elliott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Larue County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leslie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McLean County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Metcalfe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicholas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trigg County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trimble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wolfe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/15/2024 12:39 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top