Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana No 205.6 (203.0, 208.3) N/A 5,042 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -2.0)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
East Carroll Parish No 310.2 (226.0, 414.1) 1 (1, 59) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Red River Parish No 303.8 (236.6, 385.0) 2 (1, 46) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Morehouse Parish No 276.0 (238.6, 318.0) 3 (1, 33) 42 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Catahoula Parish No 269.3 (210.9, 339.3) 4 (1, 58) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Vernon Parish No 261.8 (230.9, 295.5) 5 (1, 35) 54 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Avoyelles Parish No 258.2 (229.3, 290.0) 6 (1, 35) 60 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Jackson Parish No 253.1 (210.9, 301.8) 7 (1, 54) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Madison Parish No 252.1 (197.9, 317.0) 8 (1, 61) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
St. Landry Parish No 251.0 (229.8, 273.6) 9 (2, 34) 111 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Iberville Parish No 250.2 (217.8, 286.3) 10 (1, 45) 46 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Allen Parish No 249.8 (212.9, 291.3) 11 (1, 51) 34 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Beauregard Parish No 249.0 (218.8, 282.2) 12 (1, 44) 52 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Webster Parish No 248.5 (220.7, 279.1) 13 (2, 43) 61 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
West Carroll Parish No 246.1 (195.0, 307.2) 14 (1, 62) 17 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.2)
Concordia Parish No 244.3 (204.0, 290.5) 15 (1, 57) 27 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Washington Parish No 240.6 (214.9, 268.6) 16 (2, 44) 68 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Acadia Parish No 239.8 (215.7, 266.0) 17 (3, 45) 77 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Jefferson Davis Parish No 238.7 (207.2, 273.7) 18 (2, 52) 43 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Ouachita Parish No 237.5 (221.8, 254.0) 19 (6, 37) 180 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Bienville Parish No 237.3 (192.0, 290.9) 20 (1, 62) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Richland Parish No 235.0 (195.5, 280.2) 21 (1, 61) 27 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.1)
St. Helena Parish No 234.2 (183.6, 295.7) 22 (1, 63) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
St. Mary Parish No 233.6 (208.9, 260.4) 23 (4, 48) 69 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Natchitoches Parish No 230.2 (201.4, 262.1) 24 (3, 54) 48 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Terrebonne Parish No 226.5 (208.9, 245.2) 25 (8, 47) 131 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Iberia Parish No 225.5 (203.5, 249.2) 26 (7, 52) 83 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Winn Parish No 225.0 (182.7, 274.7) 27 (2, 63) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Evangeline Parish No 225.0 (195.0, 258.4) 28 (4, 60) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Tangipahoa Parish No 220.1 (203.5, 237.6) 29 (11, 49) 145 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Franklin Parish No 219.6 (181.8, 263.2) 30 (3, 63) 25 rising rising trend 6.0 (1.6, 10.6)
LaFourche Parish No 218.0 (200.3, 236.8) 31 (13, 52) 118 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
East Feliciana Parish No 216.5 (181.4, 256.9) 32 (4, 63) 29 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
St. Martin Parish No 215.6 (191.4, 242.0) 33 (8, 59) 62 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Assumption Parish No 213.4 (178.8, 253.1) 34 (4, 63) 29 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Union Parish No 212.7 (180.2, 249.9) 35 (4, 63) 33 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.4)
Sabine Parish No 212.2 (181.7, 246.9) 36 (6, 62) 36 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Plaquemines Parish No 211.2 (174.2, 253.5) 37 (4, 63) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Caddo Parish No 211.0 (199.9, 222.6) 38 (23, 50) 286 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Grant Parish No 210.7 (174.9, 251.8) 39 (4, 63) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Calcasieu Parish No 210.7 (198.0, 223.9) 40 (20, 52) 220 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
St. Bernard Parish No 207.8 (179.4, 239.3) 41 (10, 62) 43 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.9, -2.6)
De Soto Parish No 207.5 (177.1, 241.8) 42 (7, 63) 35 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Rapides Parish No 204.3 (189.2, 220.2) 43 (23, 58) 143 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
St. John the Baptist Parish No 202.9 (175.8, 233.0) 44 (13, 63) 44 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Caldwell Parish No 200.8 (152.6, 260.1) 45 (3, 63) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9)
Claiborne Parish No 200.6 (163.9, 243.9) 46 (8, 63) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Pointe Coupee Parish No 200.2 (168.6, 236.7) 47 (9, 63) 30 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
La Salle Parish No 197.9 (157.1, 246.4) 48 (6, 63) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Vermilion Parish No 196.0 (174.5, 219.5) 49 (21, 63) 63 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.4)
St. James Parish No 195.6 (161.0, 235.8) 50 (8, 63) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Lincoln Parish No 195.3 (169.1, 224.5) 51 (18, 63) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
St. Charles Parish No 192.8 (168.3, 219.9) 52 (20, 63) 50 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
East Baton Rouge Parish No 191.2 (182.5, 200.3) 53 (40, 60) 388 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
West Feliciana Parish No 190.0 (152.9, 234.1) 54 (8, 63) 21 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.6)
Livingston Parish No 189.8 (174.7, 205.9) 55 (33, 63) 128 falling falling trend -8.7 (-15.5, -1.3)
Jefferson Parish No 189.2 (181.4, 197.3) 56 (41, 61) 468 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.8)
Bossier Parish No 189.2 (173.9, 205.4) 57 (33, 63) 118 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.8)
Orleans Parish No 182.7 (173.9, 191.8) 58 (45, 63) 359 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.7, -2.9)
Lafayette Parish No 182.3 (170.7, 194.3) 59 (43, 63) 202 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
St. Tammany Parish No 181.2 (171.2, 191.7) 60 (45, 63) 265 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)
West Baton Rouge Parish No 179.7 (147.5, 216.7) 61 (18, 64) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.7)
Ascension Parish No 168.9 (152.5, 186.5) 62 (47, 63) 90 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.2)
Tensas Parish No 158.7 (105.8, 235.8) 63 (6, 64) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.4)
Cameron Parish Yes 102.0 (64.7, 155.3) 64 (61, 64) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 10:36 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top