Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Michigan Yes 50.9 (50.3, 51.5) N/A 5,843 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
United States Yes 47.3 (47.2, 47.4) N/A 168,038 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Baraga County Yes 62.9 (41.8, 92.6) 15 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.4, 5.1)
Roscommon County Yes 81.1 (64.9, 100.9) 2 (1, 31) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Arenac County Yes 63.2 (47.1, 84.1) 13 (1, 80) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Chippewa County Yes 55.9 (45.8, 67.8) 31 (4, 76) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Alger County Yes 48.9 (31.5, 74.7) 60 (2, 82) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Ingham County Yes 52.9 (49.0, 57.1) 42 (21, 65) 146 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Ontonagon County Yes 35.5 (18.7, 71.2) 82 (6, 82) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
Alcona County Yes 63.4 (43.9, 91.7) 12 (1, 82) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Sanilac County Yes 69.3 (58.5, 81.8) 7 (1, 50) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Missaukee County Yes 51.1 (37.0, 69.6) 51 (3, 82) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Mason County Yes 51.1 (40.3, 64.3) 52 (6, 82) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Osceola County Yes 64.1 (50.6, 80.4) 10 (1, 71) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Schoolcraft County Yes 51.7 (33.6, 79.1) 49 (1, 82) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Gratiot County Yes 64.5 (53.9, 76.7) 8 (2, 61) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.1)
Kalkaska County Yes 63.0 (48.3, 81.5) 14 (1, 77) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Newaygo County Yes 62.7 (53.1, 73.7) 16 (2, 62) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Otsego County Yes 53.9 (41.8, 68.7) 36 (3, 82) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Bay County Yes 62.0 (55.5, 69.1) 18 (5, 49) 76 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Oscoda County Yes 64.5 (41.3, 97.6) 9 (1, 82) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Calhoun County Yes 62.4 (56.6, 68.7) 17 (4, 44) 95 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Gladwin County Yes 70.6 (56.7, 87.3) 4 (1, 60) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Hillsdale County Yes 57.6 (48.3, 68.4) 29 (4, 71) 32 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Huron County Yes 45.1 (35.8, 56.6) 71 (17, 82) 19 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Isabella County Yes 53.4 (45.3, 62.6) 41 (7, 75) 34 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Montmorency County Yes 91.3 (62.8, 129.7) 1 (1, 59) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Antrim County Yes 51.0 (38.9, 66.4) 55 (5, 82) 15 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Crawford County Yes 52.6 (37.6, 73.0) 46 (2, 82) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Marquette County Yes 48.7 (41.5, 57.0) 63 (17, 80) 37 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Mecosta County Yes 61.1 (50.3, 73.6) 19 (2, 68) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Muskegon County Yes 57.3 (52.5, 62.5) 30 (9, 56) 115 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Tuscola County Yes 58.5 (50.1, 68.2) 26 (4, 68) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Benzie County Yes 52.8 (38.4, 71.4) 45 (2, 82) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Eaton County Yes 46.4 (41.0, 52.3) 70 (30, 80) 61 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Genesee County Yes 59.9 (56.7, 63.3) 20 (9, 40) 286 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Shiawassee County Yes 52.9 (45.9, 60.7) 43 (10, 73) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Wexford County Yes 49.9 (40.1, 61.6) 57 (9, 81) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Alpena County Yes 59.2 (48.0, 72.8) 23 (2, 74) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Branch County Yes 58.7 (49.1, 69.8) 25 (3, 70) 29 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Cass County Yes 52.4 (44.4, 61.7) 47 (10, 77) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Charlevoix County Yes 51.6 (39.5, 66.7) 50 (5, 82) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Cheboygan County Yes 51.0 (39.5, 65.5) 54 (5, 82) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Clare County Yes 69.6 (57.3, 84.2) 6 (1, 54) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Iosco County Yes 64.1 (50.6, 80.6) 11 (1, 70) 20 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Iron County Yes 70.2 (48.5, 99.7) 5 (1, 80) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Lenawee County Yes 53.9 (47.7, 60.8) 35 (12, 69) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Midland County Yes 47.9 (41.7, 55.0) 67 (23, 79) 46 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Allegan County Yes 48.7 (43.5, 54.5) 64 (28, 76) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Houghton County Yes 53.7 (42.8, 66.8) 38 (5, 81) 19 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Ionia County Yes 51.1 (43.9, 59.2) 53 (14, 77) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Jackson County Yes 59.9 (54.8, 65.3) 21 (7, 48) 114 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Kalamazoo County Yes 49.8 (45.9, 53.9) 58 (31, 71) 131 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Macomb County Yes 51.9 (49.9, 54.0) 48 (33, 61) 538 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Menominee County Yes 47.4 (36.2, 61.6) 69 (8, 82) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Montcalm County Yes 55.9 (48.4, 64.4) 32 (7, 71) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Ottawa County Yes 39.7 (36.5, 43.3) 78 (65, 82) 116 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
St. Clair County Yes 53.7 (49.0, 58.8) 37 (16, 67) 110 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Barry County Yes 50.0 (42.5, 58.6) 56 (14, 79) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Berrien County Yes 54.3 (49.4, 59.6) 34 (15, 66) 100 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Saginaw County Yes 53.7 (49.2, 58.5) 39 (17, 65) 119 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
St. Joseph County Yes 58.0 (49.8, 67.1) 28 (4, 68) 40 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Gogebic County Yes 48.2 (34.6, 66.7) 65 (4, 82) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Monroe County Yes 53.5 (48.5, 58.9) 40 (16, 68) 96 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Ogemaw County Yes 58.8 (45.6, 75.4) 24 (2, 80) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Kent County Yes 42.8 (40.5, 45.1) 73 (60, 79) 296 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Lapeer County Yes 48.7 (42.9, 55.2) 62 (23, 77) 58 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Manistee County Yes 52.8 (41.4, 67.1) 44 (5, 82) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Oceana County Yes 47.9 (37.2, 61.0) 68 (9, 82) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Van Buren County Yes 48.8 (42.2, 56.2) 61 (20, 79) 45 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Livingston County Yes 40.7 (37.0, 44.8) 75 (60, 82) 100 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Wayne County Yes 58.1 (56.5, 59.7) 27 (15, 39) 1,127 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Emmet County Yes 48.0 (38.5, 59.5) 66 (11, 82) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
Grand Traverse County Yes 40.1 (34.8, 46.0) 76 (55, 82) 47 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Leelanau County Yes 38.1 (26.8, 53.4) 81 (20, 82) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Washtenaw County Yes 40.0 (37.0, 43.1) 77 (65, 82) 143 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
Dickinson County Yes 42.1 (32.0, 54.9) 74 (18, 82) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Clinton County Yes 38.5 (33.0, 44.9) 80 (59, 82) 37 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Oakland County Yes 39.2 (37.8, 40.8) 79 (70, 82) 587 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -1.9)
Presque Isle County Yes 49.0 (32.3, 72.6) 59 (2, 82) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -0.1)
Lake County Yes 72.1 (52.1, 98.6) 3 (1, 76) 12 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
Delta County Yes 44.7 (35.5, 55.9) 72 (17, 82) 20 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Mackinac County Yes 54.8 (37.0, 79.8) 33 (1, 82) 8 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -1.2)
Luce County Yes 59.6 (35.7, 95.4) 22 (1, 82) 4
*
*
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/02/2023 10:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top