Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by County

Pancreas, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana *** 12.6 (12.1, 13.0) N/A 687 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
United States *** 11.1 (11.0, 11.1) N/A 43,836 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.3)
Beauregard Parish *** 7.6 (4.5, 12.3) 43 (18, 43) 4
*
*
St. Bernard Parish *** 9.9 (6.0, 15.2) 42 (6, 43) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Vermilion Parish *** 10.2 (7.2, 14.2) 41 (10, 43) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.2, 0.0)
Orleans Parish *** 10.8 (9.4, 12.3) 40 (20, 42) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Pointe Coupee Parish *** 10.9 (6.4, 17.9) 39 (3, 43) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.6)
West Baton Rouge Parish *** 11.0 (6.3, 18.0) 38 (3, 43) 3
*
*
Jefferson Parish *** 11.1 (9.8, 12.4) 37 (20, 42) 62 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
St. Mary Parish *** 11.1 (7.8, 15.5) 36 (6, 43) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Acadia Parish *** 11.3 (8.1, 15.5) 35 (6, 43) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Iberville Parish *** 11.5 (7.1, 17.6) 34 (3, 43) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.7)
East Baton Rouge Parish *** 11.7 (10.3, 13.2) 33 (15, 41) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Tangipahoa Parish *** 11.8 (9.4, 14.6) 32 (9, 42) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Lincoln Parish *** 11.8 (7.8, 17.2) 31 (3, 43) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Bossier Parish *** 11.8 (9.3, 14.7) 30 (8, 42) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2)
Livingston Parish *** 11.8 (9.4, 14.7) 29 (8, 42) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
St. Tammany Parish *** 12.0 (10.3, 13.9) 28 (12, 41) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Ascension Parish *** 12.2 (9.3, 15.6) 27 (6, 43) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.3)
LaFourche Parish *** 12.2 (9.5, 15.4) 26 (7, 42) 15 falling falling trend -28.1 (-43.5, -8.6)
Rapides Parish *** 12.4 (10.0, 15.1) 25 (7, 42) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.3)
Terrebonne Parish *** 12.5 (9.9, 15.7) 24 (6, 42) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2)
Avoyelles Parish *** 12.9 (8.7, 18.5) 23 (2, 43) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.2)
Washington Parish *** 13.2 (9.5, 18.1) 22 (2, 43) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
St. Martin Parish *** 13.3 (9.5, 18.2) 21 (2, 43) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3)
Lafayette Parish *** 13.5 (11.5, 15.8) 20 (6, 38) 32 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Iberia Parish *** 13.6 (10.2, 17.9) 19 (2, 42) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Jefferson Davis Parish *** 13.8 (9.0, 20.3) 18 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Caddo Parish *** 13.9 (12.1, 15.9) 17 (6, 34) 44 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.7)
St. John the Baptist Parish *** 13.9 (9.5, 19.8) 16 (1, 43) 7
*
*
Morehouse Parish *** 14.1 (8.9, 21.3) 15 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
St. Charles Parish *** 14.1 (9.9, 19.5) 14 (2, 43) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.6)
Natchitoches Parish *** 15.1 (10.4, 21.2) 13 (1, 42) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.8)
Webster Parish *** 15.1 (11.0, 20.6) 12 (1, 41) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.9)
Evangeline Parish *** 15.1 (10.2, 21.8) 11 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Ouachita Parish *** 15.7 (13.1, 18.6) 10 (2, 29) 27 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
St. Landry Parish *** 15.7 (12.4, 19.6) 9 (1, 36) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Jackson Parish *** 15.7 (9.4, 25.3) 8 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Assumption Parish *** 15.8 (9.9, 24.1) 7 (1, 43) 5
*
*
Union Parish *** 16.3 (10.1, 25.1) 6 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.8)
Calcasieu Parish *** 16.5 (14.2, 19.1) 5 (2, 22) 38 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.2)
Vernon Parish *** 16.9 (12.0, 23.2) 4 (1, 39) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.6)
De Soto Parish *** 17.1 (11.4, 24.8) 3 (1, 42) 6
*
*
Richland Parish *** 18.5 (11.6, 28.1) 2 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Allen Parish *** 24.0 (16.7, 33.6) 1 (1, 23) 7
*
*
Bienville Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Catahoula Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concordia Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Carroll Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Feliciana Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plaquemines Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Helena Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. James Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tensas Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Carroll Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Feliciana Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winn Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/18/2021 1:00 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top