Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Louisiana by County

Prostate, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana No 19.9 (19.1, 20.8) N/A 441 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.7)
United States No 18.8 (18.7, 18.9) N/A 31,337 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Orleans Parish No 23.7 (20.4, 27.2) 13 (5, 24) 42 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.7, -2.5)
East Baton Rouge Parish No 20.0 (17.2, 23.2) 22 (10, 31) 37 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.9, -2.7)
Jefferson Parish Yes 16.9 (14.5, 19.5) 29 (18, 36) 37 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.1, -3.0)
Caddo Parish No 21.1 (17.6, 25.1) 20 (7, 31) 26 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.6, -3.0)
St. Tammany Parish No 17.6 (14.4, 21.3) 28 (14, 36) 22 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.4, -2.4)
Ouachita Parish No 26.3 (21.1, 32.4) 7 (2, 24) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Lafayette Parish Yes 15.8 (12.4, 19.8) 32 (17, 37) 16 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.3, -2.5)
Calcasieu Parish Yes 16.0 (12.5, 20.0) 31 (16, 37) 15 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.5, -2.5)
Tangipahoa Parish No 27.2 (21.1, 34.3) 6 (2, 24) 15 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.8)
Rapides Parish No 19.2 (14.7, 24.8) 23 (7, 36) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.8)
St. Landry Parish No 22.8 (16.5, 30.7) 16 (3, 35) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Terrebonne Parish No 18.8 (13.6, 25.1) 26 (7, 37) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Livingston Parish Yes 15.6 (11.2, 21.1) 33 (13, 37) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.0)
Bossier Parish Yes 14.8 (10.7, 20.0) 35 (15, 37) 9 falling falling trend -5.7 (-7.2, -4.1)
Iberia Parish No 21.0 (14.6, 29.2) 21 (4, 37) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.3)
LaFourche Parish Yes 13.9 (9.5, 19.5) 37 (17, 37) 7 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.0)
Vermilion Parish No 21.8 (14.9, 30.7) 19 (3, 37) 7 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.3, -2.3)
Ascension Parish Yes 14.6 (9.8, 20.7) 36 (14, 37) 7
*
*
Washington Parish No 22.9 (15.4, 33.0) 15 (2, 37) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -1.9)
St. John the Baptist Parish No 31.0 (20.5, 44.8) 3 (1, 33) 6
*
*
Avoyelles Parish No 26.2 (17.0, 38.5) 8 (1, 36) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.1)
Lincoln Parish No 25.9 (16.8, 38.2) 9 (1, 36) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.1)
Acadia Parish No 19.0 (12.2, 28.0) 25 (4, 37) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.1)
St. Mary Parish Yes 16.6 (10.6, 25.0) 30 (7, 37) 5 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.6, -2.1)
Natchitoches Parish No 23.0 (14.5, 34.9) 14 (2, 37) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.4, -1.7)
Jackson Parish No 44.7 (27.9, 68.5) 1 (1, 20) 4
*
*
Jefferson Davis Parish No 24.4 (15.2, 37.3) 11 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
St. Charles Parish No 19.1 (11.5, 29.5) 24 (3, 37) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -0.8)
Vernon Parish No 22.1 (13.5, 33.8) 18 (2, 37) 4
*
*
Webster Parish No 17.8 (11.0, 27.7) 27 (5, 37) 4 falling falling trend -5.5 (-6.8, -4.3)
Iberville Parish No 22.6 (13.5, 35.7) 17 (1, 37) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.8, -1.5)
Sabine Parish No 24.7 (14.9, 39.2) 10 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.3, 0.1)
St. Martin Parish Yes 15.4 (9.2, 24.1) 34 (9, 37) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.5)
East Feliciana Parish No 30.3 (17.7, 48.9) 5 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Union Parish No 24.0 (14.1, 38.9) 12 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend 25.5 (-39.9, 161.9)
Claiborne Parish No 31.9 (18.1, 52.9) 2 (1, 37) 3 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Concordia Parish No 30.7 (17.4, 50.3) 4 (1, 37) 3 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -1.6)
Allen Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Assumption Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beauregard Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bienville Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Catahoula Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Soto Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Carroll Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Evangeline Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morehouse Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plaquemines Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pointe Coupee Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Bernard Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Helena Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. James Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tensas Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Baton Rouge Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Carroll Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Feliciana Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winn Parish ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2024 3:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top