Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan Yes 54.2 (53.5, 54.8) N/A 6,196 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
United States Yes 50.4 (50.3, 50.5) N/A 175,590 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Roscommon County Yes 81.9 (65.1, 102.3) 1 (1, 39) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Montmorency County Yes 75.5 (53.2, 106.7) 2 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Kalkaska County Yes 71.1 (55.5, 90.3) 3 (1, 69) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Alger County Yes 70.4 (48.6, 100.5) 4 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Ontonagon County Yes 68.7 (42.3, 111.7) 5 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.0)
Otsego County Yes 68.2 (54.1, 85.2) 6 (1, 68) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Missaukee County Yes 68.2 (51.5, 89.2) 7 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Calhoun County Yes 68.0 (62.0, 74.5) 8 (2, 36) 104 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Alcona County Yes 65.6 (46.2, 93.6) 9 (1, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Lake County Yes 65.2 (46.9, 89.9) 10 (1, 81) 11 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.1)
Genesee County Yes 65.2 (61.8, 68.7) 11 (4, 31) 309 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Jackson County Yes 64.9 (59.7, 70.6) 12 (3, 41) 122 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Wayne County Yes 62.9 (61.2, 64.5) 13 (9, 32) 1,238 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Shiawassee County Yes 62.3 (54.7, 70.8) 14 (3, 60) 53 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Mecosta County Yes 62.3 (51.7, 74.5) 15 (1, 70) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Clare County Yes 62.1 (50.5, 75.9) 16 (1, 73) 24 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Monroe County Yes 61.9 (56.6, 67.6) 17 (5, 50) 111 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Hillsdale County Yes 61.9 (52.2, 72.9) 18 (2, 66) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Sanilac County Yes 61.7 (52.0, 72.9) 19 (2, 67) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Iosco County Yes 61.7 (48.9, 77.5) 20 (1, 77) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Gladwin County Yes 61.7 (49.0, 77.1) 21 (1, 77) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Crawford County Yes 61.6 (44.1, 84.6) 22 (1, 82) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Cass County Yes 61.0 (52.4, 70.7) 23 (3, 65) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Lenawee County Yes 60.5 (54.0, 67.7) 24 (4, 62) 70 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.7, 6.6)
Ogemaw County Yes 60.4 (46.7, 77.6) 25 (1, 81) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Van Buren County Yes 60.3 (52.9, 68.6) 26 (3, 66) 53 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Arenac County Yes 60.0 (45.0, 79.5) 27 (1, 82) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.6)
Wexford County Yes 59.9 (49.2, 72.5) 28 (2, 75) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
St. Joseph County Yes 59.8 (51.6, 69.1) 29 (4, 67) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.1)
Cheboygan County Yes 59.7 (47.6, 74.6) 30 (1, 79) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Bay County Yes 59.7 (53.5, 66.5) 31 (6, 62) 76 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Huron County Yes 59.6 (48.5, 72.9) 32 (2, 77) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Muskegon County Yes 59.5 (54.7, 64.7) 33 (9, 56) 121 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Berrien County Yes 59.4 (54.3, 64.9) 34 (7, 59) 109 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Osceola County Yes 59.3 (46.5, 75.0) 35 (1, 79) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.5)
Oscoda County Yes 58.6 (37.0, 90.0) 36 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Ingham County Yes 57.8 (53.7, 62.1) 37 (14, 58) 160 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Gratiot County Yes 57.6 (47.8, 69.1) 38 (3, 77) 25 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Saginaw County Yes 57.6 (53.0, 62.5) 39 (11, 59) 128 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Schoolcraft County Yes 57.3 (38.7, 84.8) 40 (1, 82) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Alpena County Yes 56.5 (45.9, 69.3) 41 (3, 80) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.2)
Branch County Yes 56.4 (47.0, 67.2) 42 (4, 78) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Charlevoix County Yes 56.3 (43.7, 71.8) 43 (2, 81) 17 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Ionia County Yes 56.0 (48.5, 64.4) 44 (6, 72) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Chippewa County Yes 55.9 (46.0, 67.6) 45 (3, 79) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Benzie County Yes 55.4 (41.5, 73.4) 46 (2, 82) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Tuscola County Yes 55.2 (47.3, 64.3) 47 (7, 76) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Oceana County Yes 54.9 (43.1, 69.3) 48 (3, 81) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
St. Clair County Yes 54.6 (50.0, 59.6) 49 (21, 67) 114 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Mackinac County Yes 54.2 (37.9, 77.2) 50 (1, 82) 9 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.7, -1.2)
Baraga County Yes 54.1 (34.9, 81.5) 51 (1, 82) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.5)
Macomb County Yes 53.9 (51.8, 56.1) 52 (34, 61) 544 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3)
Newaygo County Yes 53.3 (44.8, 63.0) 53 (8, 79) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Montcalm County Yes 53.0 (45.6, 61.3) 54 (13, 79) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Lapeer County Yes 52.9 (46.9, 59.7) 55 (17, 75) 61 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Antrim County Yes 52.4 (40.7, 67.1) 56 (4, 82) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Eaton County Yes 51.8 (46.1, 58.1) 57 (23, 76) 67 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Kalamazoo County Yes 51.5 (47.6, 55.8) 58 (31, 70) 134 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Houghton County Yes 51.3 (40.9, 63.8) 59 (6, 82) 19 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Leelanau County Yes 50.9 (37.5, 68.1) 60 (3, 82) 14 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.1)
Barry County Yes 50.7 (43.4, 59.1) 61 (17, 80) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Manistee County Yes 50.4 (39.6, 64.0) 62 (6, 82) 17 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Allegan County Yes 50.0 (44.6, 55.9) 63 (29, 79) 68 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Luce County Yes 49.7 (29.6, 81.0) 64 (1, 82) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Emmet County Yes 48.7 (39.4, 60.0) 65 (12, 82) 22 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Isabella County Yes 48.3 (40.6, 57.1) 66 (18, 82) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Gogebic County Yes 47.2 (34.3, 64.5) 67 (4, 82) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Menominee County Yes 47.0 (36.0, 60.9) 68 (9, 82) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Mason County Yes 46.7 (36.6, 59.1) 69 (12, 82) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Marquette County Yes 46.6 (39.8, 54.4) 70 (31, 82) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Kent County Yes 45.4 (43.1, 47.8) 71 (58, 79) 303 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Delta County Yes 45.1 (36.5, 55.4) 72 (29, 82) 22 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Midland County Yes 44.6 (38.6, 51.5) 73 (43, 82) 42 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Washtenaw County Yes 43.8 (40.7, 47.0) 74 (60, 81) 158 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Presque Isle County Yes 43.7 (28.6, 65.5) 75 (4, 82) 7 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.8, 0.0)
Clinton County Yes 43.5 (37.3, 50.5) 76 (47, 82) 39 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.1)
Oakland County Yes 43.4 (41.8, 45.0) 77 (65, 80) 646 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Grand Traverse County Yes 42.8 (37.4, 49.0) 78 (52, 82) 49 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Livingston County Yes 42.4 (38.6, 46.6) 79 (60, 82) 101 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Dickinson County Yes 42.2 (32.3, 54.7) 80 (27, 82) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Ottawa County Yes 41.4 (38.1, 45.0) 81 (64, 82) 119 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Iron County Yes 35.9 (23.4, 55.2) 82 (27, 82) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.7)
Keweenaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/07/2020 5:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top