Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 25.1?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky N/A No 50.9 (50.0, 51.7) N/A 2,986 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.4, -3.9)
United States N/A No 32.4 (32.3, 32.5) N/A 136,831 falling falling trend -4.3 (-4.4, -4.1)
Woodford County Urban No 39.1 (30.7, 49.3) 115 (60, 119) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Wolfe County Rural No 73.4 (50.2, 104.9) 15 (1, 116) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.5)
Whitley County Rural No 79.8 (68.5, 92.6) 9 (1, 48) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Webster County Rural No 53.1 (38.8, 71.5) 71 (8, 119) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Wayne County Rural No 48.6 (37.9, 61.9) 91 (27, 118) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Washington County Rural No 46.3 (32.7, 64.4) 103 (18, 119) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
Warren County Urban No 48.9 (43.8, 54.4) 88 (54, 111) 69 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Union County Rural No 50.3 (37.0, 67.4) 81 (15, 119) 10 falling falling trend -5.7 (-25.7, -1.7)
Trimble County Rural No 54.4 (36.6, 78.7) 70 (3, 119) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.3)
Trigg County Urban No 55.6 (42.8, 71.9) 63 (12, 116) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Todd County Rural No 65.5 (48.9, 86.5) 34 (2, 115) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Taylor County Rural No 56.9 (46.2, 69.6) 56 (14, 112) 20 falling falling trend -4.1 (-18.5, -0.4)
Spencer County Urban No 42.0 (30.8, 56.3) 111 (40, 119) 10 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.1)
Simpson County Rural No 53.0 (41.0, 67.7) 72 (14, 118) 14 falling falling trend -4.5 (-14.8, -1.1)
Shelby County Urban No 47.6 (39.8, 56.5) 96 (40, 117) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.5)
Scott County Urban No 42.5 (35.0, 51.1) 109 (59, 119) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3)
Russell County Rural No 69.4 (55.8, 85.7) 23 (2, 93) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Rowan County Rural No 60.2 (47.7, 75.1) 48 (6, 113) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Rockcastle County Rural No 62.1 (48.6, 78.7) 39 (3, 111) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Pulaski County Rural No 52.8 (46.4, 59.9) 75 (33, 105) 51 falling falling trend -3.8 (-11.6, -1.5)
Powell County Rural No 75.5 (57.7, 97.4) 14 (1, 93) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.0)
Pike County Rural No 65.1 (57.5, 73.6) 35 (11, 73) 56 falling falling trend -3.1 (-9.7, -1.4)
Perry County Rural No 79.9 (67.5, 94.1) 8 (1, 50) 31 falling falling trend -3.8 (-15.6, -1.1)
Pendleton County Urban No 73.3 (56.5, 93.9) 16 (1, 101) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.4)
Owsley County Rural No 97.5 (64.1, 144.0) 1 (1, 107) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.7)
Owen County Rural No 55.8 (40.6, 75.7) 60 (4, 119) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Oldham County Urban No 29.9 (24.5, 36.2) 119 (109, 119) 23 falling falling trend -5.5 (-15.2, -3.2)
Ohio County Rural No 67.4 (55.3, 81.5) 29 (3, 90) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Nicholas County Rural No 47.2 (30.3, 71.2) 100 (5, 119) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.8)
Nelson County Urban No 49.7 (42.0, 58.6) 85 (37, 115) 30 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Muhlenberg County Rural No 48.2 (39.5, 58.6) 92 (37, 118) 22 falling falling trend -8.6 (-27.5, -1.8)
Morgan County Rural No 58.9 (44.0, 77.7) 51 (5, 116) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Montgomery County Rural No 76.2 (63.8, 90.4) 13 (1, 60) 28 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Monroe County Rural No 60.4 (44.5, 81.0) 45 (4, 116) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Metcalfe County Rural No 66.8 (49.9, 88.4) 31 (1, 111) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.6)
Mercer County Rural No 57.5 (46.5, 70.8) 53 (10, 111) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Menifee County Rural No 68.2 (47.1, 97.7) 26 (1, 115) 7 stable stable trend -28.0 (-55.5, 1.2)
Meade County Urban No 55.1 (44.6, 67.5) 67 (18, 115) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.6, 0.0)
McLean County Urban No 65.0 (46.9, 88.6) 36 (1, 117) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
McCreary County Rural No 77.2 (60.9, 96.8) 11 (1, 77) 16 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
McCracken County Urban No 43.6 (38.0, 49.9) 108 (64, 117) 45 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.4, -2.5)
Mason County Rural No 55.8 (42.7, 71.9) 61 (8, 117) 13 falling falling trend -7.6 (-24.1, -0.9)
Martin County Rural No 66.1 (48.6, 88.5) 32 (1, 113) 10 falling falling trend -6.3 (-24.6, -0.9)
Marshall County Rural No 56.7 (47.7, 67.2) 57 (18, 108) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Marion County Rural No 46.0 (35.1, 59.6) 105 (31, 119) 13 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Magoffin County Rural No 67.8 (50.4, 89.7) 27 (1, 111) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Madison County Rural No 48.0 (42.1, 54.5) 94 (52, 114) 50 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.2)
Lyon County Rural No 34.9 (23.1, 53.2) 117 (57, 119) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Logan County Rural No 51.8 (42.0, 63.4) 78 (22, 116) 20 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.8, -2.8)
Livingston County Urban No 69.1 (51.0, 92.8) 24 (1, 111) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 65.6 (53.9, 79.5) 33 (4, 95) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-12.3, -0.8)
Lewis County Rural No 72.5 (56.0, 92.9) 18 (1, 99) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.7)
Letcher County Rural No 51.2 (40.8, 63.8) 79 (23, 118) 18 falling falling trend -5.9 (-21.5, -2.2)
Leslie County Rural No 85.1 (65.4, 109.6) 3 (1, 68) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Lee County Rural No 61.6 (41.5, 89.3) 41 (1, 119) 6 falling falling trend -4.1 (-24.2, -2.0)
Lawrence County Urban No 70.0 (55.3, 88.0) 21 (1, 96) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-10.3, -0.8)
Laurel County Rural No 60.0 (52.5, 68.4) 49 (17, 90) 48 falling falling trend -5.1 (-16.6, -0.5)
Larue County Urban No 53.0 (39.8, 69.7) 73 (15, 118) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.6)
Knox County Rural No 81.9 (69.9, 95.6) 4 (1, 47) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.9)
Knott County Rural No 56.3 (42.8, 73.3) 59 (7, 117) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Kenton County Urban No 47.9 (43.5, 52.6) 95 (59, 111) 93 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -2.8)
Johnson County Rural No 60.4 (48.7, 74.3) 46 (7, 110) 19 falling falling trend -15.8 (-27.2, -2.3)
Jessamine County Urban No 47.5 (40.2, 55.7) 98 (44, 116) 32 falling falling trend -12.2 (-20.0, -1.9)
Jefferson County Urban No 41.9 (40.1, 43.8) 112 (95, 115) 416 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.8, -3.6)
Jackson County Rural No 54.8 (39.9, 73.9) 68 (6, 118) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Hopkins County Rural No 55.5 (47.5, 64.5) 65 (24, 107) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Hickman County Rural No 55.6 (35.9, 86.7) 64 (2, 119) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Henry County Urban No 46.9 (34.9, 62.2) 101 (25, 119) 11 falling falling trend -6.3 (-23.0, -1.9)
Henderson County Rural No 49.9 (42.4, 58.5) 84 (36, 114) 33 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Hart County Rural No 59.7 (46.9, 75.1) 50 (6, 112) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Harrison County Rural No 62.8 (50.0, 78.3) 38 (4, 107) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.9)
Harlan County Rural No 80.3 (67.8, 94.7) 7 (1, 52) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Hardin County Urban No 50.3 (44.8, 56.2) 82 (47, 109) 65 falling falling trend -4.5 (-12.4, -1.7)
Hancock County Rural No 50.2 (34.2, 72.0) 83 (8, 119) 6 falling falling trend -4.6 (-27.6, -0.8)
Greenup County Urban No 47.3 (39.6, 56.4) 99 (43, 117) 27 falling falling trend -2.4 (-8.6, -1.5)
Green County Rural No 58.4 (43.4, 77.9) 52 (5, 117) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Grayson County Rural No 70.0 (58.1, 83.8) 22 (2, 78) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Graves County Rural No 48.8 (40.7, 58.2) 89 (37, 116) 26 falling falling trend -3.8 (-15.5, -1.2)
Grant County Urban No 52.1 (40.6, 65.9) 77 (18, 118) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Garrard County Rural No 57.3 (44.7, 72.7) 54 (9, 115) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 0.7)
Gallatin County Urban No 48.7 (31.3, 73.1) 90 (7, 119) 5 falling falling trend -18.1 (-42.0, -3.8)
Fulton County Rural No 81.4 (57.5, 113.5) 5 (1, 105) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.2)
Franklin County Rural No 39.5 (33.0, 47.0) 114 (71, 119) 28 falling falling trend -9.4 (-17.1, -5.8)
Floyd County Rural No 76.2 (65.7, 88.1) 12 (1, 55) 40 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.5, -1.4)
Fleming County Rural No 55.6 (42.1, 72.6) 62 (8, 117) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Fayette County Urban No 34.5 (31.8, 37.5) 118 (110, 119) 122 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.3, -3.4)
Estill County Rural No 64.2 (49.6, 82.5) 37 (2, 111) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Elliott County Rural No 52.7 (34.9, 77.9) 76 (3, 119) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.9)
Edmonson County Urban No 55.5 (41.5, 73.5) 66 (8, 117) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Daviess County Urban No 45.8 (40.7, 51.3) 107 (61, 115) 62 falling falling trend -6.4 (-9.4, -4.6)
Cumberland County Rural No 61.5 (41.8, 89.7) 42 (1, 119) 6 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 3.0)
Crittenden County Rural No 53.0 (36.9, 74.8) 74 (5, 119) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Clinton County Rural No 72.7 (54.2, 96.5) 17 (1, 107) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.4)
Clay County Rural No 78.4 (63.6, 95.8) 10 (1, 64) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Clark County Urban No 47.5 (39.3, 57.0) 97 (42, 117) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Christian County Urban No 50.4 (43.1, 58.7) 80 (35, 114) 34 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Casey County Rural No 56.4 (44.0, 71.9) 58 (9, 116) 14 stable stable trend -6.3 (-12.3, 5.2)
Carter County Urban No 67.4 (56.4, 80.3) 28 (4, 90) 27 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Carroll County Rural No 90.3 (69.0, 116.6) 2 (1, 61) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.2)
Carlisle County Urban No 71.6 (47.5, 106.0) 20 (1, 116) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 3.0)
Campbell County Urban No 46.2 (40.8, 52.2) 104 (56, 115) 55 falling falling trend -3.7 (-10.1, -2.2)
Calloway County Rural No 60.2 (50.7, 71.3) 47 (12, 102) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Caldwell County Rural No 49.3 (35.9, 66.9) 86 (11, 119) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Butler County Urban No 81.3 (63.0, 103.7) 6 (1, 78) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Bullitt County Urban No 41.6 (36.2, 47.8) 113 (73, 118) 44 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.6)
Breckinridge County Rural No 66.8 (54.4, 81.6) 30 (3, 99) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Breathitt County Rural No 72.2 (55.5, 92.9) 19 (1, 97) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Bracken County Urban No 57.1 (38.7, 82.2) 55 (2, 119) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Boyle County Rural No 45.9 (37.1, 56.3) 106 (37, 118) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.3, 12.2)
Boyd County Urban No 49.1 (41.9, 57.3) 87 (42, 114) 35 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.5, -1.5)
Bourbon County Urban No 48.1 (37.6, 61.0) 93 (27, 119) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Boone County Urban No 37.9 (33.6, 42.7) 116 (95, 119) 58 falling falling trend -6.5 (-15.0, -3.0)
Bell County Rural No 68.4 (56.5, 82.5) 25 (2, 89) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Bath County Rural No 54.5 (40.0, 73.2) 69 (7, 118) 10 falling falling trend -8.0 (-21.5, -1.2)
Barren County Rural No 61.1 (52.5, 70.9) 43 (13, 93) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Ballard County Urban No 46.3 (30.9, 68.5) 102 (15, 119) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.2)
Anderson County Rural No 42.3 (32.4, 54.5) 110 (43, 119) 13 falling falling trend -7.2 (-17.2, -2.9)
Allen County Urban No 60.5 (48.3, 75.1) 44 (6, 110) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-6.9, -0.8)
Adair County Rural No 61.7 (48.9, 77.2) 40 (4, 110) 17 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Robertson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/10/2024 3:48 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top