Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by County

Colon & Rectum, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana Yes 15.6 (15.2, 16.1) N/A 860 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.6, -2.1)
United States Yes 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) N/A 52,152 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Red River Parish Yes 29.8 (17.0, 49.3) 1 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Catahoula Parish Yes 28.3 (16.0, 46.7) 2 (1, 55) 3 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.0)
Concordia Parish Yes 26.1 (17.7, 37.5) 3 (1, 44) 6
*
*
St. Martin Parish Yes 23.1 (17.9, 29.4) 4 (1, 36) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Bienville Parish Yes 23.0 (13.7, 36.5) 5 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.5)
Acadia Parish Yes 23.0 (18.2, 28.7) 6 (1, 35) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Vernon Parish Yes 22.8 (17.0, 29.9) 7 (1, 44) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.3)
Jefferson Davis Parish Yes 22.7 (16.5, 30.7) 8 (1, 47) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Avoyelles Parish Yes 22.7 (17.2, 29.5) 9 (1, 41) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Grant Parish Yes 22.6 (15.0, 32.8) 10 (1, 53) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.8)
West Carroll Parish Yes 22.2 (12.8, 36.8) 11 (1, 57) 3
*
*
St. Landry Parish Yes 21.8 (17.7, 26.6) 12 (1, 34) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
La Salle Parish Yes 20.5 (12.2, 32.5) 13 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
St. Mary Parish Yes 20.2 (15.3, 26.2) 14 (2, 48) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
LaFourche Parish Yes 20.1 (16.6, 24.1) 15 (3, 38) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Natchitoches Parish Yes 20.0 (14.6, 26.8) 16 (1, 52) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Rapides Parish Yes 19.7 (16.7, 23.2) 17 (4, 37) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Evangeline Parish Yes 19.3 (13.7, 26.6) 18 (1, 54) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Caddo Parish Yes 19.2 (17.0, 21.6) 19 (7, 34) 59 stable stable trend 8.8 (-1.4, 20.1)
Beauregard Parish Yes 18.7 (13.4, 25.5) 20 (2, 55) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
West Feliciana Parish Yes 18.6 (10.6, 30.8) 21 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Jackson Parish Yes 18.3 (11.2, 28.8) 22 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Iberville Parish Yes 17.8 (12.5, 24.8) 23 (2, 56) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
St. James Parish Yes 17.6 (11.4, 26.4) 24 (2, 57) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Claiborne Parish Yes 17.4 (10.7, 27.4) 25 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Washington Parish Yes 17.1 (12.6, 22.8) 26 (5, 55) 10 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Winn Parish Yes 17.1 (9.6, 28.5) 27 (1, 57) 3
*
*
Iberia Parish Yes 17.0 (13.2, 21.7) 28 (6, 54) 14 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Webster Parish Yes 16.7 (12.2, 22.5) 29 (5, 56) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Calcasieu Parish Yes 16.5 (14.2, 19.1) 30 (14, 48) 39 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Ouachita Parish Yes 16.4 (13.8, 19.4) 31 (12, 49) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
St. John the Baptist Parish Yes 16.2 (11.3, 22.5) 32 (5, 57) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Terrebonne Parish Yes 15.9 (12.9, 19.5) 33 (12, 53) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
St. Bernard Parish Yes 15.3 (10.2, 21.9) 34 (5, 57) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Plaquemines Parish Yes 15.1 (9.1, 23.6) 35 (3, 57) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.3)
Vermilion Parish Yes 15.1 (11.4, 19.6) 36 (12, 56) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Tangipahoa Parish Yes 14.8 (12.1, 17.9) 37 (17, 55) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Orleans Parish Yes 14.6 (13.1, 16.4) 38 (24, 51) 66 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.1, -3.4)
East Feliciana Parish Yes 14.6 (8.6, 23.6) 39 (3, 57) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5)
Allen Parish Yes 14.2 (8.7, 21.9) 40 (5, 57) 4
*
*
Assumption Parish Yes 14.1 (8.7, 21.9) 41 (5, 57) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
East Baton Rouge Parish Yes 14.1 (12.6, 15.7) 42 (27, 52) 65 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.5)
Lincoln Parish Yes 13.9 (9.5, 19.8) 43 (9, 57) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Franklin Parish Yes 13.8 (7.9, 22.7) 44 (5, 57) 4
*
*
Union Parish Yes 13.8 (8.5, 21.7) 45 (6, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Pointe Coupee Parish Yes 13.7 (8.3, 21.6) 46 (6, 57) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.7)
St. Charles Parish Yes 13.6 (9.5, 18.9) 47 (12, 57) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Lafayette Parish Yes 13.5 (11.5, 15.7) 48 (27, 55) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Jefferson Parish Yes 13.1 (11.8, 14.6) 49 (33, 55) 73 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -2.0)
Morehouse Parish Yes 12.9 (7.8, 20.3) 50 (8, 57) 4
*
*
De Soto Parish Yes 12.8 (7.9, 19.8) 51 (10, 57) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.5)
Livingston Parish Yes 12.8 (10.3, 15.8) 52 (25, 57) 19 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.3)
Richland Parish Yes 12.1 (6.8, 20.2) 53 (8, 57) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.8)
St. Tammany Parish Yes 12.1 (10.4, 14.0) 54 (35, 57) 38 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.0, -2.4)
Bossier Parish Yes 12.0 (9.5, 14.9) 55 (29, 57) 17 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.9)
Sabine Parish Yes 11.4 (7.0, 17.9) 56 (17, 57) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Ascension Parish Yes 9.8 (7.4, 12.8) 57 (39, 57) 12 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.0)
Caldwell Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Carroll Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Helena Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tensas Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Baton Rouge Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/01/2023 6:16 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top