Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | No | 159.8 (158.7, 160.9) | N/A | 17,599 |
falling 
|
-1.2 (-1.4, -1.1) |
| United States 6 | No | 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) | N/A | 464,265 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.0, -1.7) |
| Montmorency County | No | 213.2 (179.0, 253.7) | 1 (1, 58) | 38 |
stable 
|
-0.5 (-1.4, 0.3) |
| Clare County | No | 211.5 (192.9, 231.7) | 2 (1, 19) | 105 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.0, -0.2) |
| Roscommon County | No | 209.4 (188.9, 232.1) | 3 (1, 24) | 101 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.6, 0.4) |
| Lake County | No | 204.8 (175.2, 239.5) | 4 (1, 59) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.4) |
| Kalkaska County | No | 201.0 (175.6, 229.4) | 5 (1, 56) | 49 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-0.9, 0.3) |
| Gladwin County | No | 197.5 (178.3, 218.6) | 6 (1, 42) | 89 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.1) |
| Oscoda County | No | 197.0 (163.8, 236.8) | 7 (1, 71) | 30 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.5) |
| Ogemaw County | No | 195.8 (175.4, 218.6) | 8 (1, 53) | 74 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.6) |
| Schoolcraft County | No | 188.4 (157.3, 226.5) | 9 (1, 79) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.8, 0.5) |
| Sanilac County | No | 187.7 (172.0, 204.6) | 10 (2, 51) | 115 |
stable
|
-6.5 (-15.2, 3.0) |
| Hillsdale County | No | 186.4 (171.3, 202.6) | 11 (2, 51) | 121 |
falling
|
-0.5 (-0.9, -0.1) |
| Gratiot County | No | 185.9 (168.9, 204.2) | 12 (2, 58) | 94 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-0.8, 0.1) |
| Manistee County | No | 185.0 (166.5, 205.6) | 13 (1, 59) | 80 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Alpena County | No | 182.7 (165.5, 201.6) | 14 (2, 61) | 89 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.4) |
| Luce County | No | 182.5 (142.7, 232.3) | 15 (1, 82) | 16 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.4, -0.2) |
| Osceola County | No | 182.2 (162.0, 204.5) | 16 (1, 68) | 64 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
| Calhoun County | No | 180.5 (171.0, 190.6) | 17 (6, 45) | 282 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-0.9, -0.4) |
| Branch County | No | 178.4 (162.7, 195.3) | 18 (4, 64) | 100 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
| Jackson County | No | 178.3 (169.9, 187.1) | 19 (8, 48) | 355 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.5) |
| Houghton County | No | 176.9 (159.4, 195.9) | 20 (3, 69) | 80 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.4) |
| Iosco County | No | 176.7 (159.0, 196.5) | 21 (4, 69) | 86 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.6, -0.7) |
| Mecosta County | No | 176.7 (160.6, 194.2) | 22 (5, 66) | 97 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.0, -0.2) |
| Bay County | No | 176.5 (166.7, 186.8) | 23 (9, 54) | 261 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.0, -0.6) |
| Alcona County | No | 176.2 (151.8, 205.9) | 24 (1, 79) | 45 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.3) |
| Muskegon County | No | 175.6 (167.1, 184.4) | 25 (9, 53) | 344 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-0.9, -0.4) |
| Iron County | No | 174.8 (148.0, 206.6) | 26 (1, 81) | 40 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
| Cass County | No | 174.4 (160.6, 189.3) | 27 (6, 65) | 126 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.8, 1.6) |
| Chippewa County | No | 173.7 (156.0, 193.2) | 28 (4, 72) | 75 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.1, -0.2) |
| Van Buren County | No | 173.3 (161.0, 186.4) | 29 (8, 64) | 159 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.0, -0.3) |
| Montcalm County | No | 173.3 (160.6, 186.8) | 30 (7, 63) | 144 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) |
| Crawford County | No | 172.7 (149.3, 199.7) | 31 (2, 79) | 44 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
| Delta County | No | 172.4 (157.4, 188.8) | 32 (5, 70) | 106 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) |
| Tuscola County | No | 172.0 (158.9, 186.1) | 33 (7, 67) | 134 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.3) |
| Ontonagon County | No | 171.9 (141.3, 213.6) | 34 (1, 82) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.5, 0.4) |
| Shiawassee County | No | 171.8 (159.8, 184.5) | 35 (9, 64) | 159 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
| St. Clair County | No | 171.7 (163.8, 180.0) | 36 (13, 57) | 370 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.3, -0.8) |
| Newaygo County | No | 171.7 (157.2, 187.2) | 37 (6, 69) | 113 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
| Lapeer County | No | 171.3 (160.5, 182.7) | 38 (10, 64) | 200 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
| St. Joseph County | No | 171.1 (157.9, 185.2) | 39 (8, 68) | 132 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.6) |
| Genesee County | No | 170.4 (164.8, 176.1) | 40 (19, 54) | 747 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.1, -0.9) |
| Monroe County | No | 169.2 (161.0, 177.9) | 41 (15, 61) | 332 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.8) |
| Lenawee County | No | 168.3 (158.1, 179.1) | 42 (12, 66) | 214 |
falling
|
-0.5 (-0.8, -0.2) |
| Wexford County | No | 167.7 (151.1, 185.8) | 43 (7, 77) | 78 |
falling
|
-5.3 (-8.6, -1.8) |
| Cheboygan County | No | 166.7 (149.4, 186.0) | 44 (8, 79) | 77 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
| Arenac County | No | 166.4 (143.6, 192.7) | 45 (4, 81) | 44 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
| Macomb County | No | 166.1 (162.5, 169.7) | 46 (31, 57) | 1,712 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.1, -0.9) |
| Ionia County | No | 166.0 (152.6, 180.4) | 47 (10, 72) | 118 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.6) |
| Oceana County | No | 165.7 (147.3, 186.2) | 48 (6, 80) | 63 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
| Emmet County | No | 164.9 (149.1, 182.3) | 49 (10, 77) | 86 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.3) |
| Mason County | No | 164.8 (148.0, 183.4) | 50 (8, 79) | 78 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
| Wayne County | No | 163.6 (160.4, 166.9) | 51 (36, 59) | 2,031 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.6, -1.4) |
| Baraga County | No | 162.8 (130.1, 203.6) | 52 (1, 83) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.4, 0.3) |
| Allegan County | No | 162.1 (152.6, 172.1) | 53 (22, 71) | 228 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
| Otsego County | No | 161.7 (143.1, 182.4) | 54 (8, 81) | 58 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
| Menominee County | No | 161.1 (143.2, 181.2) | 55 (9, 81) | 65 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.2, 0.0) |
| Eaton County | No | 159.7 (150.2, 169.8) | 56 (26, 73) | 219 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.4) |
| Ingham County | No | 159.6 (152.4, 167.0) | 57 (32, 70) | 396 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.2, -0.8) |
| Isabella County | No | 159.2 (145.3, 174.2) | 58 (17, 79) | 101 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
| Huron County | No | 158.0 (143.2, 174.3) | 59 (15, 81) | 90 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.4) |
| Berrien County | No | 156.7 (148.8, 165.0) | 60 (37, 74) | 313 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.8) |
| Presque Isle County | No | 156.2 (133.2, 183.4) | 61 (7, 83) | 41 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.8, -0.4) |
| Saginaw County | No | 153.5 (146.1, 161.4) | 62 (43, 76) | 337 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.4, -0.9) |
| Mackinac County | No | 153.2 (125.9, 187.1) | 63 (6, 83) | 27 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-2.5, -1.0) |
| Gogebic County | No | 152.0 (130.9, 176.8) | 64 (11, 83) | 41 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Barry County | No | 151.6 (139.5, 164.6) | 65 (34, 81) | 123 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.6, -1.2) |
| Midland County | No | 148.9 (138.8, 159.7) | 66 (44, 81) | 168 |
stable
|
2.7 (-0.1, 5.6) |
| Kalamazoo County | No | 148.9 (142.3, 155.8) | 67 (54, 79) | 400 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
| Missaukee County | No | 148.7 (126.8, 174.1) | 68 (11, 83) | 34 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.2) |
| Livingston County | No | 148.6 (141.6, 155.9) | 69 (53, 79) | 359 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-1.9, -1.3) |
| Marquette County | No | 148.4 (136.9, 160.7) | 70 (40, 82) | 133 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) |
| Dickinson County | No | 148.3 (131.7, 166.9) | 71 (25, 83) | 63 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
| Alger County | No | 148.1 (120.3, 182.5) | 72 (7, 83) | 23 |
stable
|
-14.2 (-34.4, 12.3) |
| Antrim County | No | 147.9 (130.8, 167.2) | 73 (25, 83) | 62 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.0, -1.0) |
| Charlevoix County | No | 147.3 (130.4, 166.1) | 74 (27, 83) | 63 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.6, -0.7) |
| Kent County | No | 146.6 (142.3, 151.1) | 75 (60, 79) | 902 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.2, -1.0) |
| Clinton County | No | 143.0 (132.3, 154.4) | 76 (52, 83) | 137 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.9) |
| Washtenaw County | No | 141.0 (135.0, 147.1) | 77 (64, 82) | 445 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.5, -1.1) |
| Oakland County | No | 140.6 (137.7, 143.6) | 78 (69, 81) | 1,852 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.5, -1.3) |
| Grand Traverse County | No | 138.4 (129.4, 148.1) | 79 (62, 83) | 185 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.9) |
| Benzie County | No | 138.1 (118.7, 160.6) | 80 (29, 83) | 42 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.9, -0.3) |
| Ottawa County | No | 135.0 (129.2, 141.0) | 81 (71, 83) | 419 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.2, -0.8) |
| Keweenaw County | No | 127.6 (81.7, 204.1) | 82 (1, 83) | 6 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.5, -0.7) |
| Leelanau County | Yes | 118.3 (102.8, 136.3) | 83 (72, 83) | 53 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.2, -1.0) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 6:30 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 6:30 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.