Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Louisiana *** 61.2 (60.2, 62.2) N/A 3,120 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.7, -1.5)
United States *** 48.4 (48.3, 48.5) N/A 171,025 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.7, -2.0)
East Carroll Parish *** 100.2 (70.2, 139.5) 1 (1, 53) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.0)
Catahoula Parish *** 82.6 (59.5, 112.6) 7 (1, 62) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Concordia Parish *** 85.4 (68.4, 105.8) 6 (1, 46) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Iberville Parish *** 75.5 (63.3, 89.5) 15 (2, 50) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Morehouse Parish *** 92.5 (76.2, 111.3) 2 (1, 31) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Bienville Parish *** 75.3 (55.5, 100.3) 16 (1, 62) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Red River Parish *** 90.2 (65.3, 122.7) 3 (1, 57) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Beauregard Parish *** 65.5 (54.5, 78.3) 36 (7, 59) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Claiborne Parish *** 66.1 (49.9, 86.6) 34 (2, 63) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Vernon Parish *** 73.0 (61.6, 85.8) 17 (3, 51) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
LaFourche Parish *** 71.3 (64.2, 79.1) 21 (6, 44) 78 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
St. Helena Parish *** 58.0 (39.8, 82.8) 48 (3, 63) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Caldwell Parish *** 87.1 (63.2, 117.7) 5 (1, 60) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
St. Landry Parish *** 80.0 (71.6, 89.2) 10 (2, 33) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Grant Parish *** 68.0 (53.6, 85.4) 29 (3, 62) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Avoyelles Parish *** 70.8 (59.7, 83.4) 24 (3, 54) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Caddo Parish *** 71.3 (66.7, 76.2) 22 (10, 39) 193 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Natchitoches Parish *** 80.3 (67.4, 95.1) 9 (1, 44) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
St. Mary Parish *** 81.4 (71.0, 93.0) 8 (1, 36) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Union Parish *** 79.7 (63.7, 98.8) 11 (1, 52) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Acadia Parish *** 76.1 (66.7, 86.4) 14 (3, 42) 52 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Evangeline Parish *** 70.1 (58.2, 83.9) 25 (4, 56) 26 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Jefferson Davis Parish *** 67.4 (54.9, 82.2) 32 (4, 61) 22 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Sabine Parish *** 69.7 (55.4, 86.9) 26 (2, 61) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Terrebonne Parish *** 68.9 (62.4, 76.0) 27 (10, 47) 86 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Calcasieu Parish *** 68.0 (63.0, 73.4) 30 (13, 45) 147 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Franklin Parish *** 62.4 (48.2, 79.7) 42 (4, 63) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Ouachita Parish *** 65.7 (60.1, 71.7) 35 (16, 49) 107 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
St. John the Baptist Parish *** 61.1 (51.7, 72.0) 47 (12, 61) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
De Soto Parish *** 78.5 (64.8, 94.5) 13 (1, 48) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Iberia Parish *** 72.5 (63.8, 82.0) 19 (4, 46) 57 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Washington Parish *** 78.6 (67.8, 90.9) 12 (1, 41) 42 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
East Baton Rouge Parish *** 55.8 (52.6, 59.2) 51 (39, 58) 247 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Rapides Parish *** 62.5 (56.5, 69.0) 41 (19, 55) 87 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
St. Bernard Parish *** 64.1 (54.0, 75.5) 38 (9, 61) 30 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Winn Parish *** 64.7 (47.5, 86.5) 37 (3, 63) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
East Feliciana Parish *** 61.8 (48.3, 78.6) 45 (5, 63) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Jackson Parish *** 72.2 (54.1, 94.8) 20 (1, 62) 12 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.4)
Madison Parish *** 88.3 (65.3, 117.3) 4 (1, 57) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
St. Martin Parish *** 67.3 (58.1, 77.7) 33 (7, 55) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Tangipahoa Parish *** 61.9 (56.0, 68.3) 43 (22, 55) 86 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Plaquemines Parish *** 61.8 (48.7, 77.6) 44 (7, 63) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Richland Parish *** 63.6 (48.8, 81.6) 40 (4, 63) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
St. James Parish *** 61.7 (47.7, 78.8) 46 (5, 63) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Assumption Parish *** 64.1 (50.1, 80.9) 39 (4, 63) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Bossier Parish *** 53.9 (48.2, 60.1) 54 (37, 62) 69 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
Jefferson Parish *** 52.9 (50.0, 56.0) 57 (45, 61) 266 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Lincoln Parish *** 53.3 (43.4, 64.9) 56 (25, 63) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
St. Charles Parish *** 48.0 (40.5, 56.7) 61 (41, 63) 31 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Livingston Parish *** 57.1 (51.8, 63.0) 49 (32, 60) 85 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Pointe Coupee Parish *** 55.5 (42.7, 71.3) 52 (12, 63) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
St. Tammany Parish *** 48.5 (44.9, 52.3) 60 (51, 63) 146 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
West Baton Rouge Parish *** 67.8 (55.0, 82.9) 31 (4, 60) 21 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
West Feliciana Parish *** 68.1 (52.8, 87.5) 28 (2, 62) 14 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Lafayette Parish *** 51.0 (47.1, 55.2) 59 (45, 63) 131 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.8)
Allen Parish *** 53.7 (41.8, 68.2) 55 (14, 63) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
La Salle Parish *** 56.6 (41.1, 76.6) 50 (7, 63) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)
Ascension Parish *** 46.2 (41.1, 51.8) 62 (51, 63) 60 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -1.9)
Vermilion Parish *** 52.9 (45.3, 61.5) 58 (33, 63) 37 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Orleans Parish *** 55.4 (52.2, 58.7) 53 (40, 59) 241 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.7, -2.7)
Webster Parish *** 72.6 (61.4, 85.5) 18 (3, 52) 32 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.4)
Tensas Parish *** 42.3 (24.1, 75.6) 63 (12, 63) 3 falling falling trend -7.6 (-11.5, -3.5)
West Carroll Parish *** 71.2 (50.5, 98.2) 23 (1, 63) 8 falling falling trend -30.2 (-50.6, -1.4)
Cameron Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/26/2022 2:18 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of estimates:
Cameron

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top