Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan No 539.1 (535.7, 542.5) N/A 19,989 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
United States No 501.7 (501.1, 502.3) N/A 569,776 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Wexford County No 561.1 (505.4, 621.3) 46 (6, 76) 76 falling falling trend -5.7 (-9.2, -2.0)
Wayne County No 566.7 (558.1, 575.5) 38 (25, 51) 3,407 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Kalamazoo County No 505.8 (484.4, 527.9) 65 (51, 77) 433 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Keweenaw County No 400.3 (267.1, 582.8) 82 (7, 83) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Leelanau County No 390.0 (343.2, 441.7) 83 (76, 83) 53 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Oakland County No 470.3 (461.3, 479.4) 79 (69, 81) 2,169 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Benzie County No 437.2 (378.7, 502.2) 81 (54, 83) 42 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Genesee County No 571.8 (554.9, 589.1) 36 (18, 54) 891 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Livingston County No 499.2 (475.6, 523.8) 69 (53, 79) 351 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Mackinac County No 547.7 (465.9, 640.0) 52 (2, 82) 33 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Antrim County No 484.1 (430.3, 542.9) 75 (27, 83) 61 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Washtenaw County No 471.6 (453.2, 490.6) 78 (65, 82) 512 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Arenac County No 535.6 (464.6, 614.6) 58 (4, 82) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Lake County No 670.4 (583.4, 767.0) 3 (1, 60) 46 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Luce County No 582.4 (462.5, 724.2) 26 (1, 82) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Charlevoix County No 480.3 (427.3, 538.1) 76 (35, 83) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Clinton County No 489.7 (453.4, 528.1) 72 (48, 82) 138 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Gogebic County No 524.2 (453.8, 602.5) 62 (6, 82) 42 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Grand Traverse County No 474.2 (443.3, 506.5) 77 (58, 82) 183 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Iosco County No 571.9 (517.0, 631.1) 35 (4, 73) 84 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Ogemaw County No 655.1 (588.7, 727.1) 4 (1, 53) 74 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Saginaw County No 533.9 (511.0, 557.5) 61 (34, 70) 420 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Alger County No 487.9 (401.3, 587.9) 74 (10, 83) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Iron County No 555.8 (477.6, 643.5) 49 (2, 82) 39 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Barry County No 505.3 (465.2, 547.9) 66 (32, 81) 121 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Berrien County No 549.4 (523.9, 575.8) 51 (21, 66) 358 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Cheboygan County No 540.9 (487.2, 599.0) 57 (9, 79) 76 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Dickinson County No 497.3 (442.2, 557.4) 70 (23, 82) 62 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Kent County No 500.3 (486.2, 514.7) 68 (57, 76) 992 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -1.0)
Monroe County No 562.5 (535.2, 590.8) 44 (14, 62) 329 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Newaygo County No 557.5 (511.4, 606.6) 48 (8, 74) 111 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
St. Clair County No 578.2 (551.8, 605.5) 30 (11, 57) 371 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
St. Joseph County No 567.3 (524.2, 613.0) 37 (7, 69) 132 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Allegan County No 544.4 (512.5, 577.7) 54 (21, 71) 227 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Emmet County No 559.2 (506.8, 615.6) 47 (6, 75) 87 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Ionia County No 563.1 (517.5, 611.7) 42 (8, 72) 117 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Macomb County No 563.0 (551.4, 574.8) 43 (25, 54) 1,836 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.8)
Manistee County No 634.0 (572.7, 700.2) 9 (1, 56) 81 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Marquette County No 492.0 (454.3, 532.0) 71 (43, 82) 131 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Mason County No 552.1 (497.9, 610.7) 50 (6, 78) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Presque Isle County No 517.3 (446.8, 596.0) 64 (9, 82) 41 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Sanilac County No 600.4 (550.9, 653.2) 17 (2, 63) 111 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Shiawassee County No 574.5 (534.3, 617.0) 32 (7, 66) 155 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Bay County No 574.5 (543.0, 607.3) 33 (11, 63) 256 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Calhoun County No 592.2 (562.4, 623.1) 23 (6, 53) 305 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Delta County No 579.7 (530.2, 632.6) 29 (4, 67) 105 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Houghton County No 598.2 (539.4, 661.7) 19 (2, 69) 78 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Montcalm County No 582.0 (539.3, 627.0) 27 (5, 64) 142 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Osceola County No 605.4 (539.1, 677.7) 15 (1, 70) 62 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Otsego County No 534.4 (473.5, 601.0) 60 (8, 81) 57 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Ottawa County No 454.9 (435.6, 474.9) 80 (70, 82) 426 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Van Buren County No 577.1 (537.7, 618.6) 31 (7, 65) 166 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Alcona County No 609.6 (529.6, 698.6) 14 (1, 74) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Alpena County No 625.0 (567.1, 687.1) 11 (1, 58) 88 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Crawford County No 564.8 (490.3, 647.5) 40 (3, 80) 42 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Eaton County No 535.6 (504.6, 568.0) 59 (24, 74) 229 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Gladwin County No 642.3 (581.9, 707.2) 6 (1, 52) 86 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Isabella County No 542.4 (495.9, 592.1) 56 (12, 79) 104 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Jackson County No 612.9 (585.0, 641.9) 12 (4, 39) 372 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Lapeer County No 580.0 (543.5, 618.2) 28 (7, 62) 198 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Lenawee County No 564.4 (531.0, 599.3) 41 (11, 65) 219 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Oceana County No 562.2 (501.4, 628.4) 45 (5, 79) 64 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Huron County No 542.7 (492.9, 596.1) 55 (11, 78) 90 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Montmorency County No 640.5 (547.3, 745.2) 7 (1, 70) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Muskegon County No 592.4 (565.6, 620.2) 22 (8, 53) 379 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Oscoda County No 638.3 (536.4, 754.1) 8 (1, 77) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Tuscola County No 566.4 (523.5, 611.9) 39 (8, 70) 132 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Branch County No 589.6 (538.1, 644.6) 24 (3, 66) 99 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Chippewa County No 600.4 (544.4, 660.5) 18 (2, 66) 86 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Clare County No 712.4 (651.2, 777.7) 1 (1, 16) 104 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Mecosta County No 572.9 (521.8, 627.7) 34 (4, 72) 95 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Missaukee County No 503.2 (428.8, 586.9) 67 (10, 83) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Ontonagon County No 602.0 (498.0, 721.9) 16 (1, 81) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Hillsdale County No 610.8 (561.5, 663.2) 13 (2, 57) 117 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Menominee County No 545.5 (487.3, 608.8) 53 (7, 80) 66 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Baraga County No 588.4 (483.5, 709.4) 25 (1, 82) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Gratiot County No 596.5 (542.5, 654.5) 21 (3, 66) 92 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Schoolcraft County No 629.2 (528.6, 743.7) 10 (1, 78) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Kalkaska County No 670.6 (585.9, 764.1) 2 (1, 55) 48 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Roscommon County No 654.9 (596.4, 717.8) 5 (1, 46) 99 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Ingham County No 520.7 (498.8, 543.4) 63 (42, 73) 442 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Cass County No 596.9 (551.5, 645.0) 20 (3, 61) 133 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
Midland County No 489.7 (456.5, 524.6) 73 (48, 82) 165 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.2, 6.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2022 8:47 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top