Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Michigan by County
All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages
Sorted by CI*Rank
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | N/A | No | 186.8 (185.2, 188.4) | N/A | 11,047 |
falling 
|
-1.5 (-1.5, -1.4) |
| United States | N/A | No | 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) | N/A | 317,428 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-1.8, -1.8) |
| Leelanau County | Urban | No | 135.0 (113.5, 160.8) | 83 (68, 83) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Alger County | Rural | No | 149.5 (111.3, 199.0) | 82 (14, 83) | 11 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.1, -1.1) |
| Washtenaw County | Urban | No | 152.4 (144.1, 161.0) | 81 (72, 83) | 270 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.1, -1.5) |
| Ottawa County | Urban | No | 160.4 (151.4, 169.9) | 80 (65, 82) | 246 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
| Oakland County | Urban | No | 160.9 (156.6, 165.2) | 79 (69, 82) | 1,164 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-1.9, -1.6) |
| Gogebic County | Rural | No | 164.1 (133.2, 201.6) | 78 (13, 83) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.6, -0.9) |
| Grand Traverse County | Urban | No | 168.7 (153.9, 184.6) | 77 (38, 82) | 103 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.2, -1.0) |
| Ontonagon County | Rural | No | 169.2 (128.4, 230.9) | 76 (4, 83) | 13 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.2, -0.6) |
| Presque Isle County | Rural | No | 171.2 (137.6, 213.0) | 75 (8, 83) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.3) |
| Clinton County | Urban | No | 172.2 (155.2, 190.6) | 74 (31, 82) | 80 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.9) |
| Benzie County | Urban | No | 172.4 (142.5, 207.9) | 73 (11, 83) | 27 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.5, -0.4) |
| Midland County | Urban | No | 173.7 (158.0, 190.6) | 72 (31, 82) | 94 |
stable 
|
1.9 (0.0, 6.3) |
| Charlevoix County | Rural | No | 174.5 (149.8, 202.9) | 71 (15, 83) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.6, -0.8) |
| Barry County | Urban | No | 175.8 (156.5, 196.9) | 70 (22, 82) | 68 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.3) |
| Emmet County | Rural | No | 176.2 (153.3, 202.1) | 69 (16, 83) | 46 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-7.0, 4.4) |
| Keweenaw County | Rural | No | 177.4 (107.4, 306.3) | 68 (1, 83) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-4.1, 0.6) |
| Livingston County | Urban | No | 177.5 (166.5, 189.1) | 67 (37, 78) | 212 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.2, -1.3) |
| Dickinson County | Rural | No | 178.2 (152.3, 207.9) | 66 (12, 83) | 36 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
| Antrim County | Rural | No | 179.3 (153.4, 209.5) | 65 (11, 83) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.9) |
| Marquette County | Rural | No | 180.2 (162.4, 199.5) | 64 (23, 81) | 80 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Eaton County | Urban | No | 180.6 (166.2, 196.0) | 63 (27, 79) | 125 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Huron County | Rural | No | 181.4 (158.4, 207.5) | 62 (13, 82) | 49 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.4) |
| Kalamazoo County | Urban | No | 182.6 (172.2, 193.6) | 61 (32, 74) | 241 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.1) |
| Menominee County | Rural | No | 182.8 (156.8, 212.8) | 60 (11, 83) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.4) |
| Luce County | Rural | No | 183.1 (132.6, 251.4) | 59 (1, 83) | 9 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.2, -0.6) |
| Cheboygan County | Rural | No | 185.1 (159.2, 215.0) | 58 (8, 82) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
| Allegan County | Rural | No | 185.2 (170.4, 200.9) | 57 (21, 77) | 129 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.8) |
| Wexford County | Rural | No | 186.0 (161.0, 214.0) | 56 (10, 82) | 43 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
| Van Buren County | Rural | No | 186.6 (168.8, 205.7) | 55 (15, 79) | 89 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.6, -0.8) |
| Kent County | Urban | No | 186.6 (179.7, 193.8) | 54 (33, 68) | 585 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.3, 2.7) |
| Berrien County | Urban | No | 187.5 (175.5, 200.1) | 53 (23, 74) | 193 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.1) |
| Shiawassee County | Rural | No | 187.5 (168.6, 208.1) | 52 (12, 80) | 78 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.7) |
| Lapeer County | Urban | No | 187.8 (171.3, 205.6) | 51 (17, 77) | 108 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.7) |
| Otsego County | Rural | No | 187.9 (159.6, 220.3) | 50 (7, 82) | 34 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.2, -0.2) |
| Mackinac County | Rural | No | 188.8 (151.0, 235.9) | 49 (2, 83) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.1, -0.6) |
| St. Joseph County | Rural | No | 189.0 (169.2, 210.5) | 48 (12, 79) | 71 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.2, -1.1) |
| Ionia County | Urban | No | 189.7 (169.0, 212.3) | 47 (9, 80) | 68 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7) |
| Newaygo County | Rural | No | 189.7 (168.7, 212.9) | 46 (9, 79) | 65 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.6, -0.5) |
| Ingham County | Urban | No | 190.5 (179.6, 201.8) | 45 (22, 71) | 249 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.0) |
| Wayne County | Urban | No | 191.5 (187.4, 195.7) | 44 (31, 58) | 1,772 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.6, -1.9) |
| Oceana County | Rural | No | 191.8 (164.5, 222.9) | 43 (5, 81) | 38 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.3) |
| Macomb County | Urban | No | 191.8 (186.3, 197.5) | 42 (29, 60) | 967 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.6, -1.3) |
| Gratiot County | Rural | No | 191.9 (168.2, 218.1) | 41 (8, 80) | 49 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.6, -0.3) |
| Manistee County | Rural | No | 192.2 (166.2, 222.1) | 40 (7, 81) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.4, -1.0) |
| Tuscola County | Rural | No | 193.5 (173.4, 215.5) | 39 (9, 78) | 74 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.4) |
| St. Clair County | Urban | No | 194.5 (182.3, 207.4) | 38 (17, 69) | 206 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.2) |
| Arenac County | Rural | No | 194.8 (159.4, 237.1) | 37 (3, 82) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.2, -0.7) |
| Saginaw County | Urban | No | 195.0 (183.7, 206.8) | 36 (18, 66) | 235 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.2) |
| Alcona County | Rural | No | 196.0 (159.1, 243.6) | 35 (2, 83) | 24 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.5) |
| Genesee County | Urban | No | 198.0 (189.9, 206.4) | 34 (18, 56) | 477 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.2) |
| Bay County | Urban | No | 198.5 (183.5, 214.5) | 33 (10, 69) | 139 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.2) |
| Delta County | Rural | No | 200.5 (177.0, 226.6) | 32 (5, 75) | 58 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
| Lenawee County | Rural | No | 200.9 (184.9, 218.0) | 31 (9, 68) | 125 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.7) |
| Monroe County | Urban | No | 201.2 (188.2, 214.9) | 30 (12, 63) | 193 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.8) |
| Branch County | Rural | No | 201.5 (177.9, 227.4) | 29 (4, 75) | 58 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
| Cass County | Urban | No | 202.3 (181.6, 225.0) | 28 (6, 73) | 77 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.4) |
| Jackson County | Urban | No | 204.9 (192.2, 218.2) | 27 (11, 59) | 207 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.6, -0.9) |
| Missaukee County | Rural | No | 205.1 (167.4, 249.6) | 26 (1, 82) | 23 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.5, 0.4) |
| Iron County | Rural | No | 206.8 (166.2, 256.7) | 25 (1, 82) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.9) |
| Isabella County | Rural | No | 207.1 (182.8, 233.7) | 24 (3, 72) | 58 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.8) |
| Sanilac County | Rural | No | 208.1 (184.9, 233.7) | 23 (3, 71) | 64 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.6, -0.7) |
| Alpena County | Rural | No | 212.0 (185.1, 242.2) | 22 (2, 72) | 48 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Roscommon County | Rural | No | 212.1 (184.6, 243.9) | 21 (2, 74) | 54 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
| Osceola County | Rural | No | 212.3 (180.9, 248.0) | 20 (2, 75) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.2) |
| Muskegon County | Urban | No | 214.1 (201.2, 227.6) | 19 (6, 42) | 223 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.7) |
| Houghton County | Rural | No | 215.8 (188.3, 246.5) | 18 (2, 71) | 47 |
stable
|
3.3 (-1.0, 10.1) |
| Ogemaw County | Rural | No | 216.0 (185.6, 251.2) | 17 (1, 73) | 41 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.5) |
| Montcalm County | Urban | No | 217.1 (196.8, 239.1) | 16 (3, 55) | 91 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.7) |
| Mecosta County | Rural | No | 218.0 (191.3, 247.6) | 15 (2, 69) | 54 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Montmorency County | Rural | No | 220.5 (176.8, 275.4) | 14 (1, 80) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.3, -0.2) |
| Mason County | Rural | No | 221.5 (193.4, 253.2) | 13 (1, 63) | 49 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.6, -0.2) |
| Chippewa County | Rural | No | 221.9 (195.8, 250.9) | 12 (1, 62) | 54 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.5, -0.1) |
| Calhoun County | Urban | No | 222.0 (207.1, 237.7) | 11 (3, 34) | 177 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.6) |
| Hillsdale County | Rural | No | 223.7 (199.8, 249.8) | 10 (1, 59) | 70 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Iosco County | Rural | No | 224.3 (196.8, 255.6) | 9 (1, 62) | 54 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.4) |
| Gladwin County | Rural | No | 224.5 (195.3, 257.5) | 8 (1, 61) | 49 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Lake County | Rural | No | 229.8 (190.4, 277.1) | 7 (1, 76) | 27 |
falling
|
-12.0 (-20.1, -5.7) |
| Crawford County | Rural | No | 236.8 (198.0, 283.1) | 6 (1, 68) | 29 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.9, 10.9) |
| Oscoda County | Rural | No | 243.4 (194.1, 304.9) | 5 (1, 73) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.6, 0.8) |
| Schoolcraft County | Rural | No | 246.0 (194.8, 310.2) | 4 (1, 76) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.0, 0.8) |
| Clare County | Rural | No | 246.2 (218.2, 277.5) | 3 (1, 29) | 62 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.3) |
| Baraga County | Rural | No | 253.7 (199.4, 320.1) | 2 (1, 72) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.4) |
| Kalkaska County | Urban | No | 273.1 (229.6, 322.8) | 1 (1, 29) | 33 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.5) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/05/2025 9:27 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/05/2025 9:27 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.