Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Michigan by County
All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | N/A | No | 186.8 (185.2, 188.4) | N/A | 11,047 |
falling 
|
-1.5 (-1.5, -1.4) |
| United States | N/A | No | 173.2 (173.0, 173.5) | N/A | 317,428 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-1.8, -1.8) |
| Kalkaska County | Urban | No | 273.1 (229.6, 322.8) | 1 (1, 29) | 33 |
stable 
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.5) |
| Baraga County | Rural | No | 253.7 (199.4, 320.1) | 2 (1, 72) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.4) |
| Clare County | Rural | No | 246.2 (218.2, 277.5) | 3 (1, 29) | 62 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.3) |
| Schoolcraft County | Rural | No | 246.0 (194.8, 310.2) | 4 (1, 76) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.0, 0.8) |
| Oscoda County | Rural | No | 243.4 (194.1, 304.9) | 5 (1, 73) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.6, 0.8) |
| Crawford County | Rural | No | 236.8 (198.0, 283.1) | 6 (1, 68) | 29 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.9, 10.9) |
| Lake County | Rural | No | 229.8 (190.4, 277.1) | 7 (1, 76) | 27 |
falling
|
-12.0 (-20.1, -5.7) |
| Gladwin County | Rural | No | 224.5 (195.3, 257.5) | 8 (1, 61) | 49 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Iosco County | Rural | No | 224.3 (196.8, 255.6) | 9 (1, 62) | 54 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.4) |
| Hillsdale County | Rural | No | 223.7 (199.8, 249.8) | 10 (1, 59) | 70 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Calhoun County | Urban | No | 222.0 (207.1, 237.7) | 11 (3, 34) | 177 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.6) |
| Chippewa County | Rural | No | 221.9 (195.8, 250.9) | 12 (1, 62) | 54 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.5, -0.1) |
| Mason County | Rural | No | 221.5 (193.4, 253.2) | 13 (1, 63) | 49 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.6, -0.2) |
| Montmorency County | Rural | No | 220.5 (176.8, 275.4) | 14 (1, 80) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.3, -0.2) |
| Mecosta County | Rural | No | 218.0 (191.3, 247.6) | 15 (2, 69) | 54 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Montcalm County | Urban | No | 217.1 (196.8, 239.1) | 16 (3, 55) | 91 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.7) |
| Ogemaw County | Rural | No | 216.0 (185.6, 251.2) | 17 (1, 73) | 41 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.5) |
| Houghton County | Rural | No | 215.8 (188.3, 246.5) | 18 (2, 71) | 47 |
stable
|
3.3 (-1.0, 10.1) |
| Muskegon County | Urban | No | 214.1 (201.2, 227.6) | 19 (6, 42) | 223 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.7) |
| Osceola County | Rural | No | 212.3 (180.9, 248.0) | 20 (2, 75) | 35 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.2) |
| Roscommon County | Rural | No | 212.1 (184.6, 243.9) | 21 (2, 74) | 54 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
| Alpena County | Rural | No | 212.0 (185.1, 242.2) | 22 (2, 72) | 48 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Sanilac County | Rural | No | 208.1 (184.9, 233.7) | 23 (3, 71) | 64 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.6, -0.7) |
| Isabella County | Rural | No | 207.1 (182.8, 233.7) | 24 (3, 72) | 58 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.8) |
| Iron County | Rural | No | 206.8 (166.2, 256.7) | 25 (1, 82) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.9) |
| Missaukee County | Rural | No | 205.1 (167.4, 249.6) | 26 (1, 82) | 23 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.5, 0.4) |
| Jackson County | Urban | No | 204.9 (192.2, 218.2) | 27 (11, 59) | 207 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.6, -0.9) |
| Cass County | Urban | No | 202.3 (181.6, 225.0) | 28 (6, 73) | 77 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.4) |
| Branch County | Rural | No | 201.5 (177.9, 227.4) | 29 (4, 75) | 58 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
| Monroe County | Urban | No | 201.2 (188.2, 214.9) | 30 (12, 63) | 193 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.8) |
| Lenawee County | Rural | No | 200.9 (184.9, 218.0) | 31 (9, 68) | 125 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.7) |
| Delta County | Rural | No | 200.5 (177.0, 226.6) | 32 (5, 75) | 58 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
| Bay County | Urban | No | 198.5 (183.5, 214.5) | 33 (10, 69) | 139 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.2) |
| Genesee County | Urban | No | 198.0 (189.9, 206.4) | 34 (18, 56) | 477 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.2) |
| Alcona County | Rural | No | 196.0 (159.1, 243.6) | 35 (2, 83) | 24 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.5) |
| Saginaw County | Urban | No | 195.0 (183.7, 206.8) | 36 (18, 66) | 235 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.2) |
| Arenac County | Rural | No | 194.8 (159.4, 237.1) | 37 (3, 82) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.2, -0.7) |
| St. Clair County | Urban | No | 194.5 (182.3, 207.4) | 38 (17, 69) | 206 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.2) |
| Tuscola County | Rural | No | 193.5 (173.4, 215.5) | 39 (9, 78) | 74 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.4) |
| Manistee County | Rural | No | 192.2 (166.2, 222.1) | 40 (7, 81) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.4, -1.0) |
| Gratiot County | Rural | No | 191.9 (168.2, 218.1) | 41 (8, 80) | 49 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.6, -0.3) |
| Macomb County | Urban | No | 191.8 (186.3, 197.5) | 42 (29, 60) | 967 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.6, -1.3) |
| Oceana County | Rural | No | 191.8 (164.5, 222.9) | 43 (5, 81) | 38 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.3) |
| Wayne County | Urban | No | 191.5 (187.4, 195.7) | 44 (31, 58) | 1,772 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-3.6, -1.9) |
| Ingham County | Urban | No | 190.5 (179.6, 201.8) | 45 (22, 71) | 249 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.0) |
| Newaygo County | Rural | No | 189.7 (168.7, 212.9) | 46 (9, 79) | 65 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.6, -0.5) |
| Ionia County | Urban | No | 189.7 (169.0, 212.3) | 47 (9, 80) | 68 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7) |
| St. Joseph County | Rural | No | 189.0 (169.2, 210.5) | 48 (12, 79) | 71 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.2, -1.1) |
| Mackinac County | Rural | No | 188.8 (151.0, 235.9) | 49 (2, 83) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.1, -0.6) |
| Otsego County | Rural | No | 187.9 (159.6, 220.3) | 50 (7, 82) | 34 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.2, -0.2) |
| Lapeer County | Urban | No | 187.8 (171.3, 205.6) | 51 (17, 77) | 108 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.7) |
| Shiawassee County | Rural | No | 187.5 (168.6, 208.1) | 52 (12, 80) | 78 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.7) |
| Berrien County | Urban | No | 187.5 (175.5, 200.1) | 53 (23, 74) | 193 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.1) |
| Kent County | Urban | No | 186.6 (179.7, 193.8) | 54 (33, 68) | 585 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.3, 2.7) |
| Van Buren County | Rural | No | 186.6 (168.8, 205.7) | 55 (15, 79) | 89 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.6, -0.8) |
| Wexford County | Rural | No | 186.0 (161.0, 214.0) | 56 (10, 82) | 43 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
| Allegan County | Rural | No | 185.2 (170.4, 200.9) | 57 (21, 77) | 129 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.8) |
| Cheboygan County | Rural | No | 185.1 (159.2, 215.0) | 58 (8, 82) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
| Luce County | Rural | No | 183.1 (132.6, 251.4) | 59 (1, 83) | 9 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.2, -0.6) |
| Menominee County | Rural | No | 182.8 (156.8, 212.8) | 60 (11, 83) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.4) |
| Kalamazoo County | Urban | No | 182.6 (172.2, 193.6) | 61 (32, 74) | 241 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.7, -1.1) |
| Huron County | Rural | No | 181.4 (158.4, 207.5) | 62 (13, 82) | 49 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.4) |
| Eaton County | Urban | No | 180.6 (166.2, 196.0) | 63 (27, 79) | 125 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Marquette County | Rural | No | 180.2 (162.4, 199.5) | 64 (23, 81) | 80 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Antrim County | Rural | No | 179.3 (153.4, 209.5) | 65 (11, 83) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.9) |
| Dickinson County | Rural | No | 178.2 (152.3, 207.9) | 66 (12, 83) | 36 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
| Livingston County | Urban | No | 177.5 (166.5, 189.1) | 67 (37, 78) | 212 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.2, -1.3) |
| Keweenaw County | Rural | No | 177.4 (107.4, 306.3) | 68 (1, 83) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-4.1, 0.6) |
| Emmet County | Rural | No | 176.2 (153.3, 202.1) | 69 (16, 83) | 46 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-7.0, 4.4) |
| Barry County | Urban | No | 175.8 (156.5, 196.9) | 70 (22, 82) | 68 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.3) |
| Charlevoix County | Rural | No | 174.5 (149.8, 202.9) | 71 (15, 83) | 38 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.6, -0.8) |
| Midland County | Urban | No | 173.7 (158.0, 190.6) | 72 (31, 82) | 94 |
stable
|
1.9 (0.0, 6.3) |
| Benzie County | Urban | No | 172.4 (142.5, 207.9) | 73 (11, 83) | 27 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.5, -0.4) |
| Clinton County | Urban | No | 172.2 (155.2, 190.6) | 74 (31, 82) | 80 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.9, -0.9) |
| Presque Isle County | Rural | No | 171.2 (137.6, 213.0) | 75 (8, 83) | 23 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.3) |
| Ontonagon County | Rural | No | 169.2 (128.4, 230.9) | 76 (4, 83) | 13 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.2, -0.6) |
| Grand Traverse County | Urban | No | 168.7 (153.9, 184.6) | 77 (38, 82) | 103 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.2, -1.0) |
| Gogebic County | Rural | No | 164.1 (133.2, 201.6) | 78 (13, 83) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.7 (-2.6, -0.9) |
| Oakland County | Urban | No | 160.9 (156.6, 165.2) | 79 (69, 82) | 1,164 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-1.9, -1.6) |
| Ottawa County | Urban | No | 160.4 (151.4, 169.9) | 80 (65, 82) | 246 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
| Washtenaw County | Urban | No | 152.4 (144.1, 161.0) | 81 (72, 83) | 270 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.1, -1.5) |
| Alger County | Rural | No | 149.5 (111.3, 199.0) | 82 (14, 83) | 11 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.1, -1.1) |
| Leelanau County | Urban | No | 135.0 (113.5, 160.8) | 83 (68, 83) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.9, -0.6) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/02/2025 7:48 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/02/2025 7:48 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.