Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A No 531.9 (528.6, 535.3) N/A 20,155 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States N/A No 490.4 (489.9, 491.0) N/A 573,761 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Wayne County Urban No 547.0 (538.6, 555.5) 45 (34, 58) 3,352 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.8)
Keweenaw County Rural No 426.4 (285.4, 619.4) 82 (3, 83) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Benzie County Urban No 454.8 (395.2, 520.8) 80 (40, 83) 44 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Mackinac County Rural No 508.7 (430.6, 597.0) 68 (8, 83) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Livingston County Urban No 493.7 (470.8, 517.4) 72 (54, 79) 366 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Oakland County Urban No 464.5 (455.7, 473.3) 77 (70, 82) 2,215 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.5)
Antrim County Rural No 497.7 (442.3, 558.2) 71 (21, 82) 62 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Gogebic County Rural No 455.9 (391.6, 528.0) 79 (33, 83) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Leelanau County Urban No 391.1 (345.1, 441.8) 83 (75, 83) 56 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Washtenaw County Urban No 451.7 (434.2, 469.7) 81 (71, 82) 516 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Genesee County Urban No 569.0 (552.2, 586.2) 33 (19, 50) 894 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.2, -1.0)
Lake County Rural No 641.3 (554.4, 738.0) 10 (1, 69) 43 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Clinton County Urban No 464.6 (429.9, 501.3) 76 (59, 83) 136 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Grand Traverse County Urban No 471.3 (441.2, 502.8) 74 (59, 82) 191 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Arenac County Rural No 556.3 (482.4, 638.3) 39 (4, 80) 43 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Dickinson County Rural No 469.1 (416.4, 526.7) 75 (36, 83) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Iron County Rural No 571.0 (490.8, 660.8) 31 (2, 81) 40 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Ogemaw County Rural No 621.3 (555.9, 692.4) 14 (1, 64) 69 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Saginaw County Urban No 525.4 (502.8, 548.8) 60 (34, 72) 415 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Cheboygan County Rural No 517.7 (465.1, 574.7) 64 (16, 81) 74 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Kalamazoo County Urban No 523.6 (501.9, 546.1) 62 (37, 73) 448 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Manistee County Rural No 581.9 (523.8, 644.7) 29 (4, 71) 77 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Monroe County Urban No 558.5 (531.9, 585.9) 37 (16, 63) 344 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Newaygo County Rural No 539.2 (494.6, 586.6) 53 (13, 75) 112 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.5)
Otsego County Rural No 524.6 (465.2, 589.6) 61 (11, 82) 58 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Presque Isle County Rural No 479.6 (412.1, 555.4) 73 (21, 83) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
St. Clair County Urban No 565.9 (540.0, 592.6) 34 (16, 61) 373 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
St. Joseph County Rural No 537.8 (495.9, 582.4) 55 (16, 76) 125 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Alger County Rural No 502.2 (409.7, 609.3) 70 (6, 83) 22 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Barry County Urban No 509.1 (469.0, 551.7) 67 (29, 81) 124 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Berrien County Urban No 545.7 (520.5, 571.9) 46 (24, 67) 359 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Charlevoix County Rural No 529.9 (474.5, 589.9) 57 (12, 81) 70 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Kent County Urban No 512.4 (498.2, 526.8) 66 (50, 73) 1,028 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
Luce County Rural No 658.8 (528.2, 812.4) 7 (1, 79) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Macomb County Urban No 545.3 (534.0, 556.8) 49 (33, 60) 1,819 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
Allegan County Rural No 542.4 (511.2, 575.1) 51 (21, 72) 235 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Bay County Urban No 563.5 (532.5, 595.8) 35 (15, 65) 255 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Delta County Rural No 548.7 (501.6, 599.2) 44 (11, 75) 104 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Iosco County Rural No 641.8 (583.0, 704.9) 9 (1, 48) 94 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Jackson County Urban No 586.0 (559.1, 614.0) 25 (11, 52) 366 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Lapeer County Urban No 559.7 (524.5, 596.6) 36 (13, 69) 199 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Lenawee County Rural No 532.6 (500.7, 566.1) 56 (25, 75) 214 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Marquette County Rural No 512.8 (474.3, 553.6) 65 (26, 80) 137 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Mason County Rural No 584.1 (528.5, 644.1) 26 (5, 70) 84 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Montcalm County Urban No 603.5 (560.7, 648.8) 18 (4, 55) 151 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Shiawassee County Rural No 549.5 (510.2, 591.0) 42 (14, 72) 150 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Van Buren County Rural No 551.8 (513.7, 592.0) 41 (15, 71) 163 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.4)
Branch County Rural No 549.4 (500.6, 601.5) 43 (11, 75) 96 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Calhoun County Urban No 612.7 (582.3, 644.2) 15 (5, 36) 313 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Cass County Urban No 583.5 (539.1, 630.5) 27 (6, 67) 133 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Gladwin County Rural No 604.7 (546.4, 667.5) 17 (3, 65) 83 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Houghton County Rural No 582.2 (524.9, 644.1) 28 (4, 72) 78 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Ionia County Urban No 557.2 (512.0, 605.2) 38 (10, 74) 118 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Ontonagon County Rural No 545.6 (449.5, 657.2) 48 (3, 83) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Osceola County Rural No 598.8 (531.9, 671.8) 21 (2, 69) 60 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Ottawa County Urban No 462.2 (443.2, 481.7) 78 (67, 82) 456 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Sanilac County Rural No 573.4 (525.4, 624.6) 30 (7, 71) 109 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Clare County Rural No 688.0 (628.1, 752.1) 2 (1, 24) 102 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Eaton County Urban No 527.2 (496.8, 559.0) 59 (27, 74) 231 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Huron County Rural No 545.6 (495.9, 599.0) 47 (10, 77) 92 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Isabella County Rural No 591.6 (541.3, 645.2) 23 (5, 65) 106 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Muskegon County Urban No 596.2 (569.6, 623.7) 22 (9, 43) 392 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Oceana County Rural No 529.0 (470.8, 592.4) 58 (12, 81) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Tuscola County Rural No 570.2 (527.4, 615.6) 32 (8, 68) 135 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Emmet County Rural No 520.8 (470.9, 574.6) 63 (16, 81) 83 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.4)
Missaukee County Rural No 543.6 (465.9, 630.8) 50 (4, 82) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.4)
Wexford County Rural No 538.7 (484.8, 596.8) 54 (11, 79) 76 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Mecosta County Rural No 606.8 (553.1, 664.3) 16 (3, 61) 97 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Menominee County Rural No 555.4 (497.2, 618.7) 40 (7, 78) 68 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Montmorency County Rural No 673.2 (576.8, 781.3) 5 (1, 64) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Chippewa County Rural No 652.6 (594.2, 715.2) 8 (1, 43) 94 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Gratiot County Rural No 586.2 (533.2, 643.0) 24 (5, 69) 92 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Hillsdale County Rural No 626.3 (576.5, 679.4) 13 (2, 46) 121 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Oscoda County Rural No 667.9 (560.7, 789.8) 6 (1, 70) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Baraga County Rural No 687.5 (571.6, 820.0) 3 (1, 70) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Crawford County Rural No 673.3 (589.7, 765.6) 4 (1, 48) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Roscommon County Rural No 602.1 (544.7, 664.1) 20 (3, 68) 89 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Schoolcraft County Rural No 634.9 (532.4, 751.6) 12 (1, 76) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
Ingham County Urban No 541.0 (518.6, 564.2) 52 (28, 68) 456 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.9)
Alcona County Rural No 635.2 (550.8, 729.1) 11 (1, 69) 45 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 5.9)
Alpena County Rural No 603.3 (547.3, 663.5) 19 (3, 66) 88 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 6.6)
Midland County Urban No 502.3 (469.2, 537.2) 69 (38, 81) 175 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.6, 5.9)
Kalkaska County Urban No 751.1 (660.3, 850.6) 1 (1, 19) 54 stable stable trend 4.6 (-0.5, 12.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/13/2024 7:06 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top