Death Rates Table
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | N/A | No | 158.3 (157.3, 159.3) | N/A | 21,068 |
falling 
|
-1.3 (-1.4, -1.2) |
| United States | N/A | No | 146.0 (145.8, 146.2) | N/A | 602,955 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.6, -1.4) |
| Kalkaska County | Urban | No | 224.8 (197.9, 254.5) | 1 (1, 24) | 57 |
stable 
|
8.1 (-0.3, 14.1) |
| Montmorency County | Rural | No | 205.5 (174.3, 242.4) | 2 (1, 58) | 39 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.4, 0.3) |
| Clare County | Rural | No | 205.1 (187.0, 224.7) | 3 (1, 28) | 105 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.2) |
| Baraga County | Rural | No | 198.8 (165.4, 238.2) | 4 (1, 70) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.1, 0.4) |
| Luce County | Rural | No | 197.8 (158.0, 246.8) | 5 (1, 78) | 19 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.1, 0.0) |
| Iosco County | Rural | No | 195.2 (176.6, 215.8) | 6 (1, 40) | 97 |
stable
|
4.4 (-0.9, 10.9) |
| Crawford County | Rural | No | 195.2 (170.5, 223.4) | 7 (1, 62) | 49 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-7.0, 0.9) |
| Chippewa County | Rural | No | 193.1 (176.0, 211.6) | 8 (1, 40) | 98 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-0.8, 0.3) |
| Lake County | Rural | No | 192.9 (166.4, 223.6) | 9 (1, 65) | 44 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.7, 7.0) |
| Oscoda County | Rural | No | 191.9 (160.7, 229.0) | 10 (1, 75) | 30 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.5, 0.7) |
| Ogemaw County | Rural | No | 187.4 (167.2, 210.0) | 11 (1, 61) | 72 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.6) |
| Alcona County | Rural | No | 185.8 (160.0, 216.9) | 12 (1, 73) | 45 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.2) |
| Gladwin County | Rural | No | 185.7 (167.3, 206.0) | 13 (2, 60) | 86 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
| Hillsdale County | Rural | No | 185.5 (170.8, 201.3) | 14 (2, 47) | 125 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.0, -0.1) |
| Schoolcraft County | Rural | No | 185.5 (155.2, 221.9) | 15 (1, 78) | 29 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-0.9, 0.3) |
| Calhoun County | Urban | No | 183.9 (174.9, 193.2) | 16 (5, 34) | 329 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.0, -0.5) |
| Mecosta County | Rural | No | 183.1 (166.9, 200.6) | 17 (2, 57) | 102 |
falling
|
-0.5 (-0.9, -0.1) |
| Roscommon County | Rural | No | 182.8 (164.5, 203.3) | 18 (2, 63) | 91 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.8, 0.3) |
| Isabella County | Rural | No | 180.0 (165.1, 195.9) | 19 (3, 61) | 113 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.2, 0.0) |
| Alpena County | Rural | No | 179.0 (162.2, 197.4) | 20 (3, 66) | 91 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
| Mason County | Rural | No | 178.2 (161.0, 197.1) | 21 (3, 65) | 87 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.3) |
| Muskegon County | Urban | No | 177.7 (169.9, 185.8) | 22 (9, 43) | 410 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-0.9, -0.5) |
| Montcalm County | Urban | No | 177.3 (164.9, 190.5) | 23 (6, 55) | 157 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.6) |
| Iron County | Rural | No | 177.2 (151.1, 207.8) | 24 (1, 79) | 41 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.6) |
| Sanilac County | Rural | No | 176.9 (162.0, 192.9) | 25 (4, 64) | 115 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.3) |
| Gratiot County | Rural | No | 176.2 (160.5, 193.1) | 26 (4, 67) | 96 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.0, 0.1) |
| Arenac County | Rural | No | 175.0 (151.3, 202.2) | 27 (2, 78) | 45 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.4) |
| Osceola County | Rural | No | 174.1 (154.6, 195.7) | 28 (3, 73) | 62 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.3) |
| Houghton County | Rural | No | 172.6 (155.7, 191.0) | 29 (5, 71) | 81 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
| Jackson County | Urban | No | 172.5 (164.7, 180.7) | 30 (13, 53) | 379 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
| Cass County | Urban | No | 172.5 (159.4, 186.6) | 31 (7, 68) | 138 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) |
| Tuscola County | Rural | No | 171.9 (159.0, 185.7) | 32 (8, 66) | 140 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.3) |
| Manistee County | Rural | No | 171.0 (153.7, 190.2) | 33 (5, 73) | 79 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
| Genesee County | Urban | No | 170.3 (165.3, 175.4) | 34 (19, 50) | 937 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-3.0, -1.1) |
| Bay County | Urban | No | 168.7 (159.5, 178.4) | 35 (14, 63) | 265 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.1, -0.7) |
| St. Clair County | Urban | No | 168.5 (160.9, 176.4) | 36 (17, 60) | 388 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.3, -0.9) |
| Monroe County | Urban | No | 165.9 (158.1, 174.0) | 37 (19, 64) | 358 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.3, -0.8) |
| Delta County | Rural | No | 165.4 (151.0, 181.1) | 38 (9, 73) | 107 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) |
| Missaukee County | Rural | No | 165.2 (141.5, 192.2) | 39 (4, 81) | 38 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.4, 0.2) |
| Branch County | Rural | No | 164.1 (149.7, 179.6) | 40 (11, 74) | 101 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.3) |
| Wayne County | Urban | No | 164.0 (161.5, 166.5) | 41 (32, 55) | 3,540 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.4, -1.7) |
| Newaygo County | Rural | No | 163.2 (149.8, 177.6) | 42 (13, 74) | 118 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Lapeer County | Urban | No | 163.2 (153.0, 174.0) | 43 (17, 71) | 205 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.6) |
| Wexford County | Rural | No | 163.0 (146.8, 180.6) | 44 (11, 76) | 79 |
stable
|
-3.1 (-8.2, 1.9) |
| Macomb County | Urban | No | 162.6 (159.3, 166.0) | 45 (33, 60) | 1,906 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.1, -0.9) |
| Van Buren County | Rural | No | 162.4 (151.3, 174.2) | 46 (17, 73) | 169 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) |
| Ionia County | Urban | No | 162.3 (149.4, 176.1) | 47 (15, 74) | 123 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Berrien County | Urban | No | 162.0 (154.5, 169.7) | 48 (24, 68) | 373 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
| Shiawassee County | Rural | No | 161.8 (150.3, 174.0) | 49 (17, 73) | 155 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.7) |
| Allegan County | Rural | No | 161.6 (152.4, 171.2) | 50 (22, 71) | 247 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.6) |
| Huron County | Rural | No | 161.0 (146.0, 177.4) | 51 (13, 77) | 94 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.4) |
| Ingham County | Urban | No | 160.9 (154.3, 167.6) | 52 (28, 68) | 480 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.1) |
| Menominee County | Rural | No | 160.7 (143.7, 179.8) | 53 (10, 80) | 69 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.2, 0.0) |
| Charlevoix County | Rural | No | 158.8 (141.9, 177.5) | 54 (11, 81) | 72 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| St. Joseph County | Rural | No | 158.7 (146.4, 171.8) | 55 (20, 77) | 130 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.8) |
| Lenawee County | Rural | No | 158.7 (149.2, 168.6) | 56 (26, 73) | 223 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.7) |
| Cheboygan County | Rural | No | 158.5 (142.0, 177.0) | 57 (13, 80) | 76 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.6, -0.4) |
| Otsego County | Rural | No | 158.5 (140.6, 178.4) | 58 (10, 81) | 61 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.3) |
| Saginaw County | Urban | No | 157.7 (150.9, 164.7) | 59 (33, 72) | 433 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.4, -1.0) |
| Oceana County | Rural | No | 157.1 (139.8, 176.2) | 60 (12, 82) | 65 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.1) |
| Kalamazoo County | Urban | No | 155.3 (149.0, 161.9) | 61 (39, 73) | 470 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
| Eaton County | Urban | No | 154.9 (146.1, 164.3) | 62 (31, 75) | 239 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
| Emmet County | Rural | No | 152.2 (137.6, 168.2) | 63 (22, 82) | 86 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.2, 1.3) |
| Kent County | Urban | No | 151.8 (147.7, 156.0) | 64 (52, 74) | 1,084 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.2, -0.9) |
| Barry County | Urban | No | 151.8 (139.9, 164.4) | 65 (28, 81) | 129 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Marquette County | Rural | No | 151.5 (140.2, 163.6) | 66 (30, 80) | 142 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
| Ontonagon County | Rural | No | 150.8 (124.2, 187.3) | 67 (5, 83) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.0, 0.1) |
| Midland County | Urban | No | 150.6 (140.7, 161.0) | 68 (36, 79) | 183 |
rising 
|
2.1 (0.6, 4.8) |
| Mackinac County | Rural | No | 148.1 (125.0, 175.7) | 69 (11, 83) | 32 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.6, -1.0) |
| Antrim County | Rural | No | 147.6 (130.9, 166.5) | 70 (22, 83) | 64 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.0, -1.0) |
| Presque Isle County | Rural | No | 146.5 (125.0, 171.9) | 71 (13, 83) | 41 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.6) |
| Livingston County | Urban | No | 146.2 (139.5, 153.1) | 72 (54, 80) | 381 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-1.8, -1.3) |
| Benzie County | Urban | No | 145.0 (125.5, 167.4) | 73 (18, 83) | 47 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.1, -0.6) |
| Alger County | Rural | No | 144.9 (118.1, 177.4) | 74 (10, 83) | 22 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.9, -0.3) |
| Dickinson County | Rural | No | 140.2 (124.3, 157.9) | 75 (32, 83) | 61 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.7) |
| Grand Traverse County | Urban | No | 140.1 (131.3, 149.5) | 76 (60, 82) | 198 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.9) |
| Oakland County | Urban | No | 137.3 (134.7, 139.8) | 77 (71, 82) | 2,311 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.5, -1.5) |
| Ottawa County | Urban | No | 137.0 (131.5, 142.7) | 78 (68, 82) | 478 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.1, -0.7) |
| Gogebic County | Rural | No | 135.7 (116.2, 158.6) | 79 (31, 83) | 38 |
falling
|
-3.7 (-11.8, -1.6) |
| Washtenaw County | Urban | No | 134.7 (129.6, 140.0) | 80 (71, 83) | 545 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.7, -1.3) |
| Clinton County | Urban | No | 134.2 (124.3, 144.8) | 81 (65, 83) | 140 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.8, -1.0) |
| Keweenaw County | Rural | No | 131.6 (85.9, 206.0) | 82 (1, 83) | 6 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-3.6, -0.2) |
| Leelanau County | Urban | Yes | 115.4 (101.2, 131.6) | 83 (73, 83) | 57 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.2, -0.9) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/07/2024 4:58 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/07/2024 4:58 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.