Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A Yes 15.6 (15.2, 16.1) N/A 914 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.4)
United States N/A Yes 14.4 (14.4, 14.5) N/A 29,194 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Barry County Urban Yes 15.3 (10.1, 22.3) 30 (3, 47) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.3)
Bay County Urban Yes 18.0 (13.4, 23.6) 14 (2, 44) 10 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Berrien County Urban Yes 15.4 (11.9, 19.6) 29 (6, 46) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Calhoun County Urban Yes 20.1 (15.9, 25.1) 7 (1, 34) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Cass County Urban Yes 15.6 (9.8, 23.7) 28 (2, 47) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.7)
Clinton County Urban Yes 8.0 (4.8, 12.5) 47 (31, 47) 4 falling falling trend -14.6 (-38.7, -3.8)
Eaton County Urban Yes 12.8 (9.1, 17.5) 43 (11, 47) 8 falling falling trend -5.8 (-13.0, -2.6)
Genesee County Urban Yes 18.0 (15.7, 20.6) 13 (5, 32) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Grand Traverse County Urban Yes 13.6 (9.7, 18.8) 38 (8, 47) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.8)
Ingham County Urban Yes 15.7 (13.0, 18.8) 27 (7, 43) 24 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Ionia County Urban Yes 11.5 (7.4, 17.1) 46 (10, 47) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.6)
Jackson County Urban Yes 14.6 (11.3, 18.6) 32 (8, 46) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.1)
Kalamazoo County Urban Yes 14.7 (12.0, 17.7) 31 (10, 45) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Kent County Urban Yes 14.1 (12.5, 15.8) 34 (19, 44) 56 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Lapeer County Urban Yes 11.8 (7.9, 17.0) 45 (12, 47) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.9)
Livingston County Urban Yes 13.4 (10.5, 16.9) 41 (13, 47) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Macomb County Urban Yes 16.5 (14.9, 18.1) 22 (10, 34) 87 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Midland County Urban Yes 16.2 (11.6, 22.1) 23 (3, 46) 8 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Monroe County Urban Yes 15.9 (12.4, 20.1) 25 (5, 45) 14 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.3)
Montcalm County Urban Yes 14.5 (9.8, 20.7) 33 (4, 47) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.1)
Muskegon County Urban Yes 17.9 (14.4, 22.0) 15 (3, 40) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -1.0)
Oakland County Urban Yes 12.3 (11.2, 13.4) 44 (31, 46) 96 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5)
Ottawa County Urban Yes 12.9 (10.6, 15.5) 42 (19, 47) 22 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Saginaw County Urban Yes 17.2 (13.8, 21.2) 18 (4, 42) 18 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
St. Clair County Urban Yes 16.8 (13.2, 21.0) 21 (4, 43) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.1)
Washtenaw County Urban Yes 13.6 (11.5, 16.1) 39 (17, 46) 29 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Wayne County Urban Yes 17.7 (16.6, 18.9) 16 (8, 26) 188 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Allegan County Rural Yes 16.1 (12.2, 20.9) 24 (5, 45) 11 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Branch County Rural Yes 17.0 (10.6, 25.7) 20 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Chippewa County Rural Yes 17.6 (10.6, 27.5) 17 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Clare County Rural Yes 20.7 (11.8, 33.6) 6 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Delta County Rural Yes 19.0 (11.2, 30.0) 12 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Gladwin County Rural Yes 25.8 (14.7, 41.9) 1 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Gratiot County Rural Yes 19.6 (12.6, 29.2) 10 (1, 46) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Hillsdale County Rural Yes 17.2 (10.8, 26.0) 19 (1, 47) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.2, -0.1)
Isabella County Rural Yes 22.8 (15.8, 31.7) 4 (1, 42) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Lenawee County Rural Yes 15.9 (11.5, 21.2) 26 (4, 46) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Marquette County Rural Yes 13.5 (8.6, 20.2) 40 (5, 47) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Mason County Rural Yes 23.2 (13.5, 37.1) 3 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Mecosta County Rural Yes 21.3 (13.1, 32.6) 5 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Newaygo County Rural Yes 19.7 (12.8, 28.7) 9 (1, 46) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Sanilac County Rural Yes 25.5 (16.9, 36.8) 2 (1, 40) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.6)
Shiawassee County Rural Yes 13.7 (8.9, 20.1) 37 (5, 47) 5
*
*
St. Joseph County Rural Yes 13.9 (8.9, 20.7) 35 (5, 47) 5 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.0, -0.1)
Tuscola County Rural Yes 19.7 (13.2, 28.4) 8 (1, 45) 6 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.0, -0.1)
Van Buren County Rural Yes 13.7 (9.2, 19.7) 36 (6, 47) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.2)
Wexford County Rural Yes 19.5 (11.5, 30.8) 11 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.4)
Alcona County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alpena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/15/2024 2:34 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top