Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Rate
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana No 921.5 (911.3, 931.9) N/A 6,323 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
United States No 855.4 (854.2, 856.5) N/A 431,628 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Cameron Parish No 611.9 (425.2, 852.6) 64 (28, 64) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.0)
West Baton Rouge Parish No 755.0 (629.7, 897.9) 63 (26, 64) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Caldwell Parish No 781.8 (605.7, 993.3) 62 (8, 64) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Franklin Parish No 814.9 (687.0, 959.8) 61 (16, 64) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Orleans Parish No 819.6 (785.3, 855.0) 60 (46, 63) 449 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.1, -2.6)
Ascension Parish No 819.9 (750.6, 893.9) 59 (33, 64) 109 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
West Feliciana Parish No 832.6 (668.9, 1,024.7) 58 (8, 64) 19 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
East Baton Rouge Parish No 840.5 (807.3, 874.7) 57 (42, 62) 498 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Claiborne Parish No 840.9 (699.4, 1,002.5) 56 (8, 64) 25 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
St. Tammany Parish No 870.9 (829.9, 913.3) 55 (32, 61) 351 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
La Salle Parish No 871.4 (713.2, 1,054.3) 54 (4, 64) 21 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Pointe Coupee Parish No 872.3 (752.1, 1,006.4) 53 (8, 64) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Rapides Parish No 876.7 (820.1, 936.3) 52 (24, 61) 180 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Bossier Parish No 882.0 (820.6, 946.7) 51 (23, 62) 155 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Livingston Parish No 886.0 (822.7, 952.8) 50 (21, 62) 153 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Sabine Parish No 895.0 (777.4, 1,025.2) 49 (7, 63) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
St. James Parish No 897.6 (760.5, 1,052.0) 48 (5, 64) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Lafayette Parish No 898.5 (850.5, 948.4) 47 (24, 58) 272 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
St. Martin Parish No 899.3 (804.9, 1,001.7) 46 (12, 63) 68 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Jefferson Parish No 902.2 (871.0, 934.3) 45 (26, 55) 645 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
De Soto Parish No 905.0 (786.2, 1,036.7) 44 (7, 63) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Grant Parish No 907.1 (763.5, 1,069.9) 43 (4, 64) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
St. Bernard Parish No 910.6 (793.0, 1,040.7) 42 (7, 63) 45 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.0, -3.0)
Vermilion Parish No 914.7 (828.0, 1,008.0) 41 (12, 62) 83 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Lincoln Parish No 921.0 (817.5, 1,033.9) 40 (8, 62) 59 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Union Parish No 924.0 (800.8, 1,060.8) 39 (5, 63) 41 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Caddo Parish No 924.5 (882.5, 967.9) 38 (21, 53) 373 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
LaFourche Parish No 926.4 (857.7, 999.3) 37 (13, 58) 136 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
St. John the Baptist Parish No 938.7 (826.1, 1,062.4) 36 (5, 62) 53 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Winn Parish No 947.6 (787.8, 1,130.4) 35 (3, 63) 25 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
St. Mary Parish No 948.0 (854.1, 1,049.4) 34 (6, 60) 75 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Iberia Parish No 956.4 (872.2, 1,046.6) 33 (7, 57) 96 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Assumption Parish No 957.2 (820.4, 1,110.0) 32 (3, 63) 36 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Richland Parish No 959.7 (816.9, 1,120.2) 31 (2, 63) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Jackson Parish No 960.9 (813.3, 1,127.4) 30 (3, 63) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Evangeline Parish No 961.6 (843.3, 1,091.8) 29 (4, 62) 48 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Acadia Parish No 964.6 (876.1, 1,059.6) 28 (6, 58) 88 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
St. Helena Parish No 969.4 (780.9, 1,189.5) 27 (2, 64) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Calcasieu Parish No 970.6 (919.8, 1,023.5) 26 (10, 46) 278 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Iberville Parish No 970.9 (850.3, 1,103.7) 25 (3, 61) 48 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
St. Charles Parish No 972.5 (866.5, 1,087.9) 24 (4, 59) 64 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Plaquemines Parish No 977.0 (825.2, 1,148.7) 23 (2, 63) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Red River Parish No 981.9 (774.2, 1,228.0) 22 (2, 64) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Tensas Parish No 983.3 (732.4, 1,292.6) 21 (1, 64) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Washington Parish No 991.8 (896.0, 1,095.1) 20 (4, 57) 80 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Bienville Parish No 992.3 (832.2, 1,174.2) 19 (2, 62) 27 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Morehouse Parish No 993.7 (868.4, 1,132.0) 18 (3, 61) 46 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Tangipahoa Parish No 995.4 (929.8, 1,064.5) 17 (6, 44) 179 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Natchitoches Parish No 1,004.7 (895.3, 1,123.7) 16 (3, 56) 62 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
East Feliciana Parish No 1,017.2 (864.0, 1,189.7) 15 (2, 62) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Concordia Parish No 1,023.8 (874.9, 1,190.6) 14 (2, 60) 34 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Ouachita Parish No 1,024.2 (964.9, 1,086.2) 13 (5, 37) 226 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
West Carroll Parish No 1,027.8 (842.0, 1,242.3) 12 (1, 62) 21 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Webster Parish No 1,042.8 (941.7, 1,151.8) 11 (2, 48) 78 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Terrebonne Parish No 1,043.6 (971.6, 1,119.5) 10 (3, 36) 159 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
St. Landry Parish No 1,064.2 (984.8, 1,148.2) 9 (3, 34) 135 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Catahoula Parish No 1,076.2 (858.7, 1,332.1) 8 (1, 63) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Avoyelles Parish No 1,091.3 (981.1, 1,210.5) 7 (2, 38) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Jefferson Davis Parish No 1,105.3 (978.3, 1,244.0) 6 (1, 44) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Allen Parish No 1,107.0 (959.0, 1,271.2) 5 (1, 49) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Beauregard Parish No 1,112.6 (990.4, 1,245.6) 4 (2, 40) 62 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Madison Parish No 1,131.5 (907.6, 1,394.3) 3 (1, 61) 18 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.0, 9.0)
Vernon Parish No 1,223.4 (1,097.2, 1,360.1) 2 (1, 17) 70 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
East Carroll Parish No 1,533.0 (1,201.9, 1,926.7) 1 (1, 25) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/25/2024 1:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top