Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Louisiana No 140.6 (138.7, 142.6) N/A 4,303 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.4)
United States No 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) N/A 283,896 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Tensas Parish No 192.6 (136.8, 270.8) 3 (1, 63) 9 rising rising trend 26.0 (3.1, 53.9)
Vernon Parish No 186.1 (162.4, 212.3) 4 (1, 25) 46 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Catahoula Parish No 139.7 (101.8, 188.9) 39 (2, 64) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.5)
East Carroll Parish No 264.1 (200.0, 344.5) 1 (1, 11) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.3)
Caldwell Parish No 134.7 (97.6, 182.7) 49 (2, 64) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Morehouse Parish No 150.4 (125.6, 179.2) 21 (3, 63) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Red River Parish No 136.3 (97.4, 187.3) 45 (2, 64) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Avoyelles Parish No 147.2 (127.4, 169.6) 27 (4, 61) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Beauregard Parish No 169.4 (146.3, 195.2) 8 (2, 47) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
East Feliciana Parish No 141.4 (113.2, 175.4) 36 (3, 64) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Union Parish No 177.6 (148.4, 211.4) 5 (1, 49) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Claiborne Parish No 136.2 (104.1, 176.1) 46 (3, 64) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
LaFourche Parish No 144.3 (131.3, 158.4) 31 (9, 58) 93 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Madison Parish No 198.7 (153.3, 254.0) 2 (1, 54) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
St. Landry Parish No 170.0 (154.6, 186.7) 7 (2, 30) 94 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Bienville Parish No 147.3 (116.2, 185.5) 26 (2, 64) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Concordia Parish No 173.3 (142.0, 210.0) 6 (1, 56) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Jackson Parish No 133.3 (104.2, 169.1) 53 (4, 64) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Ouachita Parish No 154.7 (143.9, 166.3) 13 (6, 42) 156 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Sabine Parish No 132.5 (108.0, 161.3) 54 (7, 64) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Terrebonne Parish No 157.9 (144.7, 172.0) 11 (4, 41) 109 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Washington Parish No 156.1 (137.2, 177.2) 12 (3, 54) 53 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Caddo Parish No 153.0 (144.7, 161.6) 16 (8, 39) 271 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
La Salle Parish No 135.2 (105.2, 172.2) 47 (3, 64) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Natchitoches Parish No 164.5 (142.5, 189.2) 9 (2, 49) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
St. Mary Parish No 151.9 (133.8, 172.0) 18 (4, 57) 53 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Evangeline Parish No 152.9 (130.1, 178.7) 17 (3, 60) 33 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Lincoln Parish No 146.4 (126.2, 169.0) 28 (4, 61) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
St. John the Baptist Parish No 138.7 (118.6, 161.3) 41 (6, 63) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Vermilion Parish No 139.8 (123.8, 157.5) 38 (9, 62) 57 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
West Carroll Parish No 134.3 (101.9, 175.7) 50 (3, 64) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Winn Parish No 154.0 (120.2, 195.5) 15 (2, 64) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Assumption Parish No 137.2 (112.2, 166.7) 43 (5, 64) 22 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Iberia Parish No 147.9 (132.0, 165.3) 25 (6, 57) 67 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
St. Charles Parish No 143.9 (125.2, 164.6) 32 (6, 62) 45 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
St. Helena Parish No 127.3 (94.4, 169.8) 57 (3, 64) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.7)
Franklin Parish No 128.4 (103.2, 158.5) 56 (6, 64) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Plaquemines Parish No 144.8 (117.3, 177.0) 29 (3, 64) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Webster Parish No 151.0 (131.8, 172.7) 19 (4, 59) 48 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Acadia Parish No 151.0 (134.5, 169.2) 20 (4, 56) 63 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Calcasieu Parish No 154.4 (144.7, 164.7) 14 (7, 42) 196 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Rapides Parish No 137.6 (126.7, 149.3) 42 (17, 60) 124 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
St. Martin Parish No 140.5 (123.1, 159.9) 37 (8, 62) 49 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Grant Parish No 148.3 (119.6, 182.3) 23 (2, 64) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Iberville Parish No 143.8 (122.0, 168.6) 34 (5, 63) 32 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Tangipahoa Parish No 148.0 (136.2, 160.7) 24 (8, 51) 121 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Jefferson Parish No 136.5 (130.7, 142.6) 44 (28, 55) 432 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
St. Tammany Parish No 128.9 (121.4, 136.9) 55 (35, 62) 228 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Bossier Parish No 133.4 (121.9, 145.6) 52 (21, 62) 103 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
De Soto Parish No 149.5 (125.6, 177.1) 22 (3, 62) 29 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Pointe Coupee Parish Yes 119.3 (97.1, 145.8) 63 (18, 64) 22 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
St. James Parish No 144.4 (118.5, 174.8) 30 (3, 64) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Allen Parish No 142.0 (115.6, 173.0) 35 (4, 64) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Ascension Parish No 126.4 (114.1, 139.6) 60 (28, 64) 82 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Richland Parish No 126.4 (101.5, 156.2) 59 (9, 64) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Livingston Parish No 134.0 (122.6, 146.2) 51 (19, 62) 106 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
West Baton Rouge Parish Yes 119.7 (96.9, 146.6) 62 (14, 64) 20 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Lafayette Parish No 134.8 (126.2, 143.9) 48 (24, 60) 191 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
West Feliciana Parish No 139.7 (104.6, 184.3) 40 (2, 64) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Cameron Parish Yes 106.1 (67.6, 160.6) 64 (5, 64) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.1)
Orleans Parish No 127.3 (121.0, 133.8) 58 (39, 62) 324 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
St. Bernard Parish No 143.9 (122.4, 168.0) 33 (5, 63) 34 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.3, -0.6)
East Baton Rouge Parish No 125.8 (119.7, 132.0) 61 (42, 63) 342 falling falling trend -6.0 (-11.6, -0.1)
Jefferson Davis Parish No 159.0 (135.5, 185.8) 10 (2, 58) 34 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.8, -2.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/28/2024 3:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top