Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan No 918.5 (911.9, 925.1) N/A 15,085 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States No 855.4 (854.2, 856.5) N/A 431,628 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Clare County No 1,186.8 (1,072.1, 1,310.4) 1 (1, 24) 80 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Kalkaska County No 1,133.2 (968.3, 1,317.9) 2 (1, 63) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Ogemaw County No 1,124.5 (998.0, 1,262.6) 3 (1, 49) 58 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Schoolcraft County No 1,117.0 (919.5, 1,344.1) 4 (1, 78) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Lake County No 1,114.5 (951.3, 1,297.5) 5 (1, 66) 35 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Ontonagon County No 1,108.0 (909.1, 1,337.2) 6 (1, 79) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Oscoda County No 1,103.7 (911.4, 1,324.3) 7 (1, 78) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Manistee County No 1,084.3 (968.8, 1,209.7) 8 (1, 55) 65 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Roscommon County No 1,070.5 (964.7, 1,184.6) 9 (1, 56) 77 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Hillsdale County No 1,060.1 (963.7, 1,163.5) 10 (1, 55) 90 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Gladwin County No 1,053.2 (942.7, 1,172.9) 11 (1, 65) 67 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Delta County No 1,040.4 (944.1, 1,143.7) 12 (2, 59) 88 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Cass County No 1,029.1 (940.4, 1,123.9) 13 (2, 61) 103 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 3.8)
Alpena County No 1,027.7 (919.9, 1,144.7) 14 (1, 66) 67 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Jackson County No 1,019.5 (965.6, 1,075.7) 15 (5, 49) 274 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Montmorency County No 1,019.4 (856.7, 1,203.7) 16 (1, 79) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Chippewa County No 1,017.9 (910.7, 1,134.3) 17 (1, 71) 66 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Van Buren County No 1,016.1 (937.7, 1,099.2) 18 (3, 58) 128 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Houghton County No 1,012.0 (901.4, 1,132.4) 19 (1, 69) 62 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Luce County No 1,006.6 (779.4, 1,279.2) 20 (1, 83) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Muskegon County No 997.6 (945.6, 1,051.8) 21 (7, 53) 282 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
Lapeer County No 997.4 (925.0, 1,074.0) 22 (4, 63) 146 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Branch County No 995.8 (896.3, 1,103.2) 23 (3, 71) 74 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Calhoun County No 990.5 (933.3, 1,050.4) 24 (7, 57) 228 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Gratiot County No 986.3 (883.8, 1,097.4) 25 (3, 75) 69 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Mecosta County No 984.0 (884.6, 1,091.6) 26 (3, 74) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Osceola County No 983.7 (860.2, 1,119.9) 27 (2, 79) 46 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Alcona County No 982.6 (842.1, 1,139.7) 28 (1, 80) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
St. Clair County No 980.9 (929.1, 1,034.7) 29 (9, 56) 275 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Crawford County No 980.0 (836.3, 1,141.3) 30 (1, 81) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Monroe County No 973.1 (919.3, 1,029.2) 31 (10, 61) 250 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Sanilac County No 973.1 (880.9, 1,072.3) 32 (4, 73) 83 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Montcalm County No 967.5 (885.3, 1,055.1) 33 (6, 73) 104 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Shiawassee County No 966.9 (888.6, 1,050.3) 34 (6, 71) 114 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Baraga County No 964.5 (770.9, 1,191.7) 35 (1, 83) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Macomb County No 964.4 (941.6, 987.7) 36 (20, 51) 1,386 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.6)
Emmet County No 958.7 (858.5, 1,067.3) 37 (4, 77) 68 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Wexford County No 956.5 (848.7, 1,074.3) 38 (4, 79) 58 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Oceana County No 955.1 (839.0, 1,082.8) 39 (3, 80) 50 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Cheboygan County No 954.5 (851.0, 1,067.2) 40 (4, 78) 63 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Lenawee County No 953.2 (888.8, 1,021.0) 41 (11, 70) 166 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Ionia County No 949.9 (860.1, 1,046.6) 42 (7, 77) 85 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Mason County No 948.9 (844.9, 1,062.0) 43 (5, 79) 61 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Bay County No 948.6 (889.1, 1,011.1) 44 (13, 68) 192 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Wayne County No 947.5 (930.6, 964.6) 45 (28, 54) 2,484 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Genesee County No 947.1 (914.6, 980.5) 46 (22, 59) 652 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Menominee County No 945.9 (833.6, 1,069.2) 47 (4, 80) 52 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Iosco County No 937.2 (839.3, 1,043.3) 48 (6, 78) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Tuscola County No 935.1 (853.4, 1,022.5) 49 (7, 77) 97 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Allegan County No 933.8 (870.8, 1,000.2) 50 (13, 72) 168 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Huron County No 932.0 (837.8, 1,033.9) 51 (6, 79) 72 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
St. Joseph County No 929.3 (847.6, 1,016.8) 52 (9, 78) 97 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Eaton County No 924.0 (863.3, 987.8) 53 (17, 75) 177 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Iron County No 919.5 (777.7, 1,079.6) 54 (3, 82) 31 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Mackinac County No 911.1 (760.6, 1,082.6) 55 (2, 82) 26 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.0)
Newaygo County No 910.4 (823.1, 1,004.5) 56 (11, 80) 81 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Berrien County No 903.1 (855.2, 953.1) 57 (28, 73) 270 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Isabella County No 900.6 (810.3, 998.2) 58 (11, 80) 74 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Presque Isle County No 900.3 (769.9, 1,046.2) 59 (5, 82) 34 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Otsego County No 899.8 (783.4, 1,028.5) 60 (6, 82) 44 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Livingston County No 889.5 (841.6, 939.5) 61 (31, 77) 267 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Saginaw County No 887.8 (844.3, 933.0) 62 (33, 75) 318 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Gogebic County No 883.0 (751.3, 1,030.8) 63 (6, 83) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Kent County No 873.2 (845.0, 902.1) 64 (49, 74) 747 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Dickinson County No 871.2 (764.3, 988.9) 65 (12, 82) 49 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Ingham County No 865.6 (823.0, 909.8) 66 (44, 78) 321 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Barry County No 860.6 (782.3, 944.6) 67 (25, 82) 91 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Clinton County No 859.3 (787.0, 936.4) 68 (28, 81) 106 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Arenac County No 857.5 (725.5, 1,006.5) 69 (8, 83) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Kalamazoo County No 847.3 (806.1, 890.2) 70 (50, 80) 324 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Midland County No 840.8 (776.2, 909.2) 71 (40, 81) 128 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.1, 7.5)
Missaukee County No 831.6 (689.3, 994.5) 72 (9, 83) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Washtenaw County No 830.2 (793.6, 868.1) 73 (56, 80) 397 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Oakland County No 830.1 (812.2, 848.3) 74 (62, 79) 1,681 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Marquette County No 825.7 (753.6, 902.7) 75 (38, 82) 100 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Charlevoix County No 823.8 (724.0, 933.5) 76 (23, 83) 50 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Grand Traverse County No 817.7 (757.7, 881.2) 77 (49, 82) 142 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Alger County No 802.3 (642.1, 990.2) 78 (9, 83) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Antrim County No 798.0 (699.6, 906.2) 79 (35, 83) 48 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Ottawa County No 797.6 (759.4, 837.2) 80 (64, 82) 333 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Benzie County No 728.1 (620.0, 849.6) 81 (53, 83) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Leelanau County No 686.1 (597.4, 784.2) 82 (71, 83) 44 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Keweenaw County No 656.4 (417.2, 984.6) 83 (3, 83) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/22/2024 7:01 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top