Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana 6, 7 N/A No 160.6 (158.8, 162.5) N/A 6,194 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
United States 6 N/A No 151.3 (151.1, 151.5) N/A 463,400 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
East Carroll Parish 6, 7 Rural No 174.8 (118.5, 256.5) 31 (1, 64) 6
*
*
Tensas Parish 6, 7 Rural No 204.1 (135.0, 306.3) 4 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.7)
Madison Parish 6, 7 Rural No 173.5 (129.6, 231.7) 35 (1, 64) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.2)
Cameron Parish 6, 7 Urban No 149.9 (112.3, 197.9) 53 (2, 64) 11 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -1.1)
Red River Parish 6, 7 Rural No 179.5 (138.9, 231.3) 23 (1, 64) 14
*
*
Caldwell Parish 6, 7 Rural No 147.8 (116.9, 185.4) 57 (7, 64) 16
*
*
St. Helena Parish 6, 7 Urban No 180.4 (142.4, 228.4) 21 (1, 64) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.2)
West Feliciana Parish 6, 7 Urban No 141.5 (113.6, 175.6) 59 (15, 64) 18
*
*
Catahoula Parish 6, 7 Rural No 216.4 (174.2, 267.1) 1 (1, 51) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.9)
Bienville Parish 6, 7 Rural No 175.2 (142.5, 214.6) 30 (1, 63) 22
*
*
Claiborne Parish 6, 7 Rural No 178.3 (143.7, 220.9) 24 (1, 63) 22
*
*
St. James Parish 6, 7 Urban No 141.4 (115.5, 172.2) 60 (14, 64) 22
*
*
West Carroll Parish 6, 7 Rural No 190.7 (156.7, 231.0) 11 (1, 60) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.2)
La Salle Parish 6, 7 Rural No 173.6 (145.3, 206.2) 34 (2, 63) 27
*
*
West Baton Rouge Parish 6, 7 Urban No 140.2 (117.4, 166.5) 61 (24, 64) 28 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Winn Parish 6, 7 Rural No 198.4 (165.7, 236.7) 7 (1, 56) 28
*
*
East Feliciana Parish 6, 7 Urban No 157.2 (131.8, 187.1) 49 (7, 64) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.5)
Concordia Parish 6, 7 Rural No 182.8 (152.8, 217.6) 18 (1, 60) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Richland Parish 6, 7 Urban No 163.3 (137.9, 192.8) 43 (5, 63) 31 falling falling trend -2.2 (-12.5, -1.3)
Plaquemines Parish 6, 7 Urban No 172.9 (146.5, 203.1) 38 (2, 62) 31
*
*
Assumption Parish 6, 7 Urban No 149.0 (126.4, 175.1) 55 (15, 64) 32 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Jackson Parish 6, 7 Rural No 202.6 (172.0, 237.8) 5 (1, 48) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Pointe Coupee Parish 6, 7 Urban No 159.0 (135.5, 186.4) 47 (9, 63) 35
*
*
Franklin Parish 6, 7 Rural No 176.7 (150.6, 206.5) 27 (2, 60) 35
*
*
Morehouse Parish 6, 7 Urban No 165.7 (141.3, 193.8) 42 (5, 63) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-10.5, -0.5)
De Soto Parish 6, 7 Urban No 153.0 (131.3, 177.7) 50 (13, 64) 37 stable stable trend -1.7 (-11.8, 0.1)
St. John the Baptist Parish 6, 7 Urban No 174.1 (149.4, 202.4) 33 (2, 61) 38
*
*
Iberville Parish 6, 7 Urban No 177.4 (153.4, 204.8) 25 (2, 59) 41
*
*
Allen Parish 6, 7 Rural No 209.8 (181.6, 241.4) 2 (1, 40) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Grant Parish 6, 7 Urban No 191.0 (165.8, 219.2) 10 (1, 53) 43 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Union Parish 6, 7 Urban No 188.3 (164.1, 215.8) 13 (1, 51) 49 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Lincoln Parish 6, 7 Rural No 149.1 (130.6, 169.8) 54 (22, 64) 49
*
*
Sabine Parish 6, 7 Rural No 198.0 (173.2, 225.9) 8 (1, 45) 51 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Evangeline Parish 6, 7 Rural No 175.7 (154.7, 199.2) 28 (2, 57) 53
*
*
Natchitoches Parish 6, 7 Rural No 185.7 (163.2, 210.8) 16 (2, 53) 53 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
St. Bernard Parish 6, 7 Urban No 187.1 (165.2, 211.2) 14 (1, 51) 58
*
*
Jefferson Davis Parish 6, 7 Urban No 189.1 (168.5, 211.7) 12 (1, 47) 64
*
*
St. Charles Parish 6, 7 Urban No 173.3 (155.0, 193.2) 36 (6, 57) 70
*
*
Avoyelles Parish 6, 7 Rural No 179.6 (160.9, 200.1) 22 (4, 54) 71
*
*
Beauregard Parish 6, 7 Rural No 195.3 (175.3, 217.1) 9 (1, 40) 72 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
St. Mary Parish 6, 7 Rural No 173.2 (155.6, 192.5) 37 (6, 56) 75 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Webster Parish 6, 7 Rural No 206.2 (185.0, 229.5) 3 (1, 32) 76 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Vernon Parish 6, 7 Rural No 200.5 (180.8, 221.8) 6 (1, 36) 78 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
St. Martin Parish 6, 7 Urban No 174.2 (157.1, 192.8) 32 (6, 56) 79
*
*
Washington Parish 6, 7 Rural No 182.4 (164.7, 201.7) 19 (3, 50) 83 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Iberia Parish 6, 7 Rural No 177.2 (161.6, 193.9) 26 (6, 51) 102 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Vermilion Parish 6, 7 Urban No 172.9 (158.1, 188.9) 39 (9, 53) 105
*
*
Acadia Parish 6, 7 Urban No 187.0 (171.3, 203.8) 15 (3, 45) 109
*
*
St. Landry Parish 6, 7 Rural No 183.6 (168.8, 199.6) 17 (4, 45) 119 falling falling trend -0.7 (-7.5, -0.1)
Ascension Parish 6, 7 Urban No 138.3 (127.5, 149.7) 62 (47, 64) 129
*
*
LaFourche Parish 6, 7 Urban No 161.8 (150.8, 173.4) 44 (21, 58) 168 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Rapides Parish 6, 7 Urban No 148.0 (138.0, 158.6) 56 (38, 62) 171 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Terrebonne Parish 6, 7 Urban No 182.2 (170.2, 194.9) 20 (6, 43) 180
*
*
Bossier Parish 6, 7 Urban No 159.7 (149.4, 170.6) 46 (27, 58) 184 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Orleans Parish 6, 7 Urban Yes 120.3 (112.5, 128.4) 64 (60, 64) 190 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.5)
Tangipahoa Parish 6, 7 Urban No 175.5 (164.4, 187.2) 29 (10, 48) 196 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Livingston Parish 6, 7 Urban No 160.2 (150.8, 170.1) 45 (28, 58) 227 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Ouachita Parish 6, 7 Urban No 172.3 (162.3, 182.9) 40 (14, 48) 230 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Calcasieu Parish 6, 7 Urban No 158.1 (150.0, 166.6) 48 (31, 58) 294 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Caddo Parish 6, 7 Urban No 167.0 (158.3, 176.1) 41 (20, 51) 301 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Lafayette Parish 6, 7 Urban No 152.6 (144.8, 160.7) 51 (37, 60) 305 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.7)
East Baton Rouge Parish 6, 7 Urban No 133.4 (127.4, 139.7) 63 (55, 64) 387 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
St. Tammany Parish 6, 7 Urban No 147.2 (140.9, 153.8) 58 (45, 61) 433 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Jefferson Parish 6, 7 Urban No 152.4 (146.8, 158.2) 52 (41, 59) 600 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/17/2024 5:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

7 Data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) for this state and the user is cautioned against drawing conclusions from such data. This was based on the NCHS Policy.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top