Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 74.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana N/A Yes 15.2 (14.7, 15.6) N/A 842 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -2.0)
United States N/A Yes 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
West Feliciana Parish Urban Yes 16.3 (9.2, 27.5) 30 (1, 53) 3
*
*
La Salle Parish Rural Yes 19.6 (11.3, 31.8) 11 (1, 53) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Richland Parish Urban Yes 12.9 (7.5, 21.2) 48 (4, 53) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.0)
Bienville Parish Rural Yes 19.4 (11.4, 31.7) 12 (1, 53) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.1)
Assumption Parish Urban Yes 13.7 (8.2, 21.9) 44 (3, 53) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.2)
Jackson Parish Rural Yes 19.2 (11.7, 30.3) 14 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Winn Parish Rural Yes 22.3 (13.6, 34.9) 5 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Allen Parish Rural Yes 17.1 (10.6, 26.2) 24 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Plaquemines Parish Urban Yes 16.5 (10.2, 25.2) 27 (1, 53) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.5, -0.2)
Sabine Parish Rural Yes 13.5 (8.3, 21.1) 45 (5, 53) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Concordia Parish Rural Yes 21.4 (13.4, 32.6) 7 (1, 53) 5
*
*
De Soto Parish Urban Yes 14.2 (9.0, 21.5) 42 (4, 53) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.6)
Pointe Coupee Parish Urban Yes 14.9 (9.4, 23.1) 36 (2, 53) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.3)
Morehouse Parish Urban Yes 14.7 (9.3, 22.3) 38 (3, 53) 5
*
*
St. James Parish Urban Yes 18.1 (11.6, 27.3) 19 (1, 53) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Franklin Parish Rural Yes 21.5 (13.9, 32.1) 6 (1, 52) 5
*
*
Claiborne Parish Rural Yes 26.0 (17.0, 38.7) 1 (1, 45) 6 stable stable trend 26.0 (-1.3, 50.8)
Grant Parish Urban Yes 20.7 (13.6, 30.4) 9 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.7)
Union Parish Urban Yes 19.0 (12.3, 28.3) 15 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.2)
St. Bernard Parish Urban Yes 14.5 (9.7, 20.9) 39 (5, 53) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -1.2)
Iberville Parish Urban Yes 15.8 (10.8, 22.7) 33 (3, 53) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Beauregard Parish Rural Yes 16.4 (11.3, 23.1) 28 (2, 53) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 1.0)
Jefferson Davis Parish Urban Yes 18.0 (12.5, 25.2) 21 (1, 52) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 1.0)
Evangeline Parish Rural Yes 18.2 (12.7, 25.4) 18 (1, 52) 7 falling falling trend -8.7 (-31.0, -1.3)
St. John the Baptist Parish Urban Yes 16.1 (11.2, 22.6) 32 (3, 53) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.4)
St. Charles Parish Urban Yes 13.2 (9.2, 18.4) 46 (11, 53) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.2, 0.0)
Lincoln Parish Rural Yes 16.8 (11.9, 23.1) 26 (2, 53) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Vernon Parish Rural Yes 16.4 (11.7, 22.5) 29 (3, 53) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 3.2)
Washington Parish Rural Yes 13.9 (9.9, 19.1) 43 (8, 53) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Natchitoches Parish Rural Yes 21.4 (15.6, 28.8) 8 (1, 46) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Avoyelles Parish Rural Yes 19.3 (14.3, 25.7) 13 (1, 48) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
St. Mary Parish Rural Yes 17.9 (13.3, 23.6) 22 (2, 51) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Webster Parish Rural Yes 22.3 (16.8, 29.2) 3 (1, 40) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Vermilion Parish Urban Yes 16.9 (12.9, 21.9) 25 (4, 51) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Ascension Parish Urban Yes 9.6 (7.4, 12.4) 53 (40, 53) 13 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.8, -2.1)
Acadia Parish Urban Yes 20.5 (15.9, 26.1) 10 (1, 42) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
St. Martin Parish Urban Yes 23.5 (18.2, 29.9) 2 (1, 30) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Iberia Parish Rural Yes 18.2 (14.2, 23.0) 17 (3, 47) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Bossier Parish Urban Yes 11.8 (9.4, 14.6) 51 (29, 53) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Livingston Parish Urban Yes 12.4 (10.0, 15.3) 49 (25, 53) 19 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.1)
Terrebonne Parish Urban Yes 15.6 (12.6, 19.1) 35 (10, 50) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-16.3, -1.0)
LaFourche Parish Urban Yes 17.8 (14.6, 21.6) 23 (4, 45) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.2)
St. Landry Parish Rural Yes 22.3 (18.2, 27.1) 4 (1, 29) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Tangipahoa Parish Urban Yes 16.2 (13.3, 19.5) 31 (9, 48) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.3)
Rapides Parish Urban Yes 18.0 (15.1, 21.4) 20 (5, 42) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Ouachita Parish Urban Yes 15.8 (13.3, 18.7) 34 (12, 48) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Calcasieu Parish Urban Yes 14.8 (12.6, 17.2) 37 (18, 50) 36 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Lafayette Parish Urban Yes 14.3 (12.3, 16.6) 40 (21, 50) 37 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
St. Tammany Parish Urban Yes 11.6 (9.9, 13.4) 52 (36, 53) 38 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.2, -2.4)
Caddo Parish Urban Yes 18.7 (16.5, 21.1) 16 (5, 33) 57 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
East Baton Rouge Parish Urban Yes 13.1 (11.6, 14.7) 47 (30, 51) 63 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
Orleans Parish Urban Yes 14.2 (12.7, 15.9) 41 (24, 49) 64 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.9, -3.3)
Jefferson Parish Urban Yes 12.3 (11.0, 13.8) 50 (35, 52) 70 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -1.9)
Caldwell Parish Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron Parish Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Catahoula Parish Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Carroll Parish Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Feliciana Parish Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison Parish Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River Parish Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Helena Parish Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tensas Parish Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Baton Rouge Parish Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Carroll Parish Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 8:53 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top