Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana *** 172.5 (170.9, 174.1) N/A 9,385 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.6)
United States *** 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) N/A 598,381 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Winn Parish *** 173.1 (147.6, 202.1) 40 (4, 63) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
West Feliciana Parish *** 161.8 (136.6, 190.7) 56 (8, 64) 31 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.5)
West Carroll Parish *** 197.3 (166.5, 232.7) 12 (1, 61) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
West Baton Rouge Parish *** 165.8 (145.0, 188.7) 48 (11, 63) 48 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Webster Parish *** 191.3 (175.2, 208.7) 19 (3, 47) 108 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Washington Parish *** 197.9 (182.1, 214.8) 11 (2, 40) 122 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Vernon Parish *** 211.4 (192.6, 231.6) 3 (1, 33) 95 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Vermilion Parish *** 162.1 (149.1, 176.0) 55 (28, 63) 118 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.7)
Union Parish *** 183.4 (162.2, 206.8) 29 (3, 60) 59 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Terrebonne Parish *** 195.2 (184.2, 206.7) 16 (4, 36) 244 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Tensas Parish *** 152.8 (117.5, 198.6) 62 (4, 64) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Tangipahoa Parish *** 182.2 (172.2, 192.7) 32 (12, 47) 261 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
St. Tammany Parish *** 154.4 (148.1, 160.8) 60 (47, 62) 487 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
St. Mary Parish *** 202.8 (187.1, 219.4) 9 (2, 36) 130 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
St. Martin Parish *** 174.8 (160.0, 190.6) 37 (12, 60) 108 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
St. Landry Parish *** 201.7 (189.2, 214.8) 10 (2, 31) 202 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
St. John the Baptist Parish *** 170.6 (153.9, 188.7) 43 (11, 62) 82 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
St. James Parish *** 163.8 (142.4, 187.7) 50 (11, 63) 45 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
St. Helena Parish *** 172.7 (143.3, 207.1) 41 (2, 63) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
St. Charles Parish *** 166.9 (151.5, 183.4) 46 (18, 62) 93 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
St. Bernard Parish *** 180.3 (162.1, 200.0) 34 (5, 60) 77 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.1, -1.9)
Sabine Parish *** 170.8 (151.2, 192.6) 42 (10, 63) 59 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Richland Parish *** 176.7 (154.1, 201.9) 35 (4, 62) 46 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Red River Parish *** 206.4 (171.3, 247.4) 5 (1, 60) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Rapides Parish *** 168.6 (159.5, 178.0) 45 (28, 60) 268 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Pointe Coupee Parish *** 154.3 (135.3, 175.7) 61 (23, 64) 51 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Plaquemines Parish *** 173.5 (150.9, 198.7) 38 (6, 63) 44 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Ouachita Parish *** 191.3 (182.1, 200.8) 20 (6, 38) 336 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Orleans Parish *** 154.9 (149.6, 160.4) 59 (47, 62) 682 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.7, -2.6)
Natchitoches Parish *** 196.3 (178.2, 215.8) 14 (2, 44) 90 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Morehouse Parish *** 206.0 (184.4, 229.6) 6 (1, 41) 71 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Madison Parish *** 221.3 (185.4, 262.3) 2 (1, 46) 28 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Livingston Parish *** 162.6 (153.1, 172.6) 54 (34, 62) 232 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Lincoln Parish *** 169.0 (152.7, 186.6) 44 (15, 62) 81 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Lafayette Parish *** 163.9 (156.7, 171.4) 49 (36, 60) 404 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.6)
LaFourche Parish *** 183.1 (172.2, 194.6) 30 (10, 48) 215 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
La Salle Parish *** 159.3 (134.6, 187.5) 58 (8, 64) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Jefferson Parish *** 162.7 (157.9, 167.6) 53 (40, 59) 905 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.6)
Jefferson Davis Parish *** 204.5 (184.5, 226.2) 8 (1, 39) 79 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Jackson Parish *** 190.7 (165.3, 219.3) 21 (2, 60) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Iberville Parish *** 184.2 (165.5, 204.5) 27 (4, 59) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Iberia Parish *** 183.8 (170.6, 197.7) 28 (8, 50) 152 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Grant Parish *** 166.6 (144.6, 191.1) 47 (10, 63) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Franklin Parish *** 163.6 (142.4, 187.2) 52 (12, 63) 45 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Evangeline Parish *** 190.5 (171.6, 211.0) 22 (3, 53) 76 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
East Feliciana Parish *** 187.0 (163.5, 213.1) 25 (2, 60) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
East Carroll Parish *** 271.3 (222.1, 328.4) 1 (1, 20) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
East Baton Rouge Parish *** 159.6 (154.4, 164.9) 57 (42, 61) 749 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
De Soto Parish *** 196.7 (176.4, 219.0) 13 (2, 51) 71 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Concordia Parish *** 205.8 (181.2, 233.1) 7 (1, 48) 53 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Claiborne Parish *** 173.2 (149.2, 200.4) 39 (5, 63) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Catahoula Parish *** 211.3 (176.0, 252.1) 4 (1, 57) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Cameron Parish *** 106.4 (77.9, 142.8) 64 (54, 64) 10 falling falling trend -7.1 (-9.8, -4.3)
Caldwell Parish *** 175.3 (143.9, 212.0) 36 (2, 63) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Calcasieu Parish *** 186.4 (178.4, 194.6) 26 (11, 41) 428 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Caddo Parish *** 182.7 (175.9, 189.7) 31 (15, 42) 571 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Bossier Parish *** 163.6 (154.0, 173.5) 51 (32, 62) 226 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Bienville Parish *** 195.4 (168.0, 226.4) 15 (2, 60) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Beauregard Parish *** 188.8 (170.6, 208.4) 23 (3, 53) 82 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Avoyelles Parish *** 192.8 (175.9, 211.0) 17 (2, 48) 99 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Assumption Parish *** 180.5 (158.6, 204.7) 33 (3, 62) 52 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Ascension Parish *** 138.9 (129.0, 149.3) 63 (58, 64) 159 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Allen Parish *** 188.7 (166.9, 212.7) 24 (2, 59) 55 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Acadia Parish *** 192.7 (178.5, 207.9) 18 (3, 43) 141 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2021 6:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top