Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan *** 191.6 (190.0, 193.3) N/A 10,877 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)
United States *** 181.4 (181.1, 181.7) N/A 314,987 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -2.0)
Keweenaw County *** 134.9 (67.2, 267.1) 83 (1, 83) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -0.7)
Leelanau County *** 143.7 (119.4, 172.8) 82 (55, 83) 30 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Grand Traverse County *** 155.7 (141.2, 171.3) 81 (63, 83) 90 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.4)
Washtenaw County *** 160.7 (151.9, 169.9) 80 (65, 83) 265 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.6)
Missaukee County *** 161.1 (128.7, 200.1) 79 (15, 83) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Benzie County *** 163.9 (134.5, 199.1) 78 (19, 83) 24 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Clinton County *** 165.2 (148.2, 183.7) 77 (46, 83) 73 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Midland County *** 165.3 (149.7, 182.1) 76 (48, 83) 86 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.0)
Ottawa County *** 165.3 (155.9, 175.2) 75 (61, 82) 237 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Oakland County *** 166.7 (162.3, 171.2) 74 (65, 80) 1,144 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
Charlevoix County *** 167.3 (141.7, 196.8) 73 (23, 83) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.3)
Livingston County *** 167.4 (156.2, 179.2) 72 (57, 82) 185 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Gogebic County *** 175.7 (144.7, 212.9) 71 (8, 83) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Ontonagon County *** 178.1 (135.6, 241.3) 70 (3, 83) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Kalamazoo County *** 178.4 (167.9, 189.4) 69 (44, 78) 227 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Marquette County *** 179.2 (161.5, 198.5) 68 (22, 81) 79 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Otsego County *** 181.9 (153.8, 214.1) 67 (9, 83) 31 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Iron County *** 183.1 (146.3, 229.2) 66 (3, 83) 20 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Emmet County *** 183.4 (159.4, 210.5) 65 (11, 82) 45 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Kent County *** 184.7 (177.6, 191.9) 64 (41, 71) 554 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Isabella County *** 188.1 (165.6, 212.6) 63 (10, 81) 54 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Ionia County *** 188.3 (167.5, 211.0) 62 (12, 80) 65 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Eaton County *** 189.8 (174.6, 206.0) 61 (17, 75) 123 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Chippewa County *** 189.9 (165.7, 216.7) 60 (7, 82) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Saginaw County *** 190.5 (179.3, 202.2) 59 (24, 71) 227 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Ingham County *** 191.0 (180.0, 202.5) 58 (23, 70) 242 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Cass County *** 191.4 (171.2, 213.7) 57 (11, 79) 71 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.4)
Oscoda County *** 191.6 (149.0, 246.4) 56 (1, 83) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Dickinson County *** 191.7 (164.9, 222.5) 55 (5, 81) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Shiawassee County *** 192.7 (173.7, 213.3) 54 (11, 77) 80 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Antrim County *** 192.7 (165.9, 223.7) 53 (5, 81) 40 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Barry County *** 193.3 (173.2, 215.3) 52 (9, 78) 73 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Menominee County *** 194.3 (167.0, 225.7) 51 (3, 81) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
St. Clair County *** 194.4 (182.0, 207.6) 50 (17, 70) 194 stable stable trend -6.7 (-12.9, 0.0)
Presque Isle County *** 194.7 (157.0, 241.0) 49 (2, 83) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Mason County *** 194.8 (167.9, 225.3) 48 (5, 81) 41 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Tuscola County *** 195.4 (174.9, 217.8) 47 (8, 77) 71 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Genesee County *** 196.0 (187.9, 204.4) 46 (23, 64) 465 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Arenac County *** 196.1 (162.0, 236.9) 45 (2, 82) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Huron County *** 196.3 (172.0, 223.7) 44 (6, 81) 50 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Berrien County *** 196.6 (184.2, 209.6) 43 (16, 68) 196 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Houghton County *** 196.9 (170.8, 226.2) 42 (4, 81) 43 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Iosco County *** 197.0 (172.2, 225.7) 41 (5, 80) 48 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Gratiot County *** 197.6 (172.7, 225.2) 40 (4, 80) 47 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Allegan County *** 198.5 (182.8, 215.1) 39 (11, 70) 129 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Macomb County *** 198.9 (193.2, 204.7) 38 (23, 56) 968 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Lake County *** 199.2 (161.6, 245.3) 37 (1, 83) 23 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.0)
Oceana County *** 199.7 (171.1, 232.2) 36 (3, 80) 37 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Delta County *** 199.9 (176.8, 225.7) 35 (6, 77) 57 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
St. Joseph County *** 200.4 (179.9, 222.7) 34 (6, 75) 73 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Newaygo County *** 200.5 (178.7, 224.4) 33 (5, 74) 66 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Cheboygan County *** 200.9 (174.0, 231.7) 32 (3, 79) 44 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Luce County *** 201.8 (148.7, 269.9) 31 (1, 83) 10 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
Montcalm County *** 202.5 (182.6, 224.0) 30 (6, 72) 80 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Lapeer County *** 202.7 (185.1, 221.6) 29 (7, 69) 110 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Lenawee County *** 203.0 (186.7, 220.4) 28 (7, 68) 122 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Wayne County *** 203.4 (199.1, 207.8) 27 (20, 47) 1,821 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.9)
Alpena County *** 204.2 (177.7, 234.2) 26 (2, 78) 45 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Van Buren County *** 204.4 (185.6, 224.6) 25 (5, 70) 94 stable stable trend -7.8 (-19.4, 5.4)
Alger County *** 204.4 (160.6, 259.1) 24 (1, 83) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Alcona County *** 209.0 (173.4, 254.9) 23 (1, 81) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Bay County *** 210.1 (194.4, 226.8) 22 (5, 61) 141 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Sanilac County *** 211.4 (187.8, 237.4) 21 (3, 69) 63 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Wexford County *** 211.7 (184.8, 241.8) 20 (2, 74) 47 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Osceola County *** 212.1 (180.5, 248.1) 19 (1, 76) 35 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Calhoun County *** 212.3 (197.7, 227.6) 18 (5, 54) 167 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Baraga County *** 212.9 (164.2, 273.4) 17 (1, 83) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Monroe County *** 215.7 (201.8, 230.4) 16 (4, 48) 192 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Crawford County *** 217.1 (180.9, 260.3) 15 (1, 78) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Gladwin County *** 217.6 (189.4, 249.6) 14 (1, 71) 48 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Mackinac County *** 218.1 (178.0, 267.3) 13 (1, 80) 22 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Muskegon County *** 221.1 (207.8, 235.1) 12 (3, 38) 217 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Mecosta County *** 222.4 (195.9, 251.6) 11 (1, 63) 56 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Manistee County *** 224.2 (195.6, 256.6) 10 (1, 68) 47 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Branch County *** 225.9 (200.3, 253.9) 9 (1, 58) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Jackson County *** 227.0 (213.3, 241.3) 8 (2, 32) 218 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Hillsdale County *** 232.9 (208.0, 260.2) 7 (1, 51) 69 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Kalkaska County *** 233.9 (194.5, 279.4) 6 (1, 74) 28 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Montmorency County *** 241.3 (195.4, 298.7) 5 (1, 72) 23 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Schoolcraft County *** 242.6 (191.4, 307.0) 4 (1, 78) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Roscommon County *** 243.4 (212.6, 278.7) 3 (1, 48) 58 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Ogemaw County *** 250.9 (217.9, 288.4) 2 (1, 41) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Clare County *** 258.4 (229.6, 290.4) 1 (1, 24) 63 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2021 1:42 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top