Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name

Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana N/A Yes 56.6 (55.6, 57.5) N/A 2,850 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -1.7)
United States N/A Yes 45.0 (44.9, 45.1) N/A 161,722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Winn Parish Rural Yes 77.9 (58.6, 102.2) 9 (1, 56) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
West Feliciana Parish Urban Yes 53.7 (40.2, 71.4) 49 (10, 64) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.5)
West Carroll Parish Rural Yes 59.7 (39.5, 87.4) 36 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.1)
West Baton Rouge Parish Urban Yes 57.3 (45.6, 71.2) 43 (10, 64) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Webster Parish Rural Yes 74.3 (62.2, 88.3) 12 (1, 44) 30 falling falling trend -2.2 (-8.5, -1.1)
Washington Parish Rural Yes 71.0 (60.6, 82.7) 20 (2, 45) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Vernon Parish Rural Yes 69.5 (58.4, 82.0) 22 (2, 48) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.4)
Vermilion Parish Urban Yes 59.0 (50.5, 68.7) 38 (13, 59) 37 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.6)
Union Parish Urban Yes 79.7 (63.7, 99.0) 8 (1, 45) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Terrebonne Parish Urban Yes 66.4 (59.8, 73.5) 24 (9, 43) 82 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Tensas Parish Rural Yes 85.3 (51.5, 137.4) 1 (1, 64) 5 rising rising trend 15.5 (3.5, 54.6)
Tangipahoa Parish Urban Yes 58.7 (52.9, 64.9) 40 (20, 55) 82 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
St. Tammany Parish Urban Yes 43.2 (39.9, 46.9) 63 (54, 64) 132 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
St. Mary Parish Rural Yes 72.7 (62.8, 83.9) 16 (2, 41) 43 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
St. Martin Parish Urban Yes 65.0 (55.8, 75.3) 29 (7, 53) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
St. Landry Parish Rural Yes 80.7 (72.1, 90.1) 5 (1, 23) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
St. John the Baptist Parish Urban Yes 42.7 (34.6, 52.3) 64 (41, 64) 21 falling falling trend -11.7 (-23.0, -5.5)
St. James Parish Urban Yes 55.8 (42.8, 72.0) 46 (8, 64) 14 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
St. Helena Parish Urban Yes 43.6 (29.2, 63.9) 62 (17, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
St. Charles Parish Urban Yes 51.3 (43.2, 60.6) 53 (25, 64) 31 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.0)
St. Bernard Parish Urban Yes 60.6 (50.7, 72.1) 33 (10, 61) 28 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Sabine Parish Rural Yes 69.6 (54.5, 87.9) 21 (1, 59) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Richland Parish Urban Yes 52.4 (38.9, 69.2) 52 (10, 64) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Red River Parish Rural Yes 73.4 (50.1, 105.2) 13 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.9)
Rapides Parish Urban Yes 57.8 (52.1, 64.1) 41 (22, 56) 80 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Pointe Coupee Parish Urban Yes 58.8 (45.3, 75.6) 39 (5, 64) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Plaquemines Parish Urban Yes 56.9 (44.4, 72.2) 44 (9, 64) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Ouachita Parish Urban Yes 59.7 (54.5, 65.4) 35 (19, 52) 100 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Orleans Parish Urban Yes 52.8 (49.6, 56.2) 51 (37, 59) 220 falling falling trend -3.0 (-7.5, -2.6)
Natchitoches Parish Rural Yes 80.7 (67.5, 95.8) 4 (1, 37) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Morehouse Parish Urban Yes 71.3 (57.3, 87.8) 19 (1, 54) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Madison Parish Rural Yes 73.1 (51.0, 102.0) 14 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Livingston Parish Urban Yes 51.2 (46.2, 56.6) 54 (35, 62) 80 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Lincoln Parish Rural Yes 54.7 (44.5, 66.5) 48 (16, 64) 22 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Lafayette Parish Urban Yes 49.5 (45.6, 53.7) 56 (42, 62) 128 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.8)
LaFourche Parish Urban Yes 57.5 (51.1, 64.5) 42 (21, 58) 65 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.1)
La Salle Parish Rural Yes 66.3 (49.2, 87.8) 25 (1, 64) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Jefferson Parish Urban Yes 48.7 (45.8, 51.7) 57 (45, 62) 241 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.7)
Jefferson Davis Parish Urban Yes 59.8 (48.2, 73.5) 34 (8, 63) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Jackson Parish Rural Yes 76.1 (57.3, 99.6) 10 (1, 58) 12 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Iberville Parish Urban Yes 72.1 (59.8, 86.4) 18 (1, 49) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Iberia Parish Rural Yes 65.3 (57.0, 74.4) 28 (7, 49) 51 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Grant Parish Urban Yes 68.5 (54.2, 85.8) 23 (1, 60) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.6)
Franklin Parish Rural Yes 72.9 (56.9, 92.4) 15 (1, 56) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Evangeline Parish Rural Yes 79.8 (66.8, 94.8) 7 (1, 36) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
East Feliciana Parish Urban Yes 48.0 (36.8, 62.4) 58 (21, 64) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
East Carroll Parish Rural Yes 81.5 (54.8, 117.5) 2 (1, 63) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.7)
East Baton Rouge Parish Urban Yes 49.9 (46.9, 53.1) 55 (42, 62) 218 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
De Soto Parish Urban Yes 59.7 (47.4, 74.5) 37 (7, 63) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Concordia Parish Rural Yes 81.2 (62.8, 103.5) 3 (1, 49) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Claiborne Parish Rural Yes 72.4 (53.8, 96.0) 17 (1, 61) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Catahoula Parish Rural Yes 63.4 (43.3, 90.9) 30 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Cameron Parish Urban Yes 47.1 (27.4, 78.7) 60 (3, 64) 4 stable stable trend 6.3 (-3.9, 41.3)
Caldwell Parish Rural Yes 54.8 (36.1, 80.6) 47 (3, 64) 6
*
*
Calcasieu Parish Urban Yes 56.0 (51.5, 60.8) 45 (28, 56) 124 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Caddo Parish Urban Yes 65.3 (60.7, 70.1) 27 (13, 41) 168 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Bossier Parish Urban Yes 48.0 (42.7, 53.7) 59 (40, 64) 64 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Bienville Parish Rural Yes 74.5 (54.4, 100.1) 11 (1, 62) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Beauregard Parish Rural Yes 66.0 (54.9, 78.9) 26 (3, 56) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Avoyelles Parish Rural Yes 53.7 (44.0, 65.0) 50 (18, 64) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Assumption Parish Urban Yes 61.6 (47.8, 78.5) 32 (3, 63) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Ascension Parish Urban Yes 46.5 (41.4, 52.1) 61 (44, 64) 63 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.9)
Allen Parish Rural Yes 61.9 (48.2, 78.6) 31 (3, 63) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Acadia Parish Urban Yes 80.0 (70.0, 91.1) 6 (1, 28) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/10/2024 6:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top