Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan No 189.4 (187.8, 191.1) N/A 10,954 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
United States No 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) N/A 315,770 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Alcona County No 211.4 (173.6, 259.7) 20 (1, 81) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Alger County No 163.1 (124.3, 213.1) 77 (7, 83) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.1)
Allegan County No 197.6 (182.3, 213.9) 37 (11, 70) 133 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Alpena County No 210.9 (184.0, 241.2) 21 (2, 74) 47 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Antrim County No 186.0 (159.7, 216.5) 60 (8, 82) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Arenac County No 187.0 (153.6, 227.1) 56 (4, 83) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Baraga County No 196.4 (150.3, 254.3) 42 (1, 83) 13 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Barry County No 186.5 (166.7, 208.0) 59 (16, 80) 71 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Bay County No 207.8 (192.3, 224.3) 24 (6, 62) 141 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Benzie County No 166.5 (137.1, 201.7) 76 (13, 83) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Berrien County No 189.4 (177.3, 202.1) 54 (21, 71) 192 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Branch County No 225.2 (199.9, 253.0) 10 (1, 59) 61 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Calhoun County No 215.2 (200.7, 230.6) 17 (5, 52) 171 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Cass County No 204.3 (183.6, 227.0) 30 (5, 70) 77 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Charlevoix County No 158.0 (133.5, 186.4) 82 (33, 83) 32 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Cheboygan County No 196.9 (169.8, 228.0) 40 (4, 81) 43 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Chippewa County No 203.4 (178.5, 231.0) 33 (4, 77) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Clare County No 252.1 (223.9, 283.4) 1 (1, 31) 63 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Clinton County No 168.4 (151.5, 186.8) 75 (39, 83) 76 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Crawford County No 206.0 (170.9, 248.2) 26 (1, 81) 26 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Delta County No 203.9 (180.2, 230.2) 32 (5, 76) 58 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Dickinson County No 184.1 (157.9, 214.0) 64 (9, 82) 37 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Eaton County No 184.1 (169.4, 199.8) 63 (24, 78) 123 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Emmet County No 176.2 (153.0, 202.5) 68 (16, 83) 44 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Genesee County No 197.6 (189.5, 205.9) 38 (20, 60) 475 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Gladwin County No 225.4 (196.8, 257.8) 9 (1, 66) 50 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Gogebic County No 174.6 (143.3, 212.3) 69 (8, 83) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Grand Traverse County No 160.1 (145.6, 175.9) 80 (56, 83) 94 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Gratiot County No 209.5 (184.2, 237.4) 23 (3, 72) 51 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Hillsdale County No 238.8 (213.8, 266.0) 7 (1, 39) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Houghton County No 204.4 (177.5, 234.5) 29 (3, 77) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Huron County No 178.3 (155.7, 203.9) 66 (13, 83) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Ingham County No 187.0 (176.3, 198.1) 57 (28, 72) 244 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Ionia County No 188.1 (167.5, 210.6) 55 (14, 80) 66 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Iosco County No 207.2 (180.8, 237.4) 25 (2, 75) 49 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Iron County No 195.4 (154.8, 245.9) 46 (1, 83) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Isabella County No 192.1 (169.7, 216.6) 51 (8, 80) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Jackson County No 221.1 (207.7, 235.1) 11 (4, 40) 216 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Kalamazoo County No 178.0 (167.7, 188.8) 67 (43, 77) 234 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Kalkaska County No 249.7 (209.0, 296.5) 2 (1, 59) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Kent County No 185.2 (178.2, 192.3) 61 (39, 70) 569 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Keweenaw County No 168.9 (92.2, 308.8) 72 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.5)
Lake County No 245.5 (203.9, 295.5) 4 (1, 64) 29 stable stable trend 13.5 (-2.5, 32.2)
Lapeer County No 194.7 (177.7, 212.9) 48 (12, 73) 109 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Leelanau County No 140.1 (116.8, 168.2) 83 (57, 83) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Lenawee County No 204.0 (187.7, 221.3) 31 (9, 66) 124 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Livingston County No 168.9 (157.9, 180.5) 73 (53, 82) 193 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Luce County No 193.1 (141.2, 260.3) 49 (1, 83) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Mackinac County No 196.2 (157.9, 243.8) 43 (1, 83) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Macomb County No 196.0 (190.4, 201.8) 44 (27, 58) 971 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Manistee County No 215.3 (187.7, 246.8) 16 (1, 70) 46 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Marquette County No 173.6 (156.2, 192.6) 70 (31, 82) 77 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Mason County No 201.9 (174.9, 232.3) 34 (3, 78) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Mecosta County No 216.8 (190.8, 245.5) 14 (1, 69) 56 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Menominee County No 192.1 (165.0, 223.3) 50 (5, 82) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Midland County No 168.6 (153.0, 185.4) 74 (42, 83) 89 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.3, 5.4)
Missaukee County No 172.2 (138.4, 212.6) 71 (6, 83) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Monroe County No 211.7 (198.0, 226.1) 19 (7, 53) 192 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Montcalm County No 213.0 (192.7, 235.0) 18 (3, 62) 85 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Montmorency County No 236.5 (190.2, 294.3) 8 (1, 73) 22 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Muskegon County No 215.4 (202.3, 229.1) 15 (5, 49) 216 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Newaygo County No 196.6 (175.1, 220.3) 41 (7, 75) 65 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Oakland County No 161.8 (157.5, 166.2) 79 (68, 82) 1,136 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Oceana County No 186.9 (159.7, 217.9) 58 (6, 82) 36 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Ogemaw County No 243.7 (212.0, 280.1) 5 (1, 44) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Ontonagon County No 181.5 (138.5, 245.8) 65 (2, 83) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Osceola County No 219.5 (187.9, 255.5) 12 (1, 75) 37 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Oscoda County No 246.4 (196.1, 309.1) 3 (1, 74) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Otsego County No 185.0 (156.8, 217.3) 62 (7, 83) 32 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Ottawa County No 162.1 (152.9, 171.8) 78 (64, 83) 238 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Presque Isle County No 204.7 (166.3, 251.6) 28 (1, 82) 26 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Roscommon County No 239.2 (208.3, 274.6) 6 (1, 56) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Saginaw County No 190.1 (179.0, 201.8) 53 (25, 69) 229 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Sanilac County No 210.6 (187.3, 236.4) 22 (4, 69) 64 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Schoolcraft County No 216.8 (169.6, 277.0) 13 (1, 82) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Shiawassee County No 198.5 (179.2, 219.5) 36 (7, 73) 83 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
St. Clair County No 195.9 (183.5, 208.9) 45 (16, 67) 199 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.4)
St. Joseph County No 195.2 (175.0, 217.1) 47 (9, 76) 72 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Tuscola County No 191.9 (172.0, 213.7) 52 (10, 79) 72 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Van Buren County No 204.8 (186.1, 224.9) 27 (6, 68) 95 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Washtenaw County No 159.2 (150.6, 168.2) 81 (66, 83) 268 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
Wayne County No 198.5 (194.3, 202.8) 35 (26, 53) 1,798 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.3, -2.1)
Wexford County No 197.4 (171.6, 226.4) 39 (5, 80) 44 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/28/2022 4:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top