Death Rates Table
Parish
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louisiana | No | 921.5 (911.3, 931.9) | N/A | 6,323 |
falling 
|
-1.8 (-1.9, -1.6) |
| United States | No | 855.4 (854.2, 856.5) | N/A | 431,628 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.2, -1.7) |
| Cameron Parish | No | 611.9 (425.2, 852.6) | 64 (28, 64) | 7 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-4.1, -1.0) |
| West Baton Rouge Parish | No | 755.0 (629.7, 897.9) | 63 (26, 64) | 26 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.0, -1.3) |
| Caldwell Parish | No | 781.8 (605.7, 993.3) | 62 (8, 64) | 14 |
stable 
|
-1.1 (-2.2, 0.0) |
| Franklin Parish | No | 814.9 (687.0, 959.8) | 61 (16, 64) | 29 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.8) |
| Orleans Parish | No | 819.6 (785.3, 855.0) | 60 (46, 63) | 449 |
falling
|
-3.3 (-4.1, -2.6) |
| Ascension Parish | No | 819.9 (750.6, 893.9) | 59 (33, 64) | 109 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.3, -1.3) |
| West Feliciana Parish | No | 832.6 (668.9, 1,024.7) | 58 (8, 64) | 19 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-3.4, -1.4) |
| East Baton Rouge Parish | No | 840.5 (807.3, 874.7) | 57 (42, 62) | 498 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.2) |
| Claiborne Parish | No | 840.9 (699.4, 1,002.5) | 56 (8, 64) | 25 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
| St. Tammany Parish | No | 870.9 (829.9, 913.3) | 55 (32, 61) | 351 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.5, -1.6) |
| La Salle Parish | No | 871.4 (713.2, 1,054.3) | 54 (4, 64) | 21 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.8, -0.1) |
| Pointe Coupee Parish | No | 872.3 (752.1, 1,006.4) | 53 (8, 64) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.7) |
| Rapides Parish | No | 876.7 (820.1, 936.3) | 52 (24, 61) | 180 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.0) |
| Bossier Parish | No | 882.0 (820.6, 946.7) | 51 (23, 62) | 155 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.6, -1.6) |
| Livingston Parish | No | 886.0 (822.7, 952.8) | 50 (21, 62) | 153 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.2, -1.4) |
| Sabine Parish | No | 895.0 (777.4, 1,025.2) | 49 (7, 63) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.5) |
| St. James Parish | No | 897.6 (760.5, 1,052.0) | 48 (5, 64) | 31 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.3, -0.8) |
| Lafayette Parish | No | 898.5 (850.5, 948.4) | 47 (24, 58) | 272 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.5, -1.5) |
| St. Martin Parish | No | 899.3 (804.9, 1,001.7) | 46 (12, 63) | 68 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.9) |
| Jefferson Parish | No | 902.2 (871.0, 934.3) | 45 (26, 55) | 645 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.1, -1.6) |
| De Soto Parish | No | 905.0 (786.2, 1,036.7) | 44 (7, 63) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.0, -0.7) |
| Grant Parish | No | 907.1 (763.5, 1,069.9) | 43 (4, 64) | 29 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.3, -0.5) |
| St. Bernard Parish | No | 910.6 (793.0, 1,040.7) | 42 (7, 63) | 45 |
falling
|
-5.6 (-8.0, -3.0) |
| Vermilion Parish | No | 914.7 (828.0, 1,008.0) | 41 (12, 62) | 83 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.3) |
| Lincoln Parish | No | 921.0 (817.5, 1,033.9) | 40 (8, 62) | 59 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.4, -0.3) |
| Union Parish | No | 924.0 (800.8, 1,060.8) | 39 (5, 63) | 41 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.6) |
| Caddo Parish | No | 924.5 (882.5, 967.9) | 38 (21, 53) | 373 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.3, -1.3) |
| LaFourche Parish | No | 926.4 (857.7, 999.3) | 37 (13, 58) | 136 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.6) |
| St. John the Baptist Parish | No | 938.7 (826.1, 1,062.4) | 36 (5, 62) | 53 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.8, -0.3) |
| Winn Parish | No | 947.6 (787.8, 1,130.4) | 35 (3, 63) | 25 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.7, -0.2) |
| St. Mary Parish | No | 948.0 (854.1, 1,049.4) | 34 (6, 60) | 75 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.9) |
| Iberia Parish | No | 956.4 (872.2, 1,046.6) | 33 (7, 57) | 96 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7) |
| Assumption Parish | No | 957.2 (820.4, 1,110.0) | 32 (3, 63) | 36 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.7) |
| Richland Parish | No | 959.7 (816.9, 1,120.2) | 31 (2, 63) | 33 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.3, -0.8) |
| Jackson Parish | No | 960.9 (813.3, 1,127.4) | 30 (3, 63) | 30 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
| Evangeline Parish | No | 961.6 (843.3, 1,091.8) | 29 (4, 62) | 48 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
| Acadia Parish | No | 964.6 (876.1, 1,059.6) | 28 (6, 58) | 88 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.6, -0.7) |
| St. Helena Parish | No | 969.4 (780.9, 1,189.5) | 27 (2, 64) | 19 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.1, 0.1) |
| Calcasieu Parish | No | 970.6 (919.8, 1,023.5) | 26 (10, 46) | 278 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.6, -1.0) |
| Iberville Parish | No | 970.9 (850.3, 1,103.7) | 25 (3, 61) | 48 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.8) |
| St. Charles Parish | No | 972.5 (866.5, 1,087.9) | 24 (4, 59) | 64 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
| Plaquemines Parish | No | 977.0 (825.2, 1,148.7) | 23 (2, 63) | 30 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.5, -0.5) |
| Red River Parish | No | 981.9 (774.2, 1,228.0) | 22 (2, 64) | 15 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.9, 1.4) |
| Tensas Parish | No | 983.3 (732.4, 1,292.6) | 21 (1, 64) | 11 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.7, -0.3) |
| Washington Parish | No | 991.8 (896.0, 1,095.1) | 20 (4, 57) | 80 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Bienville Parish | No | 992.3 (832.2, 1,174.2) | 19 (2, 62) | 27 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.5, -0.1) |
| Morehouse Parish | No | 993.7 (868.4, 1,132.0) | 18 (3, 61) | 46 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.2) |
| Tangipahoa Parish | No | 995.4 (929.8, 1,064.5) | 17 (6, 44) | 179 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.1) |
| Natchitoches Parish | No | 1,004.7 (895.3, 1,123.7) | 16 (3, 56) | 62 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.4) |
| East Feliciana Parish | No | 1,017.2 (864.0, 1,189.7) | 15 (2, 62) | 33 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.6, 0.0) |
| Concordia Parish | No | 1,023.8 (874.9, 1,190.6) | 14 (2, 60) | 34 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.8, -0.3) |
| Ouachita Parish | No | 1,024.2 (964.9, 1,086.2) | 13 (5, 37) | 226 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.5) |
| West Carroll Parish | No | 1,027.8 (842.0, 1,242.3) | 12 (1, 62) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.8, -0.2) |
| Webster Parish | No | 1,042.8 (941.7, 1,151.8) | 11 (2, 48) | 78 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.6, -0.7) |
| Terrebonne Parish | No | 1,043.6 (971.6, 1,119.5) | 10 (3, 36) | 159 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) |
| St. Landry Parish | No | 1,064.2 (984.8, 1,148.2) | 9 (3, 34) | 135 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-0.9, -0.3) |
| Catahoula Parish | No | 1,076.2 (858.7, 1,332.1) | 8 (1, 63) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.0, 0.9) |
| Avoyelles Parish | No | 1,091.3 (981.1, 1,210.5) | 7 (2, 38) | 73 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
| Jefferson Davis Parish | No | 1,105.3 (978.3, 1,244.0) | 6 (1, 44) | 55 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
| Allen Parish | No | 1,107.0 (959.0, 1,271.2) | 5 (1, 49) | 41 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.8, 0.2) |
| Beauregard Parish | No | 1,112.6 (990.4, 1,245.6) | 4 (2, 40) | 62 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.2, -0.1) |
| Madison Parish | No | 1,131.5 (907.6, 1,394.3) | 3 (1, 61) | 18 |
stable
|
3.3 (-2.0, 9.0) |
| Vernon Parish | No | 1,223.4 (1,097.2, 1,360.1) | 2 (1, 17) | 70 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.2, 1.0) |
| East Carroll Parish | No | 1,533.0 (1,201.9, 1,926.7) | 1 (1, 25) | 15 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.0, 1.0) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2023 10:39 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2023 10:39 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.