Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana N/A No 138.2 (136.3, 140.1) N/A 4,262 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Winn Parish Rural No 142.0 (109.6, 182.3) 42 (2, 64) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
West Feliciana Parish Urban No 128.1 (95.0, 170.9) 55 (4, 64) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
West Carroll Parish Rural No 124.4 (90.2, 169.0) 59 (3, 64) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
West Baton Rouge Parish Urban Yes 119.9 (97.3, 146.3) 62 (16, 64) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Webster Parish Rural No 170.0 (148.9, 193.7) 8 (2, 45) 51 stable stable trend 9.7 (-0.9, 16.7)
Washington Parish Rural No 154.4 (135.6, 175.4) 22 (3, 58) 52 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Vernon Parish Rural No 170.2 (147.9, 194.9) 7 (2, 46) 43 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.5)
Vermilion Parish Urban No 145.1 (128.3, 163.7) 37 (8, 61) 57 falling falling trend -1.8 (-7.8, -0.9)
Union Parish Urban No 177.9 (148.5, 212.0) 4 (1, 49) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Terrebonne Parish Urban No 148.2 (135.4, 162.0) 30 (9, 54) 102 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Tensas Parish Rural No 196.1 (135.5, 281.7) 2 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.6)
Tangipahoa Parish Urban No 146.3 (134.5, 158.9) 35 (12, 55) 119 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
St. Tammany Parish Urban No 124.6 (117.4, 132.2) 57 (42, 63) 233 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.2, -1.4)
St. Mary Parish Rural No 142.6 (125.1, 162.1) 40 (9, 62) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
St. Martin Parish Urban No 146.3 (128.5, 166.0) 36 (6, 61) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
St. Landry Parish Rural No 176.8 (161.1, 193.7) 5 (2, 25) 99 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
St. John the Baptist Parish Urban No 137.6 (117.2, 160.7) 48 (8, 63) 34 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.8)
St. James Parish Urban No 148.7 (122.3, 179.8) 28 (3, 64) 23 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
St. Helena Parish Urban Yes 104.8 (77.3, 141.0) 64 (20, 64) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
St. Charles Parish Urban No 138.7 (120.1, 159.3) 46 (8, 63) 42 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
St. Bernard Parish Urban No 154.5 (131.8, 180.0) 21 (3, 61) 35 falling falling trend -3.2 (-13.3, -0.9)
Sabine Parish Rural No 152.4 (125.2, 184.3) 24 (2, 63) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Richland Parish Urban No 140.4 (113.8, 172.1) 43 (4, 64) 21 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Red River Parish Rural Yes 118.2 (80.6, 169.4) 63 (4, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Rapides Parish Urban No 127.3 (116.8, 138.5) 56 (31, 63) 114 falling falling trend -1.5 (-6.3, -1.0)
Pointe Coupee Parish Urban No 140.2 (115.4, 169.7) 44 (4, 64) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Plaquemines Parish Urban No 161.2 (131.8, 195.5) 11 (2, 62) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Ouachita Parish Urban No 147.8 (137.4, 158.8) 31 (11, 52) 157 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Orleans Parish Urban No 124.6 (118.4, 131.1) 58 (44, 63) 319 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -2.1)
Natchitoches Parish Rural No 146.3 (125.0, 170.5) 34 (5, 62) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Morehouse Parish Urban No 158.3 (133.3, 187.1) 14 (2, 60) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Madison Parish Rural No 178.2 (134.8, 232.2) 3 (1, 62) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Livingston Parish Urban No 138.3 (126.9, 150.3) 47 (17, 60) 114 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Lincoln Parish Rural No 144.3 (124.4, 166.6) 39 (6, 63) 41 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Lafayette Parish Urban No 134.3 (125.9, 143.2) 51 (28, 61) 196 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
LaFourche Parish Urban No 131.3 (118.9, 144.6) 53 (23, 63) 86 falling falling trend -6.0 (-15.5, -0.4)
La Salle Parish Rural No 153.7 (120.9, 193.9) 23 (2, 64) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Jefferson Parish Urban No 130.4 (124.7, 136.3) 54 (38, 61) 418 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.3, -1.3)
Jefferson Davis Parish Urban No 149.1 (126.6, 174.8) 26 (3, 63) 33 falling falling trend -4.7 (-9.3, -2.6)
Jackson Parish Rural No 167.4 (133.8, 207.9) 9 (1, 61) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Iberville Parish Urban No 146.5 (124.1, 172.2) 33 (4, 63) 32 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Iberia Parish Rural No 156.0 (139.6, 173.8) 18 (4, 51) 70 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Grant Parish Urban No 156.8 (127.3, 191.6) 16 (2, 63) 21 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Franklin Parish Rural No 160.2 (131.5, 193.9) 12 (2, 61) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Evangeline Parish Rural No 155.5 (131.9, 182.3) 20 (2, 61) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
East Feliciana Parish Urban No 132.4 (105.7, 164.9) 52 (6, 64) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
East Carroll Parish Rural No 266.9 (199.4, 351.7) 1 (1, 15) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
East Baton Rouge Parish Urban Yes 122.1 (116.2, 128.2) 61 (47, 64) 343 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.8, -1.5)
De Soto Parish Urban No 142.3 (118.9, 169.3) 41 (5, 63) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Concordia Parish Rural No 156.6 (126.0, 192.8) 17 (2, 63) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Claiborne Parish Rural No 149.0 (115.2, 190.9) 27 (2, 64) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Catahoula Parish Rural No 144.9 (105.1, 196.9) 38 (2, 64) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.6)
Cameron Parish Urban No 157.4 (105.7, 228.9) 15 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend 6.4 (-0.4, 31.7)
Caldwell Parish Rural No 139.1 (100.2, 189.5) 45 (2, 64) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Calcasieu Parish Urban No 136.3 (127.4, 145.7) 49 (24, 59) 182 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Caddo Parish Urban No 149.8 (141.5, 158.4) 25 (13, 45) 263 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.8, -0.7)
Bossier Parish Urban No 134.5 (123.2, 146.5) 50 (22, 62) 108 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Bienville Parish Rural No 155.8 (122.1, 197.0) 19 (2, 64) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Beauregard Parish Rural No 175.5 (151.7, 202.2) 6 (1, 43) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Avoyelles Parish Rural No 147.6 (127.3, 170.4) 32 (5, 62) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-8.5, -0.4)
Assumption Parish Urban No 148.3 (121.6, 179.7) 29 (3, 64) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Ascension Parish Urban No 123.2 (111.3, 136.0) 60 (35, 64) 82 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.0, -1.3)
Allen Parish Rural No 164.5 (133.9, 200.3) 10 (2, 61) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Acadia Parish Urban No 158.4 (140.7, 177.9) 13 (3, 51) 61 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/11/2024 11:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top